Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Model for Estimating Social Cost of Mobile Emission Considering Geographical and Social Characteristics

지역 특성을 고려한 차량 배출물질의 사회적 비용 추정 모형

  • Lee, Kyu Jin (Tod-based Sustainable City.Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • Choi, Keechoo (Department of Transportation System Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 이규진 (아주대학교 TOD기반 지속가능 도시교통연구센터) ;
  • 최기주 (아주대학교 교통시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.30
  • Accepted : 2012.08.29
  • Published : 2012.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study proposed a model for estimating the unit value of social cost for mobile emission considering local geographical and social characteristics, together with a method to evaluate the air quality value. The model was built based on benefit transfer methods, the population density, and green space ratio of each area, which are reflected through independent variables. While applying the model, the unit value of social cost for mobile emissions in both densely populated areas of Seoul and Busan was found to be 18.68 times and 10.71 times higher than the national average, respectively. It is highly expected that this study can contribute to providing more reliable guidelines to decision makers when evaluating various green transportation policies and projects.

본 연구에서는 분석대상 지역의 특성을 고려한 차량 배출물질의 사회적 비용 원단위 추정 모형을 구축하였고, 이를 바탕으로 분석 대상지역의 대기질 가치를 평가하기 위한 방법론을 제시하였다. 구축 모형은 편익이전(Benefit Transfer)기법을 활용한 것으로, 각 지역의 인구밀도와 녹지율이 설명변수로 반영되었다. 본 모형을 적용한 결과, 인구가 밀집되어 있는 서울 지역과 부산 지역에 대한 차량 배출물질의 사회적 비용 원단위는 전국 평균치보다 각각 18.68배, 10.71배 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 최근의 녹색교통 정책에 대한 타당성을 판단함에 있어서 보다 신뢰도 있는 결과 도출에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abou-Ali H, Belha M. (2005), Does Benefit Transfer Always Work: A Multi-country Comparison, Working Paper in Economics No.158, Department of Economics, Gothenburg University.
  2. Ahn S. E., Kim J. G. (2006), An Application of Benefit Transfer to Outdoor Recreation Values in Korea, Korea Environment Institute.
  3. Anne Rozan (2004), Benefit Transfer: A Comparison of WTP for Air Quality between France and Germany, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.29, No.3, pp.295-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-5266-x
  4. Bae H. J., Kim M. H., Lee A. K., Park J. I. (2009), Acute Effects of PM10 on Asthma Hospitalization Among Children and Benefit Analysis at Four Major Cities in Korea, Kor J. Env. Hlth, pp.1-10.
  5. Boyle K. J., Bergstrom J. C. (1992), Benefit Transfer Studies: Myths, Pragmatism, and Idealism, Water Resources Research, Vol.28, No.3, pp.657-663. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02591
  6. Desvousges W. H., Johnson F. R., Banzhaf H. S. (1998), Environmental Policy Analysis With Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Desvousges W. H., Naughton M, Parsons G. (1992), Benefits Transfer: Conceptual Problems in Estimating Water Quality Benefits Using Existing Studies, Water Resources Research, Vol.28, No.3, pp.675- 683. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02592
  8. Downing M., Ozuna T. (1996), Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., Vol.30, pp.316-322. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0021
  9. Eom Y. S. (1998), Valuing Health Effects of Air Pollution; An Application of the Averting Behavior Method, Environmental Economic Review, Vol.7, No.1, pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938808800138
  10. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2003), Estimating Social Costs of Air Pollutions and Developing Emission Control Strategies for Kyonggi-Do.
