Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Instruction Effectiveness of Ability Grouping based on 'Setting'

'세팅(setting)'에 의한 능력별 집단편성 수업의 효과 분석

  • Received : 2012.04.27
  • Accepted : 2012.05.28
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research aims to analyze on the instruction effectiveness of ability grouping based on 'setting' and the result is as following. Superior group had a positive effect from the aspect of self-conception, satisfaction on class, and learning attitude while average and inferior group had a negative effect from the aspect of self-conception, satisfaction on class, and learning attitude. Therefore, the point seems to be that ability-grouping class based on 'setting' only helps the students in the superior group. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the educational policy of variable curriculum classroom by achievement Level implemented by current ability-grouping. A method should be prepared to help all the students in superior, average, and inferior level.

Keywords

References

  1. 간진숙․금미숙․이칭찬(2012). 수분별 유아수업 설계모형이 유아교사의 전문성 발달에 미치는 효과, 수산해양교육연구 24(1), 56-78.
  2. 김달효(2006). 능력별 집단편성의 비판적 이해, 서울: 시그마프레스.
  3. 김달효(2007). 능력별 집단편성에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식, 수산해양교육연구 19(3), 390-402.
  4. 김달효(2008). 학생의 능력별 집단편성에 따른 관련 변인의 차이 분석, 중등교육연구 56(2), 1-22.
  5. 김영철 등(1995). 고등학교 평준화 정책의 개선방안, 한국교육개발원.
  6. 김태균(2007). 수준별 이동 수업이 학생들의 수학적 성향과 수학성취도에 미치는 효과, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문.
  7. 김홍원 등(2004). 수준별 이동수업 내실화 방안연구, 한국교육개발원 연구보고서.
  8. 박소영(2001). 중학교 수준별 수업 운영 실태에 관한 교사 인식 조사, 교육과정연구 19(2), 한국교육과정학회, 95-117.
  9. 박소영(2004). 수준별 교육과정의 운영 실태와 개선 방안 연구, 수산해양교육연구 16(1), 21-34.
  10. 박현애(2008). 수준별 이동수업에 관한 학생과 교사들의 인식에 대한 연구, 목포대학교 석사학위논문.
  11. 배정애(2001). 중학교 수준별 교육에 대한 교사․학생의 인식 비교․분석, 경성대학교 석사학위논문.
  12. 성기선.강태중(2001). 평준화 정책과 지적 수월성 교육의 관계에 대한 실증적 검토, KEDI 교육정책포럼-한국교육의 현실과 대안(2), 한국교육개발원.
  13. 원영심(2008). 집단의 크기를 달리한 수준별 이동수업 효과 분석, 건국대학교 석사학위논문.
  14. 원효헌․김명생(2009). 중학교 수학과 특별보충과정이 학생의 정의적 특성에 미치는 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 21(1), 151-161.
  15. 정미경(2000). 수준별 수업과 교육기회의 평등화문제, 교육과정연구 18(1), 275-297.
  16. 중앙교육진흥연구소(2001). 일반계 고등학교의 학교별 교육효과 분석, 중앙교육진흥연구소.
  17. 황희숙․김주안(2000). 협동기술을 적용한 구성주의적 수업의 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 12(2), 102-121.
  18. Boaler, J., William, D., & Brown, M.(2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure, British Educational Research Journal 26(5), 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651583
  19. Clammer, R.(1985). Mixed ability teaching: meanings and motives, A study of two geography departments, SERCH, 7, 17-19.
  20. Cole, M., & Griffin, P.(1987). Contextual factors in education: improving science and mathematics education for minorities and women, Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
  21. Dawson, M. M.(1987). Beyond ability grouping: a review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives, School Psychology Review 16(3), 348-369.
  22. Eder, D.(1981). Ability grouping as a selffulfilling prophecy : a micro-analysis of teacherstudent interaction, Sociology of Education, 54, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112327
  23. Ekstrom, R. B., & Villegas, A. M.(1991). Ability grouping in middle grade mathematics: processes and consequences, Research in Middle Level Education 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10825541.1991.11669982
  24. Esposito, D.(1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments, Review of Education Research 43(2), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543043002163
  25. Finley, M. K.(1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school, Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112427
  26. Gamoran, A., & Berends, M.(1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: synthesis of survey and ethnographic research, Review of Educational Research 57, 415-435. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004415
  27. Gene, S.(1995). NASSP Bulletin, Feb. 79, 18-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659507956804
  28. George, P. S.(1993). Tracking and ability grouping in the middle school: ten tentative truths, Middle School Journal 24, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495369
  29. Goldberg, M. L., Passow, A. H., & Justman, J.(1966). The effects of ability grouping, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
  30. Good, T. L.(1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: a decade of research, Educational Leadership 38, 415-427.
  31. Good, T. L., & Marshall, S.(1984). Do students learn more in heterogeneous group? In. S. W. Raudenbush, & J. D. Williams.(eds). The social context of instruction : group organization and group processes, New York: Academic Press.
  32. Hallinan, M. T., & Sorensen, A.(1985). Ability grouping and student friendship, American Educational Research 22(4), 485-499.
  33. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S.(2001). Ability grouping in education, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  34. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1984). Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: a meta-analysis, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August, 24-28.
  35. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programmes : a metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research 60, 265-299. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060002265
  36. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C.(1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs, Gifted Child Quarterly 36(2), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600204
  37. Loveless, T.(1999). The tracking wars, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  38. Oakes, J.(1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality, New York: Yale University Press.
  39. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.(1992). Curriculum differentiation: opportunities, consequences and meaning, In P. Jackson, (ed). Handbook of research on curriculum, New York: Macmillan.
  40. Page, R.(1992). Lower track classrooms: a curricular and cultural perspective, New York: Teachers College Press.
  41. Slavin, R. E.(1989). Class size and student achievement : small effects of small classes, Educational Psychologist 24(1), 99-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2401_4
  42. Slavin, R. E.(1990). Ability grouping and student achievement in secondary schools: a best evidence synthesis, Review of Educational Research 60, 471-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471
  43. Slavin, R. E., & Braddock, J. H. III.(1993). Ability grouping: on the wrong track, The College Board Review 168, 11-18.
  44. Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E.(1995). Heterogeneous grouping as an element of cooperative learning in an elementary education science course, School Science & Mathematics 95(8), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb10192.x
  45. Wheelock, A.(1994). Alternatives to tracking and ability grouping, American Association of School Administrators, Arlington. VA.
  46. Yair, G.(1997). Teachers' polarization in heterogeneous classrooms and the social distribution of achievement: an Israeli case study, Teaching and Teacher Education 13(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00025-X