DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of the Level of Awareness of Teachers Regarding Future Learning Environments

학습환경으로서 미래교육시설구성에 대한 교사 인식 연구

  • Received : 2012.05.29
  • Accepted : 2012.07.19
  • Published : 2012.07.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gauge the level of awareness of elementary, middle school, and highschool teachers regarding teaching-learning activities, learning space, and support for technology-based instruction in current and future school education, thereby providing essential data for seeking future improvements in the learning environment. Towards this end, a survey questionnaire (sectionalized into teaching-learning activities, learning space, and support for technology-based instruction) was developed. Subsequently the survey was administered to a random sampling of elementary, middle school, and highschool teachers in the Kyonggi, Kangwon, and Chonra Provinces. An in-depth analysis was conducted on the 797 questionnaire responses thus attained, focusing on the teachers' level of awareness regarding teaching-learning activities, learning space, and support for technology-based instruction, the correlation of the findings of the three areas in question, and the differences of the findings according to the circumstances of those surveyed. Based on the results, the authors of this study propose the following: First, that school administrators take into account the level of awareness of frontline teachers regarding teaching-learning activities, learning space, support for technology-based instruction. Second, efforts should be made to establish a safe and secure learning environment conducive to the synergic interplay of the three areas in question, by realizing true ICT in the classroom. Third, teachers in the classroom must endeavor to achieve a meaningful synthesis between educational programs and teaching-learning activities, as well as to serve as harbingers of improvements in the way we conduct the business of education.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영록. 교육에 영향을 미치 미래 첨단 기술 소개 "The 2010 Horizon Report: K-12 Edition"를 중심으로. 한국교육학술정보원 연구자료 RM 2010-11. 2010
  2. Green, H. & Hannon, C., Their space: Education for a digital generation, London; Demos, 2007
  3. 강인애, 왜 구성주의인가, 서울: 문음사, 1997
  4. Jonassen, D., Learning to troubleshoot: A new theorybased design architecture, Educational Psychology Review, V. 18, n. 1, 77-114, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9001-8
  5. 돈 탭스콧(지음), 이진원(역), 디지털 네이티브, 서울: 비즈니스북스, 2009
  6. SteelCase, Learning environment for information age. 2006. (http://www.steelcase.com/na/files/0054a4f44ee0406 5b615c35151ccbcc6/Fullversionofthisstory.pdf, 2012. 5. 5.)
  7. Nair, P., Schools for 21st century: Are you ready?, The journal of the OECD programme on educational building, v. 42, 23-24, 2001
  8. Lomas, C. & Oblinger, D., Student practices and their impact on learning space, in Oblinger, D.(Ed), Learning space, Educause, 2006. (http://www.educause.edu/learningspacesch5, 2012, 5. 6.)
  9. 김현진, 박인우, 고범석, 서수민, 김현영. 테크놀로지 기반 첨단 미래학교 예측 연구. 한국교육학술정보원 연구보고 RR 2009-12. 2009
  10. 대통령자문 교육혁신위원회. 학습사회 실현을 위한 미래 교육 비전과 전략. 2007
  11. 강기수, 김회규, 최신교사론, 서울: 동문사. 2011

Cited by

  1. Design Guidelines for the Mixed-use Development Types of Elementary School with Public Housing vol.32, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.6107/jkha.2021.32.5.029