DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

China's Roadmap for Fostering S&T and Catalyzing Innovation: Lessons for India

  • Sandhya, G.D. (National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS)) ;
  • Nath, Pradosh (National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS))
  • 투고 : 2013.02.21
  • 심사 : 2013.11.01
  • 발행 : 2013.07.01

초록

In the past three decades since the advent of market oriented reforms began in 1978, China has made rapid strides in catalyzing economic growth. The economic development coincides with the development of significant capabilities in several areas of science, technology, and innovation. China has recorded notable achievements in a number of emerging fields. This paper investigates the process that has catalyzed the developments in Science and Technology (S&T) and the key factors that have facilitated this process. The causality of dynamism of S&T in China points at targeted development, an emphasis on high growth industries and high technology, commensurate resource mobilization, ruthless restructuring of innovation actors, dynamic organization and management of R&D, continuously evolving policies with strict enforcement, and implementable instruments. This paper attempts to bring out the roadmap of the Chinese transformation process in S&T and derive policy lessons for India.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Battele (2010) R&D Magazine, December 15, www.rdmag.com
  2. Battelle (2011) Global R&D funding forecast by Martin Grueber and Tim Studt, R&D Magazine, December 16.
  3. Bhattacharya, S. and Bhati, M. (2011) China's emergence as a global nanotech player: lessons for countries in transition, China Report, 47(4), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944551104700401
  4. Bhattacharya, S. and Shilpa, B.M. (2012) China and India: the two new players in the nanotechnology race, Scientometrics, 93(1), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0651-7
  5. Cao, C. (2004) Challenges for technological development in China's industry, China Perspective, July-August, http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/924.
  6. Cao, C. (2008) China's brain drain at the high end: why government policies have failed to attract first-rate academics to return, Asian Population Studies, 4(3), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730802496532
  7. Hu, A.G. (2007) Technology parks and regional economic growth in China, Research Policy, 36(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.003
  8. Porter, A. et al. (1996) Indicators of high technology competitiveness of 28 countries, International Journal of Technology Management, 12(1), 1-32.
  9. Preeg, E.H. (2008) Technological advances in Key Industries in China, Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, July 16, MAPI.
  10. Rongping, M. (2004) Development of Science and Technology Policy, Tokyo, September, http://www.nistep.go.jp/IC/ic040913/pdf/30_04ftx.pdf.
  11. NSB (2012) National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators, Arlington VA: National Science Foundation, (NSF 12-01).
  12. OECD (2008) OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, China.
  13. Sandhya, G.D. et al. (2012) A Comparative Study on S&T, Innovation and Development Strategies of China and South Korea vis-a-vis India, Study commissioned by the Office of the Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government of India, CSIR, NISTADS, June.
  14. Tilak, J.B.G. (2012) Higher education policy in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 47(13), March, 36-40.
  15. Xin, F. (2010) Re-examining the reform of China's S&T system: a historical perspective, Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/17585521011032513
  16. Yuan, W. (2005) China's government R&D institutes: changes and associated issues, Science, Technology and Society 10(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180401000102
  17. Zhang, D.Q. et al. (2011) Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese academy of sciences, Research Policy, 40(6), 875-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.010