Advances in Energy Research

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic analysis of biomass torrefaction plants integrated with corn ethanol plants and coal-fired power plants

  • Tiffany, Douglas G. (Applied Economics, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Lee, Won Fy (Applied Economics, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Morey, Vance (Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Kaliyan, Nalladurai (Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota)
  • Received : 2013.07.01
  • Accepted : 2013.10.15
  • Published : 2013.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Torrefaction technologies convert assorted biomass feedstocks into energy-concentrated, carbon neutral fuel that is economically transported and easily ground for blending with fossil coals at numerous power plants around the world without needs to retrofit. Utilization of torrefied biomass in conventional electric generating units may be an increasingly attractive alternative for electricity generation as aging power plants in the world need to be upgraded or improved. This paper examines the economic feasibility of torrefaction in different scenarios by modeling torrefaction plants producing 136,078 t/year (150,000 ton/year) biocoal from wood and corn stover. The utilization of biocoal blends in existing coal-fired power plants is modeled to determine the demand for this fuel in the context of emerging policies regulating emissions from coal in the U.S. setting. Opportunities to co-locate torrefaction facilities adjacent to corn ethanol plants and coal-fired power plants are explored as means to improve economics for collaborating businesses. Life cycle analysis was conducted in parallel to this economic study and was used to determine environmental impacts of converting biomass to biocoal for blending in coal-fired power plants as well as the use of substantial flows of off-gasses produced in the torrefaction process. Sensitivity analysis of the financial rates of return of the different businesses has been performed to measure impacts of different factors, whether input prices, output prices, or policy measures that render costs or rewards for the businesses.

Keywords

References

  1. Damodaran, A. (2013), Cost of capital by sector, http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/-adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.htm.
  2. Benz, E. and Truck, S. (2009), "Modeling the price dynamics of $CO_{2}$ emission allowances", Energy Economics, 31(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.003
  3. Bepex International (2012), Torrefaction and densification, Milestone reports 1 to 9, http://www.xcelenergy.com/Environment/Renewable_Energy/Renewable_Energy_Grants/RDF_Completed_Biomass_Projects.
  4. Bergman, P.C.A., Boersma, A.R., Zwart, R.W.H. and Kiel, J.H.A. (2005), Torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal0fired power stations, Energy research Centre of the Netherlands ECN ECNC05013, ECN Biomass.
  5. Boutabba, M., Beaumais, O. and Lardic, S. (2012), "Permit price dynamics in the U.S. $SO_2$ trading program: a cointegration approach", Energy Economics, 34(3), 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.04.004
  6. Boyd, T., Vries, D., Kempthorne, H., Wearing, J. and Wolff, I. (2011), Mass & energy balance for torrefied pellet production, UBC biomass pelletization workshop, http://www.biomass.ubc.ca/docs/NORAM%20UBC%20Biomass%20Presentation%20May%202011%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf .
  7. Chittum, A. and Sullivan T. (2012), Coal retirements and the CHP investment opportunity, American council for an energy-efficient economy (ACEEE), Research report IE123.
  8. De Kam, M.J., Morey, R.V. and Tiffany, D.G. (2009), "Integrating biomass to produce heat and power at ethanol plants", Appl. Eng. Agric., 25(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26320
  9. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011), Table 31, Average sales price of coal by state and coal rank, Annual coal report 2011, http://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/acr.pdf.
  10. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2012), Coal transportation rates to the electric power sector, http://www.eia.gov/coal/transportationrates/print_version.cfm.
  11. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2012), PRISM 2.0: The value of innovation in environmental controls, http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/science/prism.pdf.
  12. Grotheim, K. (2010), "Biocoal: revenue & carbon footprint offset opportunity. torrefaction systems, Inc.", Proceedings of the fuel ethanol workshop, June, http://www.fuelethanolworkshop.com/files/docs/2010/Kevin%20Grotheim.pdf.
  13. Green Car Congress (2012), Proceedings of the federal appeals court vacates EPA cross-state pollution rule, August, http://www.greencarcongress.com/2012/08/csapr-20120822.html?cid=6a00d8341c4fbe53ef017c317b8f99970b.
  14. Kansas Department of Agriculture (KSDA) (2012), EPA approves pathway for ethanol produced from grain sorghum, December, http://www.ksda.gov/news/id/514.
  15. Li, H., Chen, Q., Zhang, X., Finney, K.N., Sharifi V.N. and Swithenbank J. (2012), "Evaluation of a biomass drying process using waste heat from process industries: a case study", Appl. Therm. Eng., 35, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.10.009
  16. Meyer, S., Glaser B. and Quicker P. (2011), "Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review", Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(22), 9473-9483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201792c
  17. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2012), Market brief: status of the voluntary renewable energy certificate market (2011 Data), http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/56128.pdf/.
  18. Tumuluru, J.S., Wright, C.T., Hess J.R. and Kenney K.L. (2011), "A review of biomass densification systems to develop uniform feedstock commodities for bioenergy application", Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining, 5(6), 683-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.324
  19. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2011), U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry, (Leads, R.D. Perlack and B.J. Stokes), ORNL/TM-2011/224. Oak ridge national laboratory, Oak ridge, TN.
  20. U.S. environmental protection agency (EPA) (2012a), Cross-state air pollution rule (CSAPR), http://www.epa.gov/airtransport/.
  21. U.S. environmental protection agency (EPA) (2012b), Mercury and air toxics standards, http://www.epa.gov/mats/.
  22. U.S. environmental protection agency (EPA) (2012c), Standards of performance for greenhouse gas emissions for new stationary sources: electric utility generating units, http://epa.gov/carbonpollutionstandard/pdfs/20120327proposal.pdf.
  23. U.S. environmental protection agency (EPA) (2012d), Renewable portfolio standards: an effective policy to support clean energy supply, http://www.epa.gov/chp/state-policy/renewablefs.html.
  24. Wisner, R. (2009), Renewable identification numbers (RINs) and government biofuels blending mandates, AgMRC renewable energy newsletter, http://www.agmrc.org/renewable_energy/biofuelsbiorefining_general/renewable-identification-numbers-rins-and-government-biofuels-blending-mandates/.

Cited by

  1. Life cycle assessment of a corn stover torrefaction plant integrated with a corn ethanol plant and a coal fired power plant vol.63, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.008
  2. A review on torrefied biomass pellets as a sustainable alternative to coal in power generation vol.40, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.181
  3. Integration of torrefaction and CHP plant: Operational and economic analysis vol.183, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.151
  4. Torrefaction of Straw from Oats and Maize for Use as a Fuel and Additive to Organic Fertilizers-TGA Analysis, Kinetics as Products for Agricultural Purposes vol.13, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082064