DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

태양광 수직통합화가 사업가치에 미치는 영향: 효율성 및 유연성

Vertical Integration of Solar business and its Value Analysis: Efficiency or Flexibility

  • Kim, Kyung-Nam (Green School (Graduate School of Energy and Environment), Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Woo-Chan (College of Business Administration, Hongik University) ;
  • SonU, Suk-Ho (College of Business Administration, Hongik University)
  • 투고 : 2012.06.08
  • 심사 : 2012.06.22
  • 발행 : 2012.06.25

초록

Why solar companies preferred vertical integration of whole value chain? Major solar companies have built internally strong vertical integration of entire PV value chain. We raise a question whether such integration increases the corporate value and whether market situation affects the result. To test these questions, we conducted multi-variant analysis where characteristic factors mainly affect the corporate value measured in terms of Tobin'Q, based on the financial and non-financial data of PV companies listed in US stock market between 2005 and 2010. We hypothesize that since integration increases the overall efficiency but decreases the flexibility to adjust to various market situation, the combined effect of the efficiency gain and the flexibility loss ultimately determines the sign of integration effect on the corporate vale. We infer that the combined effect will be influenced heavily by business cycle, as in boom market (Seller's market) the efficiency gain may be larger than the flexibility loss and vice versa in bust market. We test whether the sign of combined effect changes after the year of 2009 and which factors influence most the sign. Year of 2009 is known as the year when market shifted from Seller's to Buyer's market. We show that 1) integration increases corporate value in general but after 2009 integration significantly decreases the value, 2) the ratios such as Production/Total Cost, Cash turnover period chosen for reversal of the flexibility measure are negatively affect Tobin's Q and especially stronger after 2009. This shows the flexibility improves corporate value and stronger in the recess period (Buyer's market). These results imply that solar company should set up integration strategy considering the tradeoff between efficiency and flexibility and the impact of the business cycle on both factors. Strategy only based on the price competitiveness determined in boom time can bring undesirable outcomes to the company. In addition, Strategic alliances in some value chains as a flexible bondage should be taken in account as complementary choice to the rigid integration.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김경남, 선우석호, 2011, "Real Options Embedded in a Solar Power Project: A Case Analysis of AJU Energy", KBR, 제15권 제2호 pp. 101-130.
  2. 김경남, 선우석호, 2011, "태양광모듈 생산 증설투자에 대한 의사결정: 실물옵션모형에 의한 경영유연성 가치 분석", 신재생에너지, 제7권 제2호 pp. 18-27.
  3. 선우석호, 2008, "M&A 기업합병.매수와 구조개편", 제4판, 율곡출판사.
  4. 여경철, 2005, "한국기업의 수직적 통합 전략과 사업성과", 국제지역연구, 제9권 제3호. pp. 208-228.
  5. 홍재범, 장세진, 1999, "수직적통합이 계열기업의 원가구조와 수익성에 미치는 영향", 한국전략경영학회 춘계학술대회 및 특별세미나, pp. 47-65.
  6. Coase RH., 1937, "The nature of the firm", Econometrica 4. pp. 386-405.
  7. Chung, K. H and C. Charoenwong, 1991, "Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks.", Financial Management, Autumn, pp. 21-33.
  8. D'Aveni, R.A. and D.J.Ravenscraft, 1994, "Economies of Integration versus Bureaucracy Costs: Does Vertical Integration Improve Performance?", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 1167-1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/256670
  9. Davis, Jane and N.Joglekar, 2010, "The Market Value of Modularity and Supply Chain integration: Theory and Evidence from the Solar Photovoltaic Industry", Boston University School of Management, Research Paper Series No. 2010-27, pp. 1-32.
  10. Leiblein, M., 2003, "The Choice of Organizational Governance Form and Performance: Predictions from Transaction Cost, Resources-based, and Real Options Theories", Journal of Management, 29(6), pp. 937-961
  11. Leiblein, M. and D.Miller, 2003, "An Empirical examination of transaction and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm", Strategic Management Journal, 24. pp. 839-859. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.340
  12. Myers, S.C. 1977, "Determinants of corporate borrowing." Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 147-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
  13. Williamson OE., 1975, "Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications", Free Press, New York.