DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Housewives' Usage, Perception and Willingness to Use Beef Traceability for Settlement of Beef Traceability

쇠고기 이력제 정착을 위한 주부들의 쇠고기 이력제의 이용실태, 인식도 및 이용의도 분석

  • Kim, Hyochung (Dept. of Human Counseling & Welfare, The Institute of Human Environmental Welfare, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Meera (Dept. of Food Science & Nutrition, Center for Beautiful Aging, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김효정 (인제대학교 생활상담복지학부, 인간환경복지연구소) ;
  • 김미라 (경북대학교 식품영양학과, 장수생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2013.09.30
  • Accepted : 2013.12.16
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

This study examined the usage, perception and willingness to use beef traceability. The data were collected from 255 housewives in Busan and Gyeongnam region through a self-administered questionnaire. Frequency, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, t test, one-way ANOVA, Duncan's multiple range test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were conducted by SPSS Windows V.20.0. Only twelve percent of the respondents experienced to use beef traceability. Most respondents checked it by kiosk or bar code reader in a store. On the other hand, eighty-eight percent did not use beef traceability. The reasons for not usage of it were "Do not know beef traceability very well", "Do not know how to use beef traceability", and "Information from packing or counters is reliable" in order. In the level of perception of beef traceability, safety assurance was highest, followed by information quality, usefulness, and information accessibility. The percentage of correct answers of knowledge about beef traceability was not high. The multiple regression analysis showed that employment status, knowledge about beef traceability, information quality, information accessibility, and usefulness were significant factors to affect the willingness using beef traceability.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheong JH, Son KJ, Lee SS, Kim CJ, Kim KB, Yun YK. 2011. Comparative study on the beef traceability between in Korea and Australia. Korean J. Intl. Agri, 23(2): 226-232
  2. Cho WM, Chang SS, Cho YM, Kim HC, Jeon BS, Kwon EG, Paek BH. 2006. Kor. J. Survey of the first-operated nations(France and Japan) instance on traceability system in beef cattle. Intl. Agri. 18(3): 171-174
  3. Ham DC. 2010. Application of TAM model into consumers' system usage intention and factors affecting beef traceability system. Doctorate thesis. Sejong University. pp. 99-102
  4. Han SI. 2006. A study on the improvement of Hanwoo traceability system-The way of and effectiveness of Hanwoo traceability initiative. Rural Development Administration Research Report
  5. Heo D. 2006. Comparison of product traceability system of main countries. Food Industry, 192: 16-35
  6. Jeon MH, Jung GH, Kim HD. 2007. The adoption of traceability systems by farmers and its consumers' recognition. Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 14(1): 117-147
  7. Joo MB. 2006. Demonstration project of seafood traceability. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Report
  8. Kim JK, Kim HK. 2008. Agricultural and stockbreeding products recommender system using RFID based traceability system. J Intell Inform Syst, 14(2): 207-222
  9. Kim JS, Lee KH, Lee SH. 2009. Establishment and promotion strategy of lifetime tracing(Traceibility) system of agricultural products using RFID. Korea Society of IT Services. Proceedings of Korea Society of IT Services, 415-427
  10. Kim JU. 2006. A study on the consumer attitudes and market value of beef traceability. Master's thesis. Konkuk University. pp 74-75
  11. Kim TS, Jin YH. 2011. The effect of the food traceability system application applied with the TAM on consumer confidence. Korean J Culinary Res, 17(4): 74-87
  12. Lee BO, Shin HS. 2004. A study on the improvement of food safety system of meat in Korea. The Management Science, 30: 267-290
  13. Lee JY. 2008. Development and adoption of food traceability in Korea. Health-welfare Policy Forum. 136: 63-67
  14. Lee KI, Hwang YJ, Woo BJ, Cho SH, Jeong SM. 2011. Improving traceability system for agro-food products. Korean Rural Economic Institute Policy Research Report 2011-37
  15. Na YS. 2012. A study on the factors influencing behavioral intention related to beef traceability and TAM. Korean J Culinary Res, 18(1): 77-90
  16. Park SC. 2010. A study on the current situation of beef traceability and consumer's understanding. Master's thesis. Konkuk University. pp 38-43
  17. Europa. Summaries of EU legislation. Available from: http:// europa.eu/legislation_summaries/consumers/consumer_information/ f80501_en.htm. Accessed August 19, 2013
  18. Food Marketing Research and Information Center. Handbook for introduction of food traceability systems. Available from: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/syouan/seisaku/trace/pdf/handbook_en.pd f. Acessed August 19, 2013
  19. Medical Today. Available from: http://www.mdtoday.co.kr/mdtoday/ index.html?no=225070. Accessed August 20. 2013
  20. Ministry of Agriculture. Food and Rural Affairs. Beef Traceability. Available from: http://cattle.mtrace.go.kr/index.do. Accessed August 19, 2013
  21. Ministry of Government Legislation. Available from: http:// www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&p=&query=%EC%86%8C%EC%9 9%80&subMenu=1. Accessed August 19, 2013
  22. Yonhapnew. Available from: http://news.naver.com/main/read. nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=001&aid=0005163871. Accessed August 19, 2013

Cited by

  1. Effect of Addition of Ethanol on the Quality of Kimchi Paste vol.31, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2015.31.6.725
  2. Optimization of Kimchi Seasoning Based on Commercial Kimchi Perception Survey as Evaluated by Jeollabukdo Female Consumers vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2018.22.3.272
  3. Analysis on Worry about Meat Safety and Use Status of Meat-related Labeling of Adult Consumers vol.29, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.8.29.4.291