DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Performance of Wood-Concrete Composite II - Shear Performance with Different Anchorage Length of Steel Rebar in Concrete -

  • Lee, Sang-Joon (Division of Wood Engineering, Department of Forest Resources Utilization, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Eom, Chang-Deuk (Division of Wood Engineering, Department of Forest Resources Utilization, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Mo (Division of Wood Engineering, Department of Forest Resources Utilization, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2012.09.06
  • Accepted : 2012.09.18
  • Published : 2012.09.25

Abstract

Wood and concrete show significantly different physical properties, and it need to be firstly understood for using wood-concrete composite. This study is performed for compensating this and effective hybridization of wood and concrete. This research in planned for wood-concrete composite after previous research which deals the shear performance with different anchorage length of steel rebar in wood. Yield mode and reference design value (Z) were derived using EYM (European Yield Model). And the yield mode changed before and after anchorage length of 10~15 mm - $I_s$ mode to IV mode. There was not increasing tendency of shear performance with increased anchorage length for over 20 mm of anchorage in concrete. And wood composite shows 65% and 93% on initial stiffness and yield load respectively compared with the wood-concrete composite. Wood-concrete composite showed brittle failure after yield point while wood-to-wood composite showed ductile failure.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부. 2008. 도로설계편람 제5편 교량.
  2. 대한건축학회. 2008. 목조건축구조설계매뉴얼 (KBC Wood Design Manual).
  3. 대한토목학회 교량설계핵심기술연구단. 2008. 도로교 설계기준 해설.
  4. 한국표준협회. 2007. 레디믹스트 콘크리트. KS F 4009.
  5. An, H. J., S. C. Kim, Y. J. Moon, and I. S. Yang. 2008. Experimental study of composite beams consisting structural laminated timber beam with concrete slab. 2008 Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Annual Meeting, Vol 20(1): 233-236.
  6. Balogh, J., M. Fragiacomo, N. Miller, R. Gutkowski, and R. Atadero. 2010. Testing of Wood- Concrete Composite Beams with Shear Key Detail. Proceedings of International Conference on Timber Bridges, Lillehammer, Norway pp. 393-398.
  7. Bathon, L. and O. Bletz-Muhldorfer. 2010. Performance of single span wood-concrete-composite bridges under dynamic loading. Proceedings of International Conference on Timber Bridges, Lillehammer, Norway pp. 399-402.
  8. Construction and Maintenance Branch. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. 2009. Standard Specification for Highway Construction.
  9. Customary U.S. Units 4th Edition. 2007. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
  10. Gutkowski, R., K. Brown, A. Shigidi, and J. Natterer. 2008. Laboratory tests of composite wood-concrete beams. Construction and Building Materials 22: 1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.013
  11. Nunes, J. L. and C. J. Carlito. 2008. Field Load Test Behavior of Composite Log-Concrete Bridge - P01. Proceedings of the 51st International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, Chile WS-36.
  12. Julita, A. and L. Salokangas. 2010. Wood-Concrete Composite Beams - Finnish Speciality in the Nordic Countries. Proceedings of International Conference on Timber Bridges, Lillehammer, Norway pp. 383-392.
  13. Ritter M. A. 1990. Timber Bridge: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. U. S. Department of Agriculture, U. S. Forest Service, EM 7700-8.
  14. Lee, S.-J., C.-D. Eom, and K.-M. Kim. 2012. Shear Performance of Wood-Concrete Composite I - Shear Performance with Different Anchorage Length of Steel Rebar in Wood. J. Korean Wood Sci. & Tech. 40(3): 186-193. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2012.40.3.186
  15. Yeah, D., M. Fragiacomo, M. De Franceschi, and K. H. Boon. 2011. State of the Art on Timber- Concrete Composite Structures: Literature Review. Journal of Structural Engineering 137(10): 1085-1095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000353