Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Korean Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Scientific Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic Template

  • Received : 2012.08.08
  • Accepted : 2012.09.24
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of pre-service elementary teachers' understanding about scientific inquiry in terms of designing exploration and reasoning that is used to formulate explanations based on evidence. The research context was an open inquiry with using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) template in which participant students were not provided with inquiry questions. As data, lab. 39 pre-service elementary teachers participated in this study while taking their science methods course. Analyses of the reports were framed by the cognitive processes of inquiry (Chinn and Malhotra, 2002) and each report was coded and analyzed by the framework of inquiry (Tytler and Peterson, 2004). Results showed that groups' works that utilized the SWH template encouraged the participants to interact each other about scientific inquiry. They came up with more relevant and testable questions for their scientific inquiry. It implicates that children will be able to have chances of testing their own questions more properly by using the SWH template in science classes just as the participants did in this study. The use of the SWH template would help pre-service teachers to teach appropriately how to test inquiry questions to their students in the future. Discussion was made to figure out the characteristics or Korean pre-service elementary teachers' understanding about scientific inquiry.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., and Tuan, H.-L., 2004, Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
  2. Bobbitt, J.F., 1926, Curriculum investigations. University of Chicago, IL, USA, 204 p.
  3. Chinn, C.A. and Malhotra, B.A., 2002, Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  4. Grandy, R. and Duschl, R.A., 2007, Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Science and Education, 16, 141-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z
  5. Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., and Bintz, J., 2006, When science and literacy meet in the secondary learning space: Implementing the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH). Draft Copy, University of Iowa, IA, USA.
  6. Lee, S.K., Lee, K.H., Choi, C.I., and Shin, M.K., 2012, Analyzing coordination of theory and evidence presented in pre-service elementary teachers' science writing for inquiry activities. Journal of Korea Association of Science Education, 32, 201-209. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.201
  7. McNeil, K.L., 2011, Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 793-823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430
  8. Millar, R., 1989, What is 'scientific method' and can it be taught? (ch3). In Wellington, J. (eds.), Skills and processes in science education: A critical analysis. Routledge, London, UK, 47-62.
  9. National Research Council (NRC), 1996, National science education standards. National Academy Press, WA, USA, 272 p.
  10. National Research Council (NRC), 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, WA, USA, 202 p
  11. Norris, S. and Phillips, L., 2005, Reading as Inquiry. NSF Inquiry Conference Proceedings, http://www.ruf.rice.edu/rgrandy/NSFConSched.html (October 23th 2007)
  12. Polanyi, M., 1958, Personal Knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK, 428 p.
  13. Ravetz, J.R., 1971, Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 449 p.
  14. Tytler, R. and Peterson, S., 2004, From "try it and see" to strategic exploration: characterizing young children's scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 94-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10126

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of the Effects of Learning Stress for Inquiry Activities in College Earth Science Course vol.39, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.4.349