DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vision-based Ground Test for Active Debris Removal

  • Lim, Seong-Min (Department of Satellite Systems and Applications Engineering, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Dong (Department of Satellite Systems and Applications Engineering, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seong, Jae-Dong (Department of Satellite Systems and Applications Engineering, University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2013.08.09
  • Accepted : 2013.09.23
  • Published : 2013.12.15

Abstract

Due to the continuous space development by mankind, the number of space objects including space debris in orbits around the Earth has increased, and accordingly, difficulties of space development and activities are expected in the near future. In this study, among the stages for space debris removal, the implementation of a vision-based approach technique for approaching space debris from a far-range rendezvous state to a proximity state, and the ground test performance results were described. For the vision-based object tracking, the CAM-shift algorithm with high speed and strong performance, and the Kalman filter were combined and utilized. For measuring the distance to a tracking object, a stereo camera was used. For the construction of a low-cost space environment simulation test bed, a sun simulator was used, and in the case of the platform for approaching, a two-dimensional mobile robot was used. The tracking status was examined while changing the position of the sun simulator, and the results indicated that the CAM-shift showed a tracking rate of about 87% and the relative distance could be measured down to 0.9 m. In addition, considerations for future space environment simulation tests were proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkins EM, Lennon JA, Peasco RS, Vision-based following for cooperative astronaut-robot operations, in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conf., Big Sky, MT, 9-16 Mar 2002.
  2. Benvenuto R, Carta R, Active debris removal system based on tethered-nets: experimental results, in Proceedings of the 9th PEGASUS-AIAA Student Conf., Milano, Italy, 4 Apr 2013.
  3. Choi JH, Lee D, Bang H, Tracking an unknown moving target from UAV: Extracting and localizing an moving target with vision sensor based on optical flow, in Proceedings of the 5th Int'l Conf. on Automation, Robotics and Applications, Wellington, New Zealand, 6-8 Dec 2011.
  4. Fehse W, Automated rendezvous and docking of spacecraft, vol. 16, Cambridge Aerospace Series, eds. Rycroft MJ, Shyy W (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), 124-126.
  5. Freeman WT, Tanaka K, Ohta J, Kyuma K, Computer vision for computer games, in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Int'l Conf. on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Killington, VT, Oct 1996.
  6. Horn BKP, Robot vision, MIT Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Series, eds. Horn BKP (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1986), 278-422.
  7. Hsia SC, Hsiao CH, Huang CY, Single-object-based segmentation and coding technique for video surveillance system, JEI, 18, 033007 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3196780
  8. Kim HD, Lee SC, Cho DH, Seong JD, Development of KARI Space debris collision risk management system, in Proceedings of the KSAS 2013 Spring Conf., Jungsun, 10-12 Apr 2013.
  9. Kim K, Grundmann M, Shamir A, Matthews I, Hodgins J, et al., Motion fields to predict play evolution in dynamic sport scenes, in Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, CA, 13-18 Jun 2010.
  10. Krag H, Space Debris: Public Talk, in Presentations at the KARI Space Debris Short Lecture, Daejeon, 10-11 Jul 2013.
  11. Liou JC, NASA's long-term debris environment and active debris removal modeling activities, in Proceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Orbital Debris Removal, Chantilly, VA, 8-10 Dec 2009.
  12. Merino M, Ahedo E, Bombardelli C, Urrutxua H, Pelaez J, Space debris removal with an ion beam shepherd satellite: Target-plasma interaction, in Proceedings of 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. & Exhibit, San Diego, CA, 31 Jul-03 Aug 2011.
  13. NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, A Preliminary active debris removal study, Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 11(4) (2007).
  14. Nishida S, Kawamoto S, Okawa Y, Terui F, Kitamura S, Space debris removal system using a small satellite, Acta Astronautica, 65, 95-102 (2009). http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.01.041
  15. Petit A, Despre N, Marchand E, Kanani K, Chaumette F, et al., 3D model-based visual tracking for space autonomous rendezvous, in Proceedings of the 8th Int'l ESA Conf. on Guidance and Navigation Control Systems, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic, 5-10 Jun 2011.
  16. Phipps CR, Baker KL, Libby SB, Liedahl DA, Olivier SS, et al., Removing orbital debris with lasers, Advanced in space research, 49, 1283-1300 (2012). http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.003
  17. Richard M, Kroning L, Belloni F, Rossi S, Gass V, et al., Uncooperative rendezvous and docking for microsats, in Proceedings of the 6th Int'l Conf. on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, Istanbul, Turkey, 12-14 Jun 2013.
  18. Romano M, Friedman DA, Shay TJ, Laboratory experimentation of autonomous spacecraft approach and docking to a collaborative target, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 44, 164-173 (2007). http:// dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.22092
  19. Salhi A, Jammoussi AY, Object tracking system using camshift, meanshift and kalman filter, Journal of World Academy of science, engineering and technology, 64, 674-679 (2012).
  20. Stohlman OR, Lappas V, Deorbitsail: a deployable sail for de-orbiting, in Proceedings of the 54th AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Boston, MA, 8-11 Apr 2013.
  21. Wimmer T, Boge T, EPOS: A Hardware-in-the-Loop robotic simulation assembly for testing automated rendezvous and docking GNC sensor payloads, in Proceedings of the 8th Int'l ESA Conf. on Guidance and Navigation Control Systems, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic, 5-10 Jun 2011.

Cited by

  1. Attitude recovery from feature tracking for estimating angular rate of non-cooperative spacecraft vol.83, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.017
  2. Control of a Noncooperative Approach Maneuver Based on Debris Dynamics Feedback vol.41, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002685
  3. Feature-Based Assessment of Passive Spacecraft Dynamics During Removal Missions vol.56, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055917