DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Evaluation of Shared Medical Decision-Making Scale for End-of-Life Patients in Korea

한국형 공유 의료적 의사 결정 측정도구 개발 및 평가

  • Jo, Kae-Hwa (Catholic University of Daegu, College of Nursing)
  • Received : 2012.01.11
  • Accepted : 2012.07.09
  • Published : 2012.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The study was done to develop a shared decision-making scale for end-of-life patients in Korea. Methods: The process included construction of a conceptual framework, generation of initial items, verification of content validity, selection of secondary items, preliminary study, and extraction of final items. The participants were 388 adults who lived in one of 3 Korean metropolitan cities: Seoul, Daegu, or Busan. Item analysis, factor analysis, criterion related validity, and internal consistency were used to analyze the data. Data collection was done from July to October 2011. Results: Thirty-four items were selected for the final scale, and categorized into 7 factors explaining 61.9% of the total variance. The factors were labeled as sharing information (9 items), constructing system (7 items), explanation as a duty (5 items), autonomy (4 items), capturing time (3 items), participation of family (3 items), and human respect (3 items). The scores for the scale were significantly correlated among shared decision-making scale, terminating life support scale, and dignified dying scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 34 items was .94. Conclusion: The above findings indicate that the shared decision-making scale has a good validity and reliability when used for end-of-life patients in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Briggs, L., & Colvin, E. (2002). The nurse's role in end-of-life decision-making for patients and families. Geriatric Nursing, 23, 302-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mgn.2002.130271
  2. Byun, E. K., Choi, H. R., Choi, A. L., Kim, N. M., Hong, K. H., & Kim, H. S. (2003). An investigative research on the attitudes of intensive care unit nurses and families on terminating life support. Clinical Nursing Research, 9(1), 112-124.
  3. Costello, J. (2001). Nursing older dying patients: Findings from an ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648. 2001.01822.x
  4. Elwyn, G., Hutchings, H., Edwards, A., Rapport, F., Wensing, M., Cheung, W., et al. (2005). The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expectations, 8, 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x
  5. Frank, R. K. (2009). Shared decision making and its role in end of life care. British Journal of Nursing, 18, 612-618. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2009.18.10.42466
  6. Hilden, H., & Honkasalo, M. (2006). Finnish nurses' interpretations of patient autonomy in the context of end-of-life decision making. Nursing Ethics, 13, 41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0969733006ne856oa
  7. Hilden, H., Louhiala, P., Honkasalo, M., & Palo, J. (2004). Finnish nurses' views on end-of-life discussions and a comparison with physicians' views. Nursing Ethics, 11, 165-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/096 9733004ne681oa
  8. Holcomb, L. E., Neimeyer, R. A., & Moore, M. K. (1993). Personal meanings of death: A content analysis of free-response narratives. Death Studies, 17, 299-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07481189308252627
  9. Jo, K. H. (2010). Nurse's conflict experience toward end-of-life medical decision-making. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing, 22, 488-498.
  10. Jo, K. H. (2011). Development and evaluation of a dignified dying scale for Korean adults. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41, 313-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.313.
  11. Jo, K. H., An, G. J., & Kim, G. M. (2011). Future changes and directions for the construction of Medical Decision-Making System in Korea: Focused on delphi surveys. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 14, 44-54.
  12. Johnston, B., & Smith, L. N. (2006). Nurses' and patients' perceptions of expert palliative nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54, 700-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03857.x
  13. Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Holzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A., & Harter, M. (2010). The 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034
  14. Lee, S. M., Kim, S. Y., & Lee, H. S. (2009). The process of medical decisionmaking for cancer patients. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics, 12, 1-14.
  15. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.
  16. Meraviglia, M. G., McGuire, C., & Chesley, D. A. (2003). Nurses' needs for education on cancer and end-of-life care. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 34, 122-127.
  17. Nordgen, L., & Olsson, H. (2004). Palliative care in a coronary care unit: A qualitative study of physicians' and nurses' perceptions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 185-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702. 2004.00816.x
  18. Norton, S. A., & Talerico, K. A. (2000). Facilitating end of life decision making strategies for communicating and assessing. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 26, 6-13.
  19. Ryu, C. S. (2006). SPSS 14.0 for windows (5th ed.). Seoul: Elite.
  20. Scherer, Y., Jezewski, M. A., Graves, B., Wu, Y. B., & Bu, X. (2006). Advanced directives and end-of-life decision making: Survey of critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes and experience. Critical Care Nurse, 26(6), 30-40.
  21. Simon, D., Schorr, G., Wirtz, M., Vodermaier, A., Caspari, C., Neuner, B., et al. (2006). Development and first validation of the shared decisionmaking questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 319-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012
  22. Song, S. J. (2001). Characteristics of Korean family and family therapy. Korean Journal of Family Therapy, 9, 1-20.
  23. Stacey, D., Legare, F., Pouliot, S., Kryworuchko, J., & Dunn, S. (2010). Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: A theory analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 164-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015
  24. Stacey, D., Murray, M. A., Legare, F., Sandy, D., Menard, P., & O'Connor, A. (2008). Decision coaching to support shared decision making: A framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5, 25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00108.x
  25. Suh, W. S., & Lee, C. (2010). Impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 43, 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.1.26
  26. Weissman, D. E. (2004). Decision making at a time of crisis near the end of life. Journal of American Medical Association, 292, 1738-1743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.14.1738
  27. Willard, C., & Luker, K. (2006). Challenges to end of life care in the acute hospital setting. Palliative Medicine, 20, 611-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216306071064
  28. Winter, L., & Parks, S. M. (2008). Family discord and proxy decision makers' end-of-life treatment decisions. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 11, 1109-1114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.0039

Cited by

  1. Factors Affecting Shared Decision Making at End of Life in Korean Adults vol.27, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/hnp.0b013e3182a72c34
  2. 만성질환자의 특성에 따른 생애말기치료 선호도 vol.25, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.2.207
  3. 간호사의 품위 있는 죽음태도와 도덕적 민감성 정도가 임종간호수행에 미치는 영향 vol.16, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2013.16.4.223
  4. 말기 환자의 공유 의료적 의사결정에 관한 의료인의 인식 유형 vol.17, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2014.17.4.278
  5. Health Care Professional Factors Influencing Shared Medical Decision Making in Korea vol.5, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015614608
  6. 중년기 성인의 호스피스 완화의료와 공유의사결정에 대한 인식 및 요구도 vol.19, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2016.19.4.310
  7. 만성질환자의 공유의사결정 개념분석 vol.10, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2019.10.11.543
  8. An exploratory study on the shared decision-making as a two-way symmetrical communication process : focusing on the communication of kidney dialysis patients vol.65, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2021.65.2.005