대한교통학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Transportation)

  • 제30권4호
  • /
  • Pages.33-42
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1229-1366(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-4217(eISSN)
대한교통학회 (Korean Society of Transportation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산업연관표를 이용한 교통과 통신산업의 상호연관성 분석

Analysing Relationships between Transportation and Communications Industries Based on Input-Output Table

  • 장유경 (홍익대학교 대학원 도시계획과) ;
  • 추상호 (홍익대학교 도시공학과)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.04
  • 심사 : 2012.08.02
  • 발행 : 2012.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 정보통신기술의 발전에 의한 교통서비스의 질적 향상에 따른 교통과 통신의 상호관계를 규명하는 연구들에서는 주로 통행이라는 양적 교통서비스 측면에 집중하였으나, 실질적으로는 교통 및 통신부문의 전체 산출물 중 절반 이상이 타산업의 중간재로 이용되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 1980년부터 2005년까지의 6개 실측년도 산업연관표를 이용하여 우리나라의 교통 및 통신산업의 상호연관성을 교통과 통신산업 관련항목들을 제조산업 및 서비스산업으로 분류하여 두 산업의 상호관계를 분석하였다. 교통과 통신산업은 전반적으로 선진국과 유사하게 상호보완관계를 지니고 있으나, 교통과 통신산업의 세부항목들의 상관관계에서는 일부항목들이 점차 대체관계로 전환되는 경향이 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

Recent development and penetrating expansion in ICT(Information and Communication Technology) has brought considerable improvements in transportation services. However, there is a controversial debate whether transportation and communications behave as substitutes or as complements to one another. On this subject, recent studies considered those two industries as services, but transportation and communications are broadly put for intermediary goods into other industries. Hence, it is essential to examine this issue from understanding their relationships to each other with respect to manufacturing and services. In this study, input-output tables of benchmark years from 1980 to 2005 have been analysed to explore the relationships between transportation and communications using Spearman's correlation analysis. The results show that both industries had complementary roles over the period, but, to some extent, changed into substitution roles in some categories.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chen P. Y. and P. M. Popovich(2002), Correlation: Parametric and Non-parametric Measures, a SAGE University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Science 139, SAGE Publications, pp.31-33.
  2. Choo S. H. and P. L. Mokhtarian(2005), Exploring Relationships between Transportation and Communications Using Consumer Expenditure Patterns, Journal of the Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.23, No.8, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.67-75.
  3. Kim D. W.(2007), Economic Impacts of Information and Communications Technology Industry in Korea Using Input-Output Tables, Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.32, No.3, the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, pp.81-96.
  4. Kim H. B.(1995), Urban and Regional Economics: Analysis and Forecasting, Kimoondang, pp.43-167.
  5. Lee T. and P. L. Mokhtarian(2008), Correlations between Industrial Demands (Direct and Total) for Communications and Transportation in the U.S. Economy 1947-1997, Transportation, Vol.35, No.1, Springer, pp.1-22.
  6. Lim M. H. and Jeong H. S.(1990), An Analysis on the Impacts of Information and Communication Industry Using Input-Output Analysis, Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, Vol.5, No.2, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, pp.14-38.
  7. Mokhtarian P. L.(2009), If Telecommunication Is Such a Good Substitute for Travel, Why Does Congestion Continue To Get Worse?, Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research, Vol.1, No.1, J. Ross Publishing, Inc., pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2009.01.01.1-17
  8. Plaut P. O.(1999), Do Telecommunications Reduce Industrial Uses of Transportation?: An International Comparison of Israel, Canada, U.S.A. and Europe, World Transportation Policy and Practice, Vol.5, No.4, Eco-Logica Ltd., pp.42-50.
  9. Quah D.(2002), Technology Dissemination and Economic Growth: Some Lessons for the New Economy, CEP Discussion Paper, No.522, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, pp.1-63.
  10. Selvanathan E. A. and S. Selvanathan (1994), The Demand for Transport and Communication in the United Kingdom and Australia, Transportation Research B: Methodological, Vol.28, No.1, Elsevier, pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)90027-2
  11. The Bank of Korea(2007), Input-Output Analysis, pp.20-89.
  12. United Nations(2011), 2010 United Nations Statistical Yearbook, pp.118-129.
  13. Vu K. M.(2011), ICT as a Source of Economic Growth in the Information Age: Empirical Evidence from the 1996-2005 Period, Telecommunications Policy, Vol.35, No.4, Elsevier, pp.357-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.008
  14. Yoon J. H.(2008), An Input-Output Analysis on the Korean Railway Industry with the 2003 Input-Output Tables, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol.11, No.4, the Korean Society for Railway, pp.410-416.