Surgery First Approach in Orthognathic Surgery : Indication and limitation

임상가를 위한 특집 4 - 턱교정수술에서 선수술접근 :적응증과 한계

  • Hwang, Dae-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 황대석 (부산대학교 치의학 전문대학원 구강악안면외과)
  • Received : 2012.10.11
  • Accepted : 2012.10.18
  • Published : 2012.11.01

Abstract

Surgery first approach in orthognathic surgery is to proceed the orthognathic surgery without preoperative orthodontic treatment. This approach has many advantages, which include a shorter total treatment period, a high level of patient satisfaction due to immediate post-surgical facial improvement, easy postoperative orthodontic treatment due to early normalization of skeletal muscle, and the rapid tooth movement reflecting the regional accelerated phenomenon. However instability due to transient occlusal interference after surgery make worse of long-term skeletal stability. Especially increasing of vertical occlusion caused by interference of interbicupid and molar happen postsurgical skeletal change. Until now, there is no common consensus about treatment protocol of surgery first approach in orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this paper is to introduce our treatment protocol of the surgery first approach and to evaluate indication and limitation with case analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Son HB. FOS(Functional orthognathic surgery). Korean J Clin Ortho. 2002;1:7-9
  2. Hyon WS. Surgery-first orthognathic approach(SFOA) to prognathism:Indications and limitations.2008;66:39-40
  3. Nagasaka H. "Surgery first"skeletal class III correction using the skeletal anchorage system. J Clin Orthod. 2009;43:97-105
  4. Sugawara J. "Surgery first" orthognathics to correct a skeletal class II malocclusion with an impinging bite. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:429-438
  5. Yu CC. A surgery-first approach in surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism - a case report. Chang Gung med J. 2010;33:669-705
  6. Baek SH. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery:evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac surg. 2010;21(2):332-338 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4
  7. Yaffe A. Reginoal accerated phenomenon in the mandible following mucoperiosteal flap surgery. J periodontol. 1995;10:97-107
  8. Liou EJ. Surgery-first accelecerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:781-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035
  9. Hwang DS. Evaluation of skeletal stability following two-jaw surgery via surgery first orthodontic treatment treatment in class III malocclusion. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg;33(5):407-412
  10. Liou EJ. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:771-781 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011
  11. Juggins KJ. Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Detofacial Orthop. 2005;128:697-702 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.022
  12. Bos A. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial apperance in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacical Orthod. 2003;123:127-132 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.84
  13. Ahn KY. Skeletal Stability following 2-jaw surgery with and without Maxillary premolar extraction via surgery-first approach in Class III Malocclusion. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;38;235
  14. Lee JM. Correlation between Maxillary Cant and Dental Compensation in Facial Asymmetry using Cone-beam CT. The 21st annual meeting of the Japanese society for jaw deformities. 2012;17