DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Cropping System and Application of Cattle Slurry on Forage Production and Environmental Pollution in Paddy Land

논에서 경작형태와 우분액비 시용이 사초생산성 및 환경오염에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Ki-Choon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Na, Sang-Pil (College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Jun (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Young-Chul (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Myeong-Hwa (College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Lak (College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Da-Hye (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Yook, Wan-Bang (College of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 최기춘 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 나상필 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김원호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최기준 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 임영철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김명화 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 이상락 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김다혜 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 육완방 (건국대학교 동물생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2012.07.06
  • Accepted : 2012.08.25
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the effects of forage cropping system and cattle slurry on productivity of whole crop rice, whole crop barley and Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrid and environmental pollution in paddy land. Forage cropping system used in this study was consisted of double-cropping whole crop barley followed by whole crop rice applied with cattle slurry (DWBRC) and double-cropping whole crop barley followed by Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrid applied with cattle slurry (DSSBC). The field experiments were conducted on the clay loam at Backsanmyun, Kimje, Chunlabukdo province in Korea for three years (May 2006 to Apr. 2009). This study was arranged in completely randomized design with three replicates. The field had been sown with whole crop rice 'Nampyung', Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrid 'Sordan79' and whole crop barley 'Younyang'. The yields of whole crop barley in DWBRC and DSSBC were 7,515 kg/ha and 8,515 kg/ha, respectively. The yields of whole crop barley in DSSBC significantly increased as compared with that of DWBRC (p<0.05). The contents of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), total digestible nutrient (TDN) of whole crop barley in DWBRC were not difference as compared with those of DSSBC. The pH, and contents of total nitrogen and organic matter in soil samples collected at the end of the experiment increased as compared with those at the beginning of the experiment (p<0.05). However, The content of phosphate in DWBRC was no difference as compared with DSSBC. In addition, after the end of experiment, the concentrations of exchangeable cations (Ca, Na, Mg and K) in soil samples collected at the end of the experiment were remarkably higher than those at the beginning of the experiment (p<0.05). The concentrations of $NH_4$-N, $NO_3$-N, $PO_4$-P, Cl, Ca, K, Mg and Na in leaching water were hardly influenced by the cropping system and application of cattle slurry.

본 연구는 논에서 조사료 생산을 위한 총체벼와 총체 영양보리 이모작 그리고 수수-수단그라스 교잡종과 총체 영양보리 이모작 재배시 우분액비 시용에 따른 총체 벼, 총체 영양보리, 수수-수단그라스 교잡종의 생산성, 사료가치, 토양성분 및 용탈수중의 무기물 농도를 조사하였다. 본 연구는 2006년 5월부터 2009년 4월까지 3년 동안 전라북도 김제군 백산면 시험포장에서 완전임의배치 3반복으로 수행되었다. 총체 벼의 후작으로 재배된 총체 영양보리의 2년간 평균 수량은 7,515 kg/ha이며 수수-수단그라스 교잡종의 후작으로 재배된 총체 영양보리의 2년간 평균 수량은 8,515 kg/ha으로 총체 영양보리의 수량은 수수-수단그라스 교잡종 이모작으로 재배한 경우가 총체 벼 후작에 비해 현저하게 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 수수-수단그라스 교잡종과 총체 영양보리 이모작에서 총체 영양보리의 조단백질함량, NDF, ADF 및 TDN 함량은 총체 벼 후작물로 재배된 총체 영양보리와 함량 차이가 나지 않았다. 경작형태별 우분액비 시용에 따른 토양 내 pH, 전질소, 유기물 함량은 시험 전에 비해 시험 종료 후에 현저하게 증가하는 경향을 나타냈다(p<0.05). 그러나 인산함량은 시험전후에 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 경작형태별 우분액비 시용에 따른 토양 내 칼슘, 나트륨, 마그네슘 및 칼리 농도는 시험 전에 비해 시험 종료 후에 현저하게 증가하는 경향을 나타냈다(p<0.05). 경작형태별 우분액비 시용에 따른 용탈수 중 암모니아성 질소, 질산성 질소, 인산염인, 염소, 칼슘, 칼리, 마그네슘, 나트륨의 농도는 경작형태에 따른 확실한 차이를 보여주지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Association of Offical Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  2. Campbell, C.M., M. Schnitzer, W.B. Stewart, J.V.O, Biederbeck and F. Selles. 1986. Effect of manure and fertilizer on properties of a Black Chernozem in southern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Soil Sci. 66:601-613. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss86-060
