Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influences of Enneagram Personality Types on OPAC Searching and Satisfaction

에니어그램 성격 유형에 따른 OPAC 탐색 성향과 만족도

  • 정영미 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2012.08.21
  • Accepted : 2012.09.16
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the relation between personality types and users' searching trait and satisfaction when interacting with OPAC system. In this study, personality type was measured by the KEPTI Enneagram tools. Data was collected through four questionnaires, pre-test, TaskA, TaskB, and post-test survey. The results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in perceptions on the expected ease of search, completion time, adequacy of search time, usefulness of search results, and performed ease of search within the Three Triads of Enneagram. Also a statistically significant difference was found on familiarity and interest in the selected queries within the Hornivian group.

본 연구의 목적은 이용자의 인지적 특성 중 하나인 성격 유형과 OPAC 탐색 과정에서 나타나는 이용자의 정보 탐색 성향 및 만족도의 관계를 파악하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 실험대상자들을 대상으로 KEPTI 에니어그램 검사를 통해 성격 유형을 파악하였고, 데이터는 실험-전 질문지, 태스크A 질문지, 태스크B 질문지, 그리고 실험-후 질문지로 수집되었다. 분석결과, 에니어그램의 힘의 중심에 의한 집단 간에는 탐색의 용이성, 탐색시간, 탐색시간의 충분성, 탐색결과의 유용성, 탐색과정의 쉬움에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타났고 호니비언 집단 간에는 질의에 대한 친숙성과 흥미에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단

References

  1. 구중억, 곽승진 (2007). 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 61-88.(Gu, Jung-Eok, & Kwak, Seung-Jin (2007). A study on next generation OPAC's interface and function. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 18(2), 61-88.)
  2. 권용주, 김지현 (2006). 에니어그램과 여행동기의 상관관계. 제60차 한국관광학회 학술대회논문집, 47-60.(Kwon, Yong-Ju, & Kim, Jee-Hyeon (2006). Correlation between Enneagram and travel motivation. Proceedings of the 60th Conference of the Tourism Sciences Society of Korea, 47-60.)
  3. 김희섭 (2004). Web OPAC 이용패턴과 MBTI 성격 유형의 상관관계. 한국도서관정보학회지, 35(4), 229-250.(Kim, Heesop (2004). Correlation between web OPAC use patterns and MBTI personality types. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(4), 229-250.)
  4. 반경진, 김효동, 이경원, 김현희 (2007). 사용자 맞춤형 인터페이스가 몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 인포디자인이슈, 11, 31-42.(Bahn, Kyounjin, Kim, Hyo, Lee, Kyungwon, & Kim, Hyunhee (2007). A study on effect on flow of customized user interface in game, "WOW". InfoDesign Issue, 11, 31-42.)
  5. 사공복희 (2003). 웹기반 온라인 목록의 이용행태 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 81-110.(Sakong, Bok-Hee (2003). A study on the searching behavior of web-based OPAC users. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 20(3), 81-110.)
  6. 서은경 (2000). OPAC의 기능성 및 인터페이스 유용성 평가에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 17(4), 187-206.(Seo, Eun-Gyoung (2000). An evaluation of functional capabilities and interface features of OPAC systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 17(4), 187-206.)
  7. 안영선, 이은철 (1999). 대학도서관 Web OPAC 서지정보 인터페이스에 관한 연구. 제6회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 117-120.(Ahn, Young-Sun, & Lee, Eun-Chul (1999). A study of web OPAC interfaces in academic libraries. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 117-120.)
  8. 윤운성 (2003). 한국형 에니어그램 검사의 해석과 활용. 서울: 한국에니어그램교육연구소.(Youn, Un-Sung (2003). The interpretation and use of Korean enneagram personality type indicator. Seoul: Korean Enneagram Education Center.)
  9. 이두이, 구연배 (2008). 전문대학도서관 사서의 성격 유형과 직무만족도에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지, 39(3), 119-137.(Lee, Du-Yi, & Koo, Yeen-Bai (2008). A study on the junior college librarians personality type and job satisfaction. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(3), 119-137.)
  10. 이제환, 이현주 (1998). OPAC 이용자 인터페이스의 품질 평가: SOLARS를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(1), 69-96.(Lee, Jae-Whoan, & Lee, Hyun-Joo (1998). An evaluation on the quality of OPAC user interface: the case of the SUN's SOLARS. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 32(1), 69-96.)
  11. 정희정 (2006). 대학생의 에니어그램 성격 유형별 자기표현과 촉진적 의사소통에 관한 연구. 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 17(4), 163-173.(Chung, Hee-Jung (2006). A study on self-expression and facilitative communication by enneatype among university students. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science Society Officers, 17(4), 163-173.)
  12. Babu, B. R., & O'Brien, A. (2000). Web OPAC interfaces: An overview. The Electronic Library, 18(5), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470010354572
  13. Bellardo, T. (1985). An investigation of online searcher traits and their relationship to search outcome. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360404
  14. Chisman, J., Diller, K., & Walbridge, S. (1999). Usability testing: A case study. College & Research Libraries, 60(6), 552-569. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.6.552
  15. Heinstrӧm, J. (2003). Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour. Information Research, 9(1). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html
  16. Kani-Zabihi, E., Ghinea, G., & Chen, S. Y. (2008). User perceptions of online public library catalogues. International Journal of Information Management, 28(6), 492-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.007
  17. Mi, J., & Weng, C. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC: Interface, searching, and display challenges. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 5-22.
  18. Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III: Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198805)39:3<197::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-A
  19. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55. Retrieved from http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf
  20. Zhang, Xiangmin, & Han, Hui (2005). An empirical testing of user stereotypes of information retrieval systems. Information Processing and Management, 41(3), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.01.005

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Difference of Preferred Loan Books According to Personality Types of Children and Adolescents vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.255
  2. The Influence of Enneagram Personality Styles on Information Seeking Behaviors of Undergraduate Students of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies vol.48, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.3.237