  11. Holland M. R., Watkiss P. (2002), Benefits Table Database: Estimates of the Marginal External Costs of Air Pollution in Europe, BeTa Version E1.02a.
  12. IPCC (1995), Second Assessment Report: Climate Change
  13. Jeon D. H., Park G. H.,Jin Y. S., Jo J. M. (2004), Application of Contingent Valuation Method for Estimating Willingness-to-Pay in Planning the Integrated Sewerage System in the Catchment of Dam Chung-Ju, J. Environ Impact. Assess, Vol.13, No.2, pp.73-87.
  14. KAIST (1998), Reasonable Fuel Selection for District Heating in Clean Fuel Using Area 청정연료 사용지역 내에서 지역난방 차량연료의 합목적 선정에 관한 연구.
  15. Kim C. W. (1997), Measurement of Air Quality Value Inherented in House Price: Using Spatial Econometrics Model 주택가격에 내재된 대기질의 가격측정: 공간계량경제모형을 이용한 접근, Korea Resource Economics Association, Vol.7, No.1, pp.61-84.
  16. Korea Environment Institute (2002), A Comparative Study on the Environmental Aspects of the Surface Transportation.
  17. Korea Environment Institute (2008), Estimation of Health Benefits Resulted from Air Quality Improvement Policy by Korean BenMAP 한국형 BenMAP을 활용한 대기질 개선정책의 건강편익 산정 연구.
  18. Lim Y. S., Jeon Y. S. (1993), Estimation of Benefits Resulted from Air Quality Improvement by Hedonic Price Method 헤도닉 가격 기법을 이용한 대기질 개선시의 편익 추정, Korea Resource Economics Association, Vol.3, No.1.
  19. Loomis J. B. (1992), The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer, Water Resources Research, Vol.28, No.3, pp.701-705. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02596
  20. National Geographic Information Institute (2009), Cadastral Statistics Annual Report.
  21. National Institute of Environmental Research (2008), Vehicle Restriction Establishment to Improve Urban Air Quality 도심대기질 개선을 위한 차량통 행제한 설정 등을 위한 연구(II).
  22. Park J. I., Bae H. J. (2006), Assessing the Health Benefits of the Seoul Air Quality Management Plan Using BenMAP, Kor J. Env. Hlth. Vol.32, No.6, pp.571-577.
  23. Rhee H. C., Chung H. S., Kim T. Y. (2001), Valuation of Air Quality in the Metropolitan Seoul, J. Korean Econ. Stud., Vol.28, pp.117-138.
  24. Shin Y. C. (2002), Estimating the Cost of Air Pollution on Morbidity: Focusing on Hospital Visit for Acute Respiratory Diseases, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, Vol.11, No.4, pp.659-687.
  25. Stanley T. D. (2001), Wheat from Chaff: Meta-analysis as Quantitative Literature Review, J. Econ. Perspect., Vol.15, No.3, pp.131-150.
  26. Statistics Korea (2009), Population Projection by Region.
  27. The Korea Transportation Institute (2001), Valuation of Social Cost related to Transportation Environment (2nd Phase) 교통 환경 관련 사회적 비용의 계량화 (2단계).
  28. Tol R. S. J. (2009), The Economic Effects of Climate Change, J. Econ. Perspect.
  29. UNDP/GEF National Wetlands Center 국가습지보전사업관리단 (2008), National Wetlands Center (2008), Economical Value Evaluation of Major Wetlands in Korea 우리나라 주요 습지의 경제적 가치평가 연구.
  30. Yu S. H., Gwang S. J., Kim T. Y. (1999), Valuing Air Quality of Seoul: Contingent Valuation Method Based on Multi-Attribute Utility Theory, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, Vol.7, No.2, pp.243-271.
  31. Yu S. H., Gwang S. J., Lee J. S. (2003), Measuring the Environmental Costs of Air Pollution Impacts in Seoul: A Conjoint Analysis, Korea Regional Science Association, Vol.19, No.3, pp.1-17.

Cited by

  1. Comparison on Social Cost by Unit Calorific Value between Wood Pellets and Coals vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.4.403
  2. 수소경제 활성화 로드맵 달성에 따른 교통 부문의 대기오염원 저감 효과 분석 vol.31, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7316/khnes.2020.31.6.522