  3. Choi, K.C, W.B. Yook and C. Yoon. 2008. Effects of Swine Manure on The Production of Forage, Soil Properties, and the Chemical Characteristics of Leaching Water in Mixed Grassland. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 28(4):331-340. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.4.331
  4. Gilley, J.E., B. Eghball, J.M. Blumenthal and D.D. Baltensperger. 1999. Runoff and erosion from interrill areas as affected by the aoolication of manure. Transactions of the ASEA 42(4):975-980. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13278
  5. Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
  6. Jarvis, S.C., AM. Sherwood and J.H. Steenvoorden. 1987. Notrogen losses from animal manures from grazed pastures and from applied slurry. In: Van Der Meer, H.G., Unwin R.J., Van Dijk T.A. and Ennik G.C. (eds). Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops. Fertilizer or Waste pp 195-212. Dordrecht, the Netherlands : Martinus Nijhoff.
  7. Hariston, J.E., J.O. Sanford, D.F. Pope and D.A. Horneck. 1987. Soybean-wheat double cropping : Implications from strew management and supplemental nitrogen. Agron. J. 79:281-286. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020021x
  8. Kim, J.G., E.S. Chung, J.K. Lee, Y.C. Lim, S.H. Yoon and M.J. Kim. 2009. Comparison of yield and quality of direct-seeded whole crop rice. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 29(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.025
  9. Legg, J.O. and J.J. Meisinger. 1982. Soil nutrition budgets in nitrogen in agricultural soils. In: FJ. Stevenson ed.) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Agron. Monogr. 22. ASA, CSSA, Madison, WI.
  10. Lim, Y.C., S.H. Yoon, M.W. Jung, W.H. Kim, J.G. Kim, J.K. Lee, S. Seo, N.G. Park and W.B. Yook. 2007. Effect of Livestock Manure Application on the Productivity of Whole Crop Rice, Feed Value and Soil Fertility. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 27(4):287-296. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.4.287
  11. Lim, Y.C., S.H. Yoon, W.H. Kim, J.G. Kim, J.S. Shin, M.W. Jung, S. Seo and W.B. Yook. 2006. Effects of Livestock Manure Application on Growth Characteristics, Yield and Feed Value of Sorghum-sudangrass Hybrid and NO3-N Leaching in Paddy Field. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 26(4):233-238. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.4.233
  12. Long, F.N.J. and H.I. Gracey. 1990. Herbage prodution and nitrogen recovery from slurry injection and fertilizer nitrogen application. Grass and Forage Science 45:77-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1990.tb02184.x
  13. McCalla, T.M. 1974. Use of animal manure wastes as a soil amendment. J. Soil Water Conserv. 29:213-216.
  14. Pye, V.I. 1983. Groundwater contamination in the United States. Workshop on groundwater Resources and Contamination in the United States (Summary and Papers). Natl. Sci. Foundation. Washington DC.
  15. Sommerfeldt, T.G. and C. Chang. 1985. Changes in soil properties under annual applications of feedlot manure and different tillage practices. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 549:983-987.
  16. Sommerfeldt, T.G. and C. Chang. 1987. Soilwater properties as affected by twelve annual applications of cattle feedlot manure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:7-9. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100010002x
  17. Sommerfeldt, T.G., C. Chang and T. Entz. 1988. Long-term annual manure applications increase soil organic matter and nitrogen and decrease carbon to nitrogen ratio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52: 1667-1672.
  18. Yook, W.B., K.C. Choi, S.H. An and J.K. Lee. 1999 Effects of Application Seasons and Levels of Cattle Slurry on Nitrate Contents in Soils of Rye Cultivation. J. Kor. Grassl. Sci. 19(2)141-146.