A Comparative Study on the Parthenogenetic Development of Pig Oocytes Cultured in North Carolina State University-23 and Porcine Zygote Medium-3

  • Lee, Joo-Hyeong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Hyun, Sang-Hwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Song (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2012.05.18
  • Accepted : 2012.06.08
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of in vitro culture media on embryonic development of in vitro-matured (IVM) oocytes after parthenogenetic activation (PA) in pigs. Immature pig oocytes were matured in TCM-199 supplemented with porcine follicular fluid, cysteine, pyruvate, EGF, insulin, and hormones for the first 22 h and then further cultured in hormone-free medium for an additional 22~26 h. IVM oocytes were activated by electric pulses and cultured in porcine zygote medium-3 (PZM-3) and North Carolina State University-23 supplemented with essential and non-essential amino acids (NCSU-23aa). These media were further modified by supplementing 2.77 mM myo-inositol, 0.34 mM trisodium citrate, and $10{\mu}M$ ${\beta}$-mercaptoethanol (designated as mPZM-3 and mNCSU-23aa, respectively). Culture of PA embryos in mPZM-3 significantly increased development to the blastocyst stage than culture in NCSU-23aa (36.2% vs. 24.8%, p<0.05). Modified PZM-3 showed a significantly higher blastocyst formation than NCSU-23aa in both groups of embryos that were activated at 44 h and 48 h of IVM (51.0% vs. 35.5% and 49.0% vs. 34.2% in oocytes activated at 44 h and 48 h of IVM, respectively). Irrespective of the follicle diameter where oocytes were collected, embryonic development to the blastocyst stage was increased (p<0.05) by the culture in mPZM-3 compared to culture in NCSU-23aa (25.9% vs. 34.2% and 32.9% vs. 44.8% in embryos derived from small and medium size follicles, respectively). Our results demonstrated that culture media had significant effect on preimplantation development PA embryos and that mPZM-3 was superior to mNCSU-23 in supporting development to the blastocyst stage in pigs. This beneficial effect of mPZM-3 on embryonic development was not impaired by other factors such as time of oocyte activation and origin of immature oocytes (small and medium size follicles).

Keywords

References

  1. Bavister BD, Leibfried ML and Lieberman G. 1983. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol. Reprod. 28:235-247. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod28.1.235
  2. Dobrinsky JF, Johnson LA and Rath D. 1996. Development of a culture medium (BECM-3) for porcine embryos: effects of bovine serum albumin and fetal bovine serum on embryo development. Biol. Reprod. 55: 1069-1074. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.5.1069
  3. Fukui Y, McGowan LT, James RW, Pugh PA and Tervit HR. 1991. Factors affecting the in-vitro development to blastocysts of bovine oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 92:125-131. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0920125
  4. Hashem A, Hossein MS, Woo JY, Kim S, Kim JH, Lee SH, Koo OJ, Park SM, Lee EG, Kang SK and Lee BC. 2006. Effect of potassium simplex optimization medium and NCSU23 supplemented with beta-mercaptoethanol and amino acids of in vitro fertilized porcine embryos. J. Reprod. Dev. 52:591-599. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.18010
  5. Ikeda K and Takahashi Y. 2001. Effects of maturational age of porcine oocytes on the induction of activation and development in vitro following somatic cell nuclear transfer. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1003-1008. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.63.1003
  6. Im GS, Lai L, Liu Z, Hao Y, Wax D, Bonk A and Prather RS. 2004. In vitro development of preimplantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres. Theriogenology 61:1125-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.06.006
  7. Kim J, You J, Hyun SH, Lee G, Lim J and Lee E. 2010. Developmental competence of morphologically poor oocytes in relation to follicular size and oocyte diameter in the pig. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77:330-339.
  8. Isom SC, Li RF, Whitworth KM and Prather RS. 2012. Timing of first embryonic cleavage is a positive indicator of the in vitro developmental potential of porcine embryos derived from in vitro fertilization, somatic cell nuclear transfer and parthenogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 79:197-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22013
  9. Park Y, Hong J, Yong H, Lim J and Lee E. 2005. Effect of exogenous carbohydrates in a serum-free culture medium on the development of in vitro matured and fertilized porcine embryos. Zygote 13:269-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199405003369
  10. Petters RM and Wells KD. 1993. Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1, 48:61-73.
  11. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A and Campbell KH. 2000. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407:86-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082
  12. Song K, Hyun SH, Shin T and Lee E. 2009. Post-activation treatment with demecolcine improves development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs by modifying the remodeling of donor nuclei. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76:611-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20989
  13. Staunstrup NH, Madsen J, Primo MN, Li J, Liu Y, Kragh PM, Li R, Schmidt M, Purup S, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Svensson L, Petersen TK, Callesen H, Bolund L and Mikkelsen JG. 2012. Development of transgenic cloned pig models of skin inflammation by DNA transposon-directed ectopic expression of human b1 and a2 integrin. PLoS One 7:e36658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036658
  14. Tervit HR, Whittingham DG and Rowson LEA. 1972. Successful culture of in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30:493-497. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0300493
  15. Viet Linh N, Dang-Nguyen TQ, Nguyen BX, Manabe N and Nagai T. 2009. Effects of cysteine during in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes under low oxygen tension on their subsequent in vitro fertilization and development. J. Reprod. Dev. 55:594-598. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.09-075H
  16. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ and Campbell KH. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813. https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
  17. Wu D, Cheung QC, Wen L and Li J. 2006. A growth-maturation system that enhances the meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes isolated from small follicles. Biol. Reprod. 75:547-554. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.051300
  18. Wu GQ, Jia BY, Li JJ, Fu XW, Zhou GB, Hou YP and Zhu SE. 2011. L-carnitine enhances oocyte maturation and development of parthenogenetic embryos in pigs. Theriogenology 76:785-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.04.011
  19. Yamanaka K, Sugimura S, Wakai T, Kawahara M and Sato E. 2009. Difference in sensitivity to culture condition between in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs. J. Reprod. Dev. 55:299-304. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.20174
  20. Yoon KW, Shin TY, Park JI, Roh S, Lim JM, Lee BC, Hwang WS and Lee ES. 2000. Development of porcine oocytes from preovulatory follicles of different sizes after maturation in media supplemented with follicular fluids. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 12:133-139. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD00027
  21. You J, Kim J, Lim J and Lee E. 2010. Anthocyanin stimulates in vitro development of cloned pig embryos by increasing the intracellular glutathione level and inhibiting reactive oxygen species. Theriogenology 74:777-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.002
  22. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM and Iwamura S. 2002. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66: 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112