Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회논문집)

The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decision Making Model for Agricultural Reservoir using PROMETHEE-AHP

PROMETHEE-AHP를 이용한 농업용 저수지의 의사결정모형

  • 최은혁 (한국농어촌공사 기술본부, 영남대학교 대학원) ;
  • 배상수 (한국농어촌공사 기술본부) ;
  • 지홍기 (영남대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2012.06.27
  • Accepted : 2012.08.28
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. Cathy Macharis, Johan Springael, Klaas De Brucker, and Alian Verbeke, 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP : The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 153(2): 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X
  2. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. S., 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making : METHods and Applications. Berlin, Springer.
  3. Jang, R. H., 2003. The decision making supporting system to set efficient weights in making a decision using AHP. Master's diss., Sungkyunkwan University (in Korean).
  4. Jeong, J. A., 1999. Development of evaluation criteria and procedure for the selection of weighting method in multi-criteria decision making. Ph.D. diss., Dongguk University (in Korean).
  5. J. P. Brans, and PH. Vincke, 1985. A preference ranking organization method. Management Science 2(6): 647-656.
  6. Keyser, W. D., and Peeters, P., 1996. A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria method. European Journal of Operational Research 89: 457-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00307-6
  7. Kim, J. H., 2009. Multicriteria decision making method of PROMETHEE. Master's diss., Ajou University (in Korean).
  8. Lee, C. S., 2007. Decision making model for most preferable alternative in basin-wide flood damage reduction planning. Ph.D. diss., Inha University (in Korean).
  9. Lee, J. Y., Yoon, Y. S., Jang, M. H., and Seo, S. W., 2010. Analysis of the schedule risk using PROMETHEE in building construction management. Journal of Korea Construction Engineering and management 11(2): 25-34. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2010.11.2.25
  10. Min, J. H., and Song, Y. M., 2003. PROMETHEE for multicriteria decision making, Sogang Journal of Business 14(2): 109-127 (in Korean).
  11. Olson, D. L. 1996. Decision Aids for Selection Problems, New York, Springer.
  12. Roy, B. and Hugonnard, J. C., 1982. Ranking of subburban line extension projects on the paris metro system by a multicriteria method. Transportation Research 16(4): 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(82)90057-7
  13. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGrow-Hill.
  14. Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple criteria decision making : Part II Multi-plant strategy and plant relocation. International Journal of Production Research 23(2): 361-370.