Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Applying Conventional and Saturated Generalized Gamma Distributions in Parametric Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer

  • Yavari, Parvin (Department of Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Abadi, Alireza (Department of Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Amanpour, Farzaneh (Department of Biostatistics, Paramedical sciences faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Bajdik, Chris (Cancer Control Research Program, BC Cancer Agency)
  • Published : 2012.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The generalized gamma distribution statistics constitute an extensive family that contains nearly all of the most commonly used distributions including the exponential, Weibull and log normal. A saturated version of the model allows covariates having effects through all the parameters of survival time distribution. Accelerated failure-time models assume that only one parameter of the distribution depends on the covariates. Methods: We fitted both the conventional GG model and the saturated form for each of its members including the Weibull and lognormal distribution; and compared them using likelihood ratios. To compare the selected parameter distribution with log logistic distribution which is a famous distribution in survival analysis that is not included in generalized gamma family, we used the Akaike information criterion (AIC; r=l(b)-2p). All models were fitted using data for 369 women age 50 years or more, diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer in BC during 1990-1999 and followed to 2010. Results: In both conventional and saturated parametric models, the lognormal was the best candidate among the GG family members; also, the lognormal fitted better than log-logistic distribution. By the conventional GG model, the variables "surgery", "radiotherapy", "hormone therapy", "erposneg" and interaction between "hormone therapy" and "erposneg" are significant. In the AFT model, we estimated the relative time for these variables. By the saturated GG model, similar significant variables are selected. Estimating the relative times in different percentiles of extended model illustrate the pattern in which the relative survival time change during the time. Conclusions: The advantage of using the generalized gamma distribution is that it facilitates estimating a model with improved fit over the standard Weibull or lognormal distributions. Alternatively, the generalized F family of distributions might be considered, of which the generalized gamma distribution is a member and also includes the commonly used log-logistic distribution.

Keywords

References

  1. Boag JW (1949). Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc B, 11, 15-44.
  2. Chapman JA, Lickley HL, Trudeau ME, et al (2006). Ascertaining prognosis for breast cancer in node-negative patients with innovative survival analysis. Breast J, 12, 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00183.x
  3. Cox C (2008). The generalized F distribution: An umbrella for parametric survival analysis. Stat Med, 27, 4301-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3292
  4. Cox C, Chu H, Schneider MF, Munoz A (2007). parametric survival analysis and taxonomy of hazard functions for the generalized gamma distribution. Stat Med, 26, 4352-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2836
  5. Gamel JW, Vogel RL, Valagussa P, et al (1994). Parametric survival analysis of adjuvant therapy for stage II breast cancer. Cancer, 74, 2483-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9<2483::AID-CNCR2820740915>3.0.CO;2-3
  6. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (1989). Applied Survival Analysis. New York, Wiley.
  7. Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, Wiley.
  8. Kleinbaum D, Klein M (2005). Survival Analysis. New York, Springer.
  9. Lee E, Wang J (2003). Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. New Jersey, Wiley.
  10. Ouwens M, Philips Z, Jansen J (2011). Network meta-analysis of parametric survival curves. wileyonlinelibrary.
  11. Royston P (2001). The lognormal distribution as a model for survival time in cancer, with an emphasis on prognostic factors. Statistica Neerlandica, 55, 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9574.00158
  12. Wang S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Kim J, Fuller D, Thomas C (2010). Parametric survival models for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancer. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 13, 847-51.