DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors on the Gap between Predicted Cesarean Section Rate and Real Cesarean Section Rate in Tertiary Hospitals

상급종합병원의 예측 제왕절개분만율과 실제 제왕절개분만율의 격차 관련요인

  • Received : 2012.07.18
  • Accepted : 2012.09.14
  • Published : 2012.09.20

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to examine the gap between predicted cesarean section rate and real cesarean section rate and it's determining factors of 44 tertiary hospitals. Method: This study is a cross-sectional analysis using the data of 25,623 deliveries in 2009 drawn from homepage of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Data were analyzed with t-test, F-test, Scheff$\acute{e}$ test, and logistic regression. Result: There were statistically significant differences in the gap of cesarean section rate (more gap indicates higher quality of delivery) by grade of nurse staffing and delivery cases. Hospitals with nurse staffing grade 1 to 2 had more possibility to be classified into higher grade in quality of delivery (OR 5.67, 95% CI 1.07-30.08). Also hospitals with over 500 delivery cases had more possibility be classified into higher grade in quality of delivery (OR 4.92, 95% CI 1.14-21.23, respectively). Conclusion: The finding suggests that grade of nurse staffing may influence the real cesarean section rate because nurses do a vital role to prevent unnecessary cesarean section. Further study is required to provide evidence that nurse staffing influence on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness in order to obtain adequate number of nursing staffs.

Keywords

References

  1. AbouZahr, C., & Wardlaw, T. (2001). Maternal mortality at the end of a decade signs of progress? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 561-568.
  2. Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Lake, E. T., & Cheney, T. (2008). Effects of hospital care environments on patient mortality and nurse outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration, 38, 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA. 0000312773.42352.d7PMCID: PMC2586978
  3. Almeida, S., Bettiol, H., Barbieri, M. A., Silva, A. A., & Ribeiro, V. S. (2008). Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 24, 2909-2918. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2008001200020
  4. Buchan, J. (2004). A certain ratio? Minimum staffing ratios in nursing: A report for the Royal College of Nursing. London: RCN.
  5. Chalmers, B., Mangiaterra, V., & Porter, R. (2001). WHO principles of perinatal care: The essential antenatal, perinatal, and postpartum care course. Birth, 28, 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00202.x
  6. Chen, C. S., Lin, H. C., Liu, T. C., Lin, S. Y., & Pfeiffer, S. (2008). Urbanization and the likelihood of a cesarean section. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 141, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.016
  7. Childbirth Connection. (2006). Listening to mothers II: Report of the second national U.S. survey of women's childbearing experiences. America: Author
  8. Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., Yelland, J., Rayner, J., Lumley, J., & Davey, M. A. (2006). Staffing in postnatal units: Is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia. BioMedCentral Health Services Research, 6, 83. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-83
  9. Garcia, F. A., Miller, H. B., Hugginns, G. R., & Gordon, T. A. (2001). Effects of academic affiliation and obstetric volume on clinical outcome and cost of childbirth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologies, 97, 567-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01219-9
  10. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. (2009a). Evaluation and follow up report on cesarean section in Korea. Seoul: Author.
  11. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. (2011). Cesarean section rate evaluation result by hospitals. Retrieved June 1, 2011, from http://www.hira.or.kr/rec_infopub.hospinfo.do? method=listDiagEvl&pgmid=HIRAA030004000000
  12. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. (2009b). Nurse staffing grade by hospitals. Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.hira.or.kr/rdc_hospsearch.hospsearch.do? method=hospital&pgmid=HIRAA030002000000
  13. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. (2010). 2010 report about appropriateness of cesarean: Preliminary test payment for performance. Seoul: Author.
  14. Hodnett, E. D., Stremle, R., Willan, A. R., Weston, J. A., Lowe, N. K., Simpson, K. R., et al., SELAN (Structured Early Labour Assessment and Care by Nurses) Trial Group. (2008). Effect on birth outcomes of a formalized approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: International, randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337, a1021. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1021
  15. Hopkins, K. (2000). Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Social Science and Medicine, 51, 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00480-3
  16. Hugonnet, S., Villaveces, A., & Pittet, D. (2007). Nurse staffing level and nosocomial infections: Empirical evaluation of the casecrossover and case-time-control designs. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 1321-1327. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm041
  17. Kane, R. L., Shamliyan, T., Mueller, C., Duval, S., & Witt, T. (2007). Nursing staffing and quality of patient care. AHRQ publication 07-E005. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research.
  18. Kim, Y. M., & Go, S. K. (2002). Factors Determining Cesarean Section Frequency Rates of the OBGY Clinics in Metropolitan Area. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 18 , 389-401.
  19. Kim, Y. M., Cho, D. S., Cha, B. H., Hur, M. H., Oh, H. S., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). A study of the health policy for the cesarean section rate reduction. Seoul: Ministry for Health and Welfare.
  20. Kim, Y. M., Kim, J. Y., June, K. J., & Ham, E. O. (2010). Changing trend in grade of nursing management fee by hospital characteristics: 2008-2010. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research, 16, 99-109.
  21. Lee, S. I., Khang, Y. H., Yun, S., & Jo, M. W. (2005). Rising rates, changing relationships: caesarean section and its correlates in South Korea, 1988-2000. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 112, 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00535.x
  22. Liberto, J., Peiróエ, S., & Calderóヌn, S. M. (2000). Inter-hospital variations in cesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 631-636. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.8.631
  23. Lin, H. C., Xirasagar, S., & Liu, T. C. (2007). Doctors' obstetric experience and Caesarean section (CS): Does increasing delivery volume result in lower CS likelihood? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13, 954-957.
  24. Ministry for Health and Welfare. (2006). Notification No. 2006- 105. 2006. 12.18.
  25. Ontario Women's Health Council. (2000). Attaining and maintaining best practices in the use of caesarean sections-An analysis of four Ontario hospitals. Toronto, Ontario: Author.
  26. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). 2009 Health data CD.
  27. Park, J. O., Kim, H. Y., Roh, G. S., Roh, Y. D., Park, M. B., So, J. E., et al. (2010). Comparison of nursing activity time according to the change in grade of nursing management fee in one university hospital. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research, 16, 95-105.
  28. Wax, J. R., Cartin, A., Pinette, M. G., & Blackstone, J. (2005). Patient choice cesarean-the Maine experience. Birth, 32, 203-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2005.370_1.x
  29. West, E., Mays, N., Rafferty, A. M., Rowan, K., & Sanderson, C. (2009). Nursing resources and patient outcomes in intensive care: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46 , 993-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.011
  30. Yun, S. G., Park, Y. J., Kim, K. H., & Han, C. H. (2010). Evaluation on the performance of nursing in according to the nursing grade of hospitals. Korean Journal of Hospital Management, 15 (3), 1-16.

Cited by

  1. Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis vol.9, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356