DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Micronucleus Test for the Classification of Chemical Mutagenicity according to Globally Harmonized System

  • Rim, Kyung-Taek (Center for Chemical Safety and Health, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Yeong (Center for Chemical Safety and Health, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Chung, Yong-Hyun (Center for Chemical Safety and Health, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
  • Received : 2013.05.23
  • Accepted : 2013.06.11
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

To classify the chemical hazard according to globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS), we investigated the genotoxicity of three chemicals, methyl myristate, 2-ethylhexanoic acid zinc salt, N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-hydroxyethyl) ethylenediamine, using male ICR mice bone marrow cells for the screening of micronucleus induction. Although these three chemicals have already been tested numerous times, a micronucleus test has not been conducted. The seven week-old male ICR mice were tested at three dosages for the three chemicals, respectively. After 24 h of oral administration with the three chemicals, the mice were sacrificed and their bone marrow cells were prepared for smearing slides. As a result of counting the micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte (MNPCE) of 2,000 polychromatic erythrocytes, all treated groups expressed no statistically significant increase of MNPCE compared to the negative control group. There were no clinical signs related with the oral exposure of these three chemicals. It was concluded that these three chemicals did not induce micronucleus in the bone marrow cells of ICR mice, and there was no direct proportion with dosage. These results indicate that the three chemicals have no mutagenic potential under each test condition, and it is not classified these chemicals as mutagens by GHS.

Keywords

References

  1. Brusick DJ, Fields WR, Myhr BC, and Doolittle DJ (2008) Chapter 23: Genetic toxicology. In Principles and Methods of Toxicology , Wallace Hayes A. (5th ed ), pp. 1195-6. Informa Healthcare USA Inc., USA.
  2. Combes R, Grindon C, Cronin MT, Roberts DW, and Garrod J (2007) Proposed integrated decision-tree testing strategies for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in relation to the EU REACH legislation. Altern Lab Anim 35, 267-87.
  3. Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparisons procedure several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50, 1096-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294
  4. Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20, 482-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528490
  5. ECVAM (2002) Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity Altern Lab Anim 30, Suppl. 1, 83-93.
  6. European Union, Regulation (EC) (2008) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the councel of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006., EU
  7. Heddle JA, Cimino MC, Hayashi M, Romagna F, Shelby MD, Tucker JD et al. (1991) Micronuclei as an index of cytogenetic damage: past, present, and future. Environ Mol Mutagen 18, 277-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850180414
  8. Heddle JA, Hite M, Kirkhart B, Larson K, MacGregor JT, Newell GW et al. (1983) The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. A report of the US Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutat Res 123, 61-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1110(83)90047-7
  9. Kastenbaum MA and Bowman KO (1970) Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res 9, 527-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(70)90038-2
  10. Kim SJ, Rim KT, Kang MG, Kim JK, Chung YH, and Yang JS (2010) A Study of Micronucleus Induction with Methyl Formate and 2-Methylbutane in Bone Marrow Cells of Male ICR Mice. Saf Health Work 1, 80-6. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2010.1.1.80
  11. Maurici D, Aardema M, Corvi R, Kleber M, Krul C, Laurent C et al. (2005) Genotoxicity and mutagenicity. Altern Lab Anim 33, Suppl. 1, 117-30.
  12. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MoEL) (2012) Governmental Notification No. 2012-31. Exposure limits of chemicals and physical agents, Korea.
  13. Morita T, Hayashi M, Nakajima M, Tanaka N, Tweats DJ, Morikawa K et al. (2009) Practical issues on the application of the GHS classification criteria for germ cell Mutagens. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 55, 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.06.001
  14. OECD (2011) OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4 Health Effects. OECD iLibrary, France
  15. Plunkett LM, Kaplan AM, and Becker RA (2010) An enhanced tiered toxicity testing framework with triggers for assessing hazards and risks of commodity chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 58, 382-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.003
  16. Schmid W (1975) The micronucleus test. Mutat Res 31, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(75)90058-8
  17. Scott D and Evans HJ (1967) X-ray-induced chromosomal aberrations in vicia faba: changes in response during the cell cycle. Mutat Res 4, 579-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(67)90044-9
  18. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H et al. (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35, 206-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::AID-EM8>3.0.CO;2-J
  19. UK government (2012) Health and Safety Executive. United Nations Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). HSE, UK.
  20. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2004) Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS). In Part 3. Health and environmental hazards. Chapter 3.5. Germ cell mutagenicity. pp. 155-62, UNECE, USA.
  21. United Nations (UN) (2011) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). 4th revised edition., USA
  22. Willey RJ (2012) International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology, Understanding a safety data sheet (SDS) in regards to process safety. Procedia Engineering 45, 857-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.250
  23. Winer BJ (1971) In Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, USA.
  24. Yu TW and Dashwood RH (2007) Measuring antigenotoxic effects using the Ames test and Comet assay. Am Biotech Lab 25, 22-3.