Journal of Gastric Cancer

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.63-72
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2093-582X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-5641(eISSN)
대한위암학회 (The Korean Gastric Cancer Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robotic Gastrectomy: The Current State of the Art

  • Marano, Alessandra (Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin) ;
  • Hyung, Woo-Jin (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2012.06.08
  • 심사 : 2012.06.12
  • 발행 : 2012.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Since the first laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer was reported in 1994, minimally invasive surgery is enjoying its wide acceptance. Numerous procedures of this approach have developed, and many patients have benefited from its effectiveness, which has been recently demonstrated for early gastric cancer. However, since laparoscopic surgery is not exempt from some limitations, the robotic surgery system was introduced as a solution by the late 1990's. Many experienced surgeons have embraced this new emerging method that provides undoubted technical and minimally invasive advantages. To date, several studies have concentrated to this new system, and have compared it with open and laparoscopic approach. Most of them have reported satisfactory results concerning the post-operative short-term outcomes, but almost all believe that the role of robotic gastrectomy is still out of focus, especially because long-term outcomes that can prove robotic oncologic equivalency are lacking, and operative costs and time are higher in comparison to the open and laparoscopic ones. This article is a review about the current status of robotic surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer, especially, focusing on the technical aspects, comparisons to other approaches and future prospects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N; Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:68-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225364.03133.f8
  2. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2
  3. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010;251:417-420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b
  4. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777-784. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777
  5. Hyung WJ. Robotic surgery in gastrointestinal surgery. Korean J Gastroenterol 2007;50:256-259.
  6. Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH. Current status of robotassisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2011;3:137-143. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137
  7. Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2011;57:33-42.
  8. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1429-1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00158-0
  9. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 2009;249:927-932. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73
  10. Hyung WJ, Woo YH, Noh SH. Robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a technical review. J Robot Surg 2011;5:241-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0263-x
  11. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5
  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
  13. D'Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Mazzocchi P, Lucandri G, et al. Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 2011;166:e113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.881
  14. Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1204-1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4
  15. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Di Zitti L, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2753-2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0129-0
  16. Anderson C, Ellenhorn J, Hellan M, Pigazzi A. Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1662-1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9266-0
  17. Isogaki J, Haruta S, Man-I M, Suda K, Kawamura Y, Yoshimura F, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer: experience at our institute. Pathobiology 2011;78:328-333. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330172
  18. Hyung WJ, Song C, Cheong JH, Choi SH, Noh SH. Percutaneous needle decompression during laparoscopic gastric surgery: a simple alternative to nasogastric decompression. Yonsei Med J 2005;46:648-651. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.648
  19. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Obama K, Son T, Noh SH. Minimizing hepatic trauma with a novel liver retraction method: a simple liver suspension using gauze suture. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3939-3945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1788-9
  20. Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Yoshimura F, Hiramatsu Y, Haruta S, Kawamura Y, et al. A protective technique for retraction of the liver during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: using a Penrose drain. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1301-0
  21. Shabbir A, Lee JH, Lee MS, Park do J, Kim HH. Combined suture retraction of the falciform ligament and the left lobe of the liver during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:3237-3240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1118-7
  22. Hyung WJ, Lim JS, Cheong JH, Kim J, Choi SH, Song SY, et al. Intraoperative tumor localization using laparoscopic ultrasonography in laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8196-3
  23. Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Lee CR, Lim JS, An JY, Cheong JH, et al. Intraoperative portable abdominal radiograph for tumor localization: a simple and accurate method for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2011;25:958-963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1288-3
  24. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Ferrari GC, Forgione A, Costanzi A, et al. Outcomes and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Analysis on 65 patients operated on by conventional or robot-assisted minimal access procedures. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.001
  25. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Costanzi A, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, et al. Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2594-2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1014-1
  26. Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc 2010;24:610-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0618-9
  27. Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han SU. Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010;20:693-697. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0246
  28. Uyama I, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Inaba K, Suda K, Satoh S. Novel integrated robotic approach for suprapancreatic D2 nodal dissection for treating gastric cancer: technique and initial experience. World J Surg 2012;36:331-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1352-8
  29. Liu FL, Lv CT, Qin J, Shen KT, Chen WD, Shen ZB, et al. Da Vinci robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a case series of 9 patients. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010;13:327-329.
  30. Lee HH, Hur H, Jung H, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Robotassisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: initial experience. Am J Surg 2011;201:841-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.013
  31. Yu PW, Tang B, Zeng DZ, Zhao YL, Shi Y, Hao YX, et al. Robotic-assisted radical gastrectomy using da Vinci robotic system: a report of 41 cases. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012;15:121-124.
  32. Caruso S, Patriti A, Marrelli D, Ceccarelli G, Ceribelli C, Roviello F, et al. Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Int J Med Robot 2011;7:452-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.416
  33. Glantzounis G, Ziogas D, Baltogiannis G. Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastrectomy for cancer: need for comparative-effectiveness quality. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1510-1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0790-y
  34. Pernazza G, Gentile E, Felicioni L, Tumbiolo S, Giulianotti PC. Improved early survival after robotic gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:286.
  35. Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.09.006
  36. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, et al. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 2011;146:1086-1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.114
  37. Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Park JY, et al. Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1377-1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2043-0
  38. Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, et al. Initial experience of robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
  39. Jayaraman S, Quan D, Al-Ghamdi I, El-Deen F, Schlachta CM. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures? Surg Endosc 2010;24:584-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0621-1
  40. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:171-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346

피인용 문헌

  1. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma vol.100, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9242
  2. Roboterunterstützte hepatobiliäre Chirurgie und Magenchirurgie vol.84, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2581-1
  3. Robot-assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Current Status and Technical Considerations vol.37, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2100-z
  4. Emerging Role of Robot-assisted Gastrectomy: Analysis of Consecutive 200 Cases vol.13, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.4.255
  5. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure vol.28, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0
  6. Concurrent Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Partial Nephrectomy for Synchronous Early Gastric Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Initial Experience vol.14, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2014.14.2.211
  7. Assessing the feasibility of full robotic interaortocaval nodal dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer vol.11, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1588
  8. Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.46, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1190-7
  9. Robotic D2 Lymph Node Dissection During Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Toward Procedural Standardization vol.23, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5166-7
  10. Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection vol.22, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2875
  11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.9, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i1.1
  12. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer vol.33, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x
  13. Oncological Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy: Technical Aspects and Ongoing Data vol.30, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0345
  14. Minimally invasive gastrectomy for cancer and anastomotic options vol.122, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25904
  15. Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes vol.73, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-00973-0
  16. Comparison of microscopic illumination between a three-dimensional heads-up system and eyepiece in cataract surgery vol.31, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120929962