Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Difference in Acceptance Level of Smart Work among Tendencies of Personal Leadership Styles

조직 내 개인의 리더십 유형별 경향성에 따른 스마트워크 수용의도 차이

  • Park, Kiho (Dept. of New Business Foundation, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Yoen-Jeong (Dept. of New Business Foundation, Hoseo University)
  • Received : 2013.09.08
  • Accepted : 2013.11.20
  • Published : 2013.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Necessity of smart work that can change environment of working in organizations has been emphasized. Lots of organizations, however, wish to do work with smartness through adoption of smart work technologies, those are not sure whether smart work will be successful or not till now. Especially, viewpoints of leaders concerning efficiency and effectiveness of smart work who operate the organizations may be different in many circumstances such as industries, characteristics of work, etc. Therefore, hopefully, this research want to investigate whether differences among leader and non-leader group, tendencies of personal leadership styles in work exit or not by empirical and exploratory approach. Totally, 118 questionnaires had been collected and performed test of mean difference between groups. As a result, some items such as working place, working methods, flexible time and tension of smartwork showed significant differences between level of leadership styles and non-leader and leader groups. And, futhermore, from this research I believe that we can have a few insights for successful smart working environment in organizations.

많은 조직들이 스마트워크 개념의 도입을 통하여 업무를 워크 스마트하게 하려는 의지는 있지만 어떻게, 무엇부터 시작해야 할지, 또한 이것이 성공적인 결과를 가져올지에 대해서는 확신을 가지지 못하는 실정이다. 특히 조직의 구성원인 개인의 리더십 유형에 따라 스마트워크 수용의도에 긍정적으로 인식하는 경우와 부정적으로 인식하는 경우가 있을 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 근무방식의 변화를 요구하고 있는 스마트워크 시대에 조직 내 리더와 조직 구성원들의 리더십 성향별로 스마트워크를 수용하는 태도에 차이 여부를 규명하고자 하였다. 실증연구를 위해 응답된 설문지는 총118개 였으며, 분석방법은 집단간 평균차이 검정을 실시하였다. 실증연구결과 리더십 성향별로 근무장소, 근무방식, 스마트워크 적극추진여부 등의 특정 항목에 대해서는 수용의도에 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났으며, 리더집단과 비리더 집단간에도 기기사용방식, 근무지, 유연근무제 등을 받아들이는 태도에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 스마트워크를 도입하고자 하나 조직 내 저항 혹은 리더와 비리더 집단간의 인식차이를 극복하고자 하는 최고경영자나 조직에 시사점을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, "Next Generation Connectivity Report", Feb., 2010.
  2. Bjerke, B. and Hultman, C.M., "A dynamic perspective on entrepreneurship, leadership and management as a proper mix for growth", Int. J. Innovation and Learning, Vol. 1, 2003, pp.72-93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2003.003616
  3. Bush, W. R. 1990. "Telecommuting: The case of research software development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change 37.
  4. Cho, N. J., Han, H. S., Park, K. H. and Kwon, S. R., "Change of communication and future economic structures based on the convergence", Future Research based on the digital convergence(III) series 11-04, KISDI, 2011.
  5. Cho, S. H., "Teleworking in 2010 and change of working and residual environment", Journal of Informatization Policy, National Information Society Agency, 1997.
  6. Elenkov, D.S., "Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, 2002, pp.467-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00174-0
  7. Garcia-Morales, V.J., Llorens-Montes, F.J. and Verdu-Jover, A.J., "Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship", Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 106, 2006, pp.21-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610642940
  8. Handy, S. L. and P. L. Mokhtarian. "Planning for telecommuting: Measurement and Policy Issues," Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 61, No. 1, 1995, Winter.
  9. Jang, D. S., "Exploratory research on the moderating effect of Smart Work environment between cognition and performance of work for SM employee", Korean Society of Computer Information, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012, pp. 225-230. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2012.17.2.225
  10. Jung, C. H., "Issues for progressive trend and activation of smart work". JIPS, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2011, pp. 82-89.
  11. Kang, Y. J., "Recognition of public officers about introducing telework", 2004 Symposium of The Korean association for governance, 2004, pp. 1-23.
  12. Kim, D. S., Power Leadership, Whybooks, 2012, pp.152-166.
  13. Kim, F. V., "Direction of policies for strong global smart nation through balanceing between life and work", ITA journal, Vol. 134, 2011, pp. 14-19.
  14. Kwak, I. G., Kim, J. B. and Lee, N. Y., "Expansion of flexible working arrangement and activation of smart work center", JIPS, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2011, pp. 59-72.
  15. Lee, J. S. and Kim, H. S., "A study on the current situation of smart work and activation issues". Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society. Vol. 13, No. 4, 2010, pp. 75-96.
  16. Lee, L. T., "The influences of leadership style and market orientation on export performance: an empirical study of small and medium enterprises in Taiwan", Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2008, pp.404-424. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.020558
  17. Lee, S. O.(translator), Technologies of Leadership (Team leader work book series of HBS), Vol. 8-Harvard Business Press, Hans Media, 2008
  18. Manz, C. C. and Sims Jr. H. P., "Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, 1987, pp. 106-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
  19. Ministry of Gender Equality & Family, "A study on the expansion of flexible time in organization", MOGEF, 2010, pp. 112-123.
  20. NIA, "Future of Work-Smart Work", 2012 International conference of smart work, 2012.
  21. Oh, H. S., "Activation of entertainment in the age of smart work", Korean Entertainment Industry Association, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1-15.
  22. Park, J. K., "Case of smart work in Woongjin Holdings", Journal of Internet Information, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2011, pp. 29-33.
  23. Park, K. H., Park, S. H. and Rangnekar, S., "Finding the Causal Relationship between Self-Leadership Strategies Academic Performance and Class Attendance Attitudes : Comparative Research between Korean and Indian Students", Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-13.
  24. Pflaeging, N., "Un-leadership: How to make Smart Work by getting rid of management", 2012
  25. PwC, http://www.pwc.com/kr/ko/ challenges/smartwork.jhtml?query=smart&live=1, 2012.
  26. Rane, A. and Argawal, T., "The Future of Workplace", March, 2011.
  27. Tichy, N. M., "The Leadership Engine: How winning companies build leaders at every level", Collins, 2007, pp.247-272..
  28. Wang, C.B., Luxhoj, J.T. and Johansen, J. (2004) "Applying a knowledge management modeling tool for manufacturing vision (MV) development", Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 104, pp.795--743.
  29. Wu, W.Y., Chiang, C.Y. and Jiang, J.S. (2002) "Interrelationships between TMT management styles and organizational innovation", Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 102, pp.171-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210421363