References
- Bae, M -J. (2003). The perceptual structure of distinctive features in Korean consonants. Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul National University (배문정(2003). 한국어 변별자질의 지각적 표상구조. 서울대학교 박사학위논문)
- Bae, M. -J. (2009a). Perceptual Structure of Korean Consonants in High Vowel Contexts, Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 1(2), 95-103. (배문정(2009a), 고설 모음 환경에서 한국어 자음의 지각적 구조, 말소리와 음성과학, 1(2), 95-103)
- Bae, M. -J. (2009b). Nonlinear Interaction between Consonant and Vowel Features in Korean Syllable Perception, Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 1(4), 29-38. (배문정(2009b), 한국어 단음절에서 자음과 모음자질의 비선형적 지각, 말소리와 음성과학, 1(4), pp. 29-38)
- Bae, M. -J. (2010). The perceptual hierachy of distinctive features in Korean consonants, Journal of the Korean society of speech sciences, 2(4), 109-118. (배문정(2010), 한국어 자음에서 변별자질들의 지각적 위계, 말소리와 음성과학, 2(4), 109-118)
- Bae, M. -J. & Kim, J.-O. (2002). The Perceptual Structure of Korean Consonants, Journal of Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 375-408. (배문정․김정오, (2002). 한국어 자음의 지각적 구조, 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 14(4), 375-408.)
- Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
- Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. Pergammon Press.
- Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913
- Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. (MIT Press, 1991.)
- Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000440
- Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
- Dahan, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2006). Spoken-word recognition. In M. J. Traxler &M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 249-283). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
- Eimas P D., Tartter V. C., Miller, J. L., Keuthen, N. J. (1978) Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214289
- Eimas, P. D., Tartter, V. C., & Miller, J. L. (1981). Dependency Relations During the Processing of Speech. In Eimas, P. D, Miller, J. L. (Eds.) Perspectives in the Study of Speech (pp. 283-309). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
- Fowler, C. A. (1995). Speech production. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language and Communication (vol 11), NY: Academic Press.
- Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (1989). Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory and Cognition, 17, 134-140. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197063
- Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1996). Speech perception and spoken word recognition. In N. J. Lass (Eds.) Principles of Experimental Phonetics. (pp. 277-327).
- Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology, Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.
- Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M., & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kim, K. H. (1987). The Phonological Representation of Distinctive Features: Korean Consonantal Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, the University of Iowa.
- Koh, Y. J. (2000). The Birth and Life of Distinctive Features, Seoul: Tongin. (고영진 (2000). 변별자질 그 탄생과 활약. 서울: 동인.)
- Kohler, K. (1990). Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological facts and phonetic explanations. In Hardcastle W. J. & A. Marchal (eds.) Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 69-92). Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Lahiri, A. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1992). Lexical processing and phonological representa- tion. In G. J. Docherty & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 229-260).
- Lahiri, A. & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.002
- Lee. K. O. & Park, H. S. (1977). The restoration of deep syllables and the role of syllables in Korean speech perception. Journal of Korean Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9. 73-94 (이광오와 박현수(1997). 음성지각 과정에서 음절의 역할과 기저음절의 복원. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 9, 73-94.)
- Liberman, A. M, & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 136.
- Lindblom, B. (1998). Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure. In Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight C. (Eds.). Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lindblom, B. (2000). Developmental origins of adult phonology: The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns. Phonetica, 57, 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028482
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.653
- McCarthy, J. J. (1994). The phonetics and phonology of semitic pharyngeals. In Patricia Keating, Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form (pp. 191-233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, G. A. and Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 623-638.
- Mitchell, L. M. & Singh, S. (1974). Perceptual structure of 16 prevoclaic English consonants sententially embedded. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1355-1357. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914714
- Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.564
- Port, R. (2006) The graphical basis of phones and phonemes. In Murray Munro and Ocke-Schwen Bohn (Eds.). Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production. (pp. 349-365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Prince, A. & Smolensky. P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2.
- Repp, B. H. & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Phonetic categories are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.) Categorical perception. (pp. 89-112). Cambridge University Press.
- Sehneider, W. & Shiffrin, R..M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psych. Rev. 84, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
- Stevens, K. N. (1986). Models of phonetic recognition II: A feature-based model of speech recognition. In P. Mermelstein (eds.), Proceedings of the Montreal Satellite Symposium on Speech Recognition, Twelfth International Congress on Acoustics.
- Treisman, A., & Paterson, R., (1984). Emergent features, attention and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.12
- Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automatic and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423032
- Wang, M. D. & Bilger, R. C. (1973). Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1248-1266. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1914417