DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of Agricultural Facility Legislation

농업용 시설의 건축 및 이용 법령 개선연구

  • Lee, Won (Dept. of regional Construction Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Jang, Woo-Suk (Dept. of regional Construction Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Kwon, Hyung-Dun (Dept. of Law, Kongju Nat'I Univ.) ;
  • Song, Jae-Il (Dept. of Law, Myongji Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Suk (Dept. of regional Development, Kongju Nat'l Univ.) ;
  • Jung, Nam-Su (Dept. of regional Construction Engineering, Kongju Nat'l Univ.)
  • 이원 (공주대학교 산업과학대학 지역건설공학) ;
  • 장우석 (공주대학교 산업과학대학 지역건설공학) ;
  • 권형둔 (공주대학교 법학과) ;
  • 송재일 (명지대학교 법과대학) ;
  • 김지석 (공주대학교 부동산학과) ;
  • 정남수 (공주대학교 산업과학대학 지역건설공학)
  • Received : 2013.10.25
  • Accepted : 2013.11.19
  • Published : 2013.12.30

Abstract

As facilities performing the production, processing, preservation, and shipment of agricultural products; agricultural facilities are categorized into planting facilities and livestock facilities based on the management target. Agricultural facilities are set in farmlands, and facility users mainly complain about the legal or institutional restrictions on farm rather than their own facilities itself. From 2009 to 2012, the Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) published the "Casebook of farmer Complaints on Farmlands" in order to help answer farmers' questions and support public workers' workloads. However, contents related to agricultural facility installed in farmland are currently not dealt with in particular. Among agricultural facilities, demands of property rights with livestock facilities have risen due to construction permissions, operational restrictions, and high initial investment costs; and relevant laws were revised and are now being executed. However, for planting facilities such as mushroom facilities, ginseng facilities, and greenhouses; farmer complaints related to property rights are constantly increasing because revisions to relevant laws are not being made despite the rising diversity of construction materials through technical developments as well as the rising scale of assets-i.e. mechanization, automation, and the application of New Regeneration Energies according to capital influx. In this study, the current state of relevant agricultural facility legislation were organized and their drawbacks deduced in order to propose improvements of Agricultural Facility Legislation. The result of interviewing with public workers and farmers show that agricultural facilities should be regarded as extensions of farmlands rather than as facilities built in land where development actions were being taken. Alternatives able to reflect these opinions were suggested through expert consultation.

Keywords

References

  1. 김판기, 2009, 개방형 축사 등 동식물 관련 건축물의 등기에 관한연구, 한양법학회, 27, 157-175
  2. 황은경, 2009, 건축물의 종류 규정 법령간 문제점 도출에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회, 25(8), 15-22
  3. 김영창, 이응희, 이중우, 2003, 건축법 개정의 변천에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회, 19(3), 19-27
  4. 조한권, 2008, 건축법의 주요내용, 국토, 317, 47-56
  5. 황은경. 2008, 관련 개별법령 분석을 통한 건축 허가규정 개정에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회, 24(11), 64-74
  6. 송재일, 2010, 농지 거래법제의 문제점과 개선방안, 한국민사법학회, 49(1), 3-47
  7. 박현출, 1995, 농지의 소유.거래 및 이용에 대한 규제완화, 국토, 168, 82-88
  8. 김대명, 2008, 농지의 소유제도 연구, 한국법학회, 33, 1-38
  9. 금태환, 2012, 한국 농업법의 과제, 행정법이론실무학회, 32, 31-54
  10. 김문기, 남상운, 서원명, 윤용철, 이석건, 이현우, 2000, 농업시설공학
  11. 법제처, 2013, 건축법
  12. 법제처, 2013, 건축법 시행령
  13. 법제처, 2013, 건축 기본법
  14. 법제처, 2013, 농지법
  15. 법제처, 2013, 농지법 시행령
  16. 법제처, 2013, 국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률
  17. 법제처, 2013, 부동산등기법
  18. 법제처, 2013, 민법
  19. 법제처, 2010, 축사의 부동산등기에 관한 특례법
  20. 농촌진흥청, 2013, 농업용어사전
  21. 대법원, 2013, 대법원 등기예규 제1086호
  22. 대법원, 1995, 3402-674 질의회답