DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

빅데이터, 프라이버시와 사회적 가치의 조화방안

Big data, how to balance privacy and social values

  • 황주성 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원)
  • Hwang, Joo-Seong (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, SEOULTECH)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.04
  • 심사 : 2013.11.20
  • 발행 : 2013.11.28

초록

빅데이터는 막대한 경제적 기회뿐만 아니라 공적 가치를 낳을 것으로 예상된다. 하지만 공공기관은 물론 민간기업의 빅데이터 사용은 프라이버시 침해에 대한 우려를 지속적으로 제기하고 있다. 행위패턴의 프라이버시 등 기존에는 없었던 새로운 위험을 유발함으로써 빅데이터는 프라이버시에 대한 기존 논의의 틀을 와해시킬 우려가 크다는 것이다. 반면, 빅데이터는 쿠키 등 행위추적에 근거한 개인정보의 부작용을 불식시키는 대안으로 인식되기도 한다. 본 논문은 빅데이터가 행위정보를 기반으로 하는 개인정보와는 어떻게 다른지를 밝히는데 초점을 둔다. 나아가, 개인정보로부터 파행되는 기존의 프라이버시 문제를 해결하기 위해 빅데이터에 대한 정책이 어떠한 대안을 가질 수 있는지도 제시할 것이다.

Big data is expected to bring forth enormous public good as well as economic opportunity. However there is ongoing concern about privacy not only from public authorities but also from private enterprises. Big data is suspected to aggravate the existing privacy battle ground by introducing new types of privacy risks such as privacy risk of behavioral pattern. On the other hand, big data is asserted to become a new way to by-pass tradition behavioral tracking such as cookies, DPIs, finger printing${\cdots}$ and etc. For it is not based on a targeted person. This paper is to find out if big data could contribute to catching out behavioral patterns of consumers without threatening or damaging their privacy. The difference between traditional behavioral tracking and big data analysis from the perspective of privacy will be discerned.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boiller, D., 2010, The Promise and Peril of Big Data, Washing D.C. : The Aspen Institute.
  2. Boyd, D. and Crawford, K., 2011, Six Provocations for Big Data. Paper presented at the Oxford Internet Institute's "A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society" (September 21, 2011).
  3. Boyd, D., 2010, Privacy and Publicity in the Context of Big Data, WWW, Raleigh, North Carolina, April 29.
  4. Chester, J., 2012, Cookie wars: How new data profiling and targeting techniques threaten citizens and consumers in the "Big Data" era, In Gutwirth et al. (eds.), European Data Protection: In Good Health?, B.V: Springer Science + Business Media
  5. De Filippi, P. and Porcedda, M.G., 2012, Privacy Belts on the Innovation Highway
  6. Forbes, 2012. 2. 16, How Target Figured Out A Teen Girl Was Pregnant Before Her Father Did
  7. Franks, B., 2012, Taming the Big Data Tidal Wave: finding opportunities in huge data streams with advanced analytics, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
  8. Goldberg, N. and Miller, M., 2011, The practice of law in the age of 'Big Data'
  9. Kuner, C. et als, 2012, The challenge of 'big data' for data protection, International Data Privacy Law, 2012, Vol. 2, No. 2,47-49 https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips003
  10. Mckinsey Global Institute, 2011, Big Data: The Nest Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity
  11. Ohm, P., 2010, Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization, CLA LAW REVIEW 57, 1701-1776
  12. Rubinstein, 2012, Big data: the end of privacy or a new beginning?, Public law & legal theory research paper series, working paper No. 12-56
  13. Solove, 2006, A Taxanomy of privacy, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 154, no. 3. 477-560. https://doi.org/10.2307/40041279
  14. Schwartz, P., 2004, 'Property, Privacy, and Personal Data', Harvard Law Review, vol. 117, no. 7. 2055-2128.
  15. Tene, O. and Polonetsky, J., 2012a, Privacy in the age of big data: a time for big decision, Stanford Law Review Online, vol.64, 63-69.
  16. Tene, O. and Polonetsky, J., 2012b, Big data for all: privacy and user control in the age of analytics, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2149364

피인용 문헌

  1. The effect of Privacy Factors on the Provision Intention of Individual Information from the SNS Users vol.14, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.12.1
  2. A study on the entrepreneurial intention determinants of university students vol.12, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.11.141