DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Age, extraction rate and jaw surgery rate in Korean orthodontic clinics and small dental hospitals

  • Jung, Min-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.06.22
  • Accepted : 2011.09.14
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the current data regarding age, sex, and Angle Classification of Korean orthodontic patients and influence of these factors on the tendency to undergo extraction and orthognathic surgery. Methods: The recent trends of Korean orthodontic patients were assessed using questionnaire survey. The questionnaires were e-mailed to orthodontists who met the study criteria; 58% of the orthodontists opened the e-mails, and 27.7% replied to the e-mails. In all, the medical records of 11,340 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment at private clinics and small dental hospitals in Korea were analyzed. Results: The percentage of female patients in the study sample was 69.6%, and the average age of the patients was 19.87 years. The percentage of patients who were older than 19 years was 50.2%. Class II and Class III malocclusions were noted in 33.6% and 23.6% of patients, respectively. Extraction and orthognathic surgery were performed in 60.4% and 6.9% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The results showed that there were a high percentage of adult, Class II malocclusion and extraction patients in private practices and small dental hospitals during the study period. Further, a relatively high proportion of adult patients opted to undergo orthognathic surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean Statistical Information Service. Statistical abstract of Korea: 1995, 2000, 2005. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office; 1995, 2000, 2005.
  2. Baik HS, Kim KH, Park Y. The distributions and trends in maocclusion patients - A 10 year study of 2155 patients from YDSH. Korean J Orthod 1995; 25:87-100.
  3. Im DH, Kim TW, Nahm DS, Chang YI. Current trends in orthodontic patients in Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Korean J Orthod 2003;33:63-72.
  4. Lew KK, Foong WC, Loh E. Malocclusion prevalence in an ethnic Chinese population. Aust Dent J 1993;38:442-9.
  5. Onyeaso CO. Prevalence of malocclusion among adole scents in Ibadan, Nigeria. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:604-7.
  6. O'Connor BM. Contemporary trends in orthodontic practice: a national survey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:163-70.
  7. Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:462-6.
  8. Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994;64:407-14.
  9. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic treatment planning: Limitations, controversies, and special problems. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. editors. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed, St. Louis: Mosby; 2007. pp. 278-80.
  10. Lee JK. A study on the effects of medical service quality and location on the performance of orthodontic clinic [PhD thesis]. Seoul: Seoul University of Venture and Information; 2008.
  11. Waldman HB, Perlman SP, Schindel R. Update on the imbalanced distribution of orthodontists, 1995-2006. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:704-8.
  12. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42:625-40.
  13. Harrison JE, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3): CD003452.
  14. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstract of the United States: 1992, 1996, 2008. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1992, 1996, 2008.
  15. Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA. Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:706-13.
  16. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13:97-106.
  17. El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusion. Angle Orthod 1990;60:207-14.
  18. Lee SJ, Suhr CH. Recognition of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 7-18 year-old Korean adolescent. Korean J Orthod 1994;24:367-94.
  19. Yoo YK, Kim NI, Lee HK. A study on the prevalence of malocclusion in 2,378 Yonsei university students. Korean J Orthod 1971;2:35-40.
  20. Gok DB, Kyung HM, Kwon OW, Sung JH. The distribution and trend of malocclusion patients visited at Department of orthodontics. Korean J Orthod 1989;19:35-48.
  21. Jung MH. Current trends in orthodontic patients in private orthodontic clinics. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:36-42.
  22. Korean Association of Orthodontics Malocclusion White Paper Publication Committee. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion in Korean adults. Korean Association of Orthodontists: 1997. p. 13.
  23. Lim HJ, Ko KT, Hwang HS. Esthetic impact of premolar extraction and nonextraction treatments on Korean borderline patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:524-31.
  24. Xu TM, Liu Y, Yang MZ, Huang W. Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:672-7.
  25. Sforza C, Laino A, D'Alessio R, Grandi G, Binelli M, Ferrario VF. Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Italian women as compared to normal women. Angle Orthod 2009;79:17-23.
  26. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006;76:204-10.
  27. Liu Y, Korn EL, Oh HS, Pearson H, Xu TM, Baumrind S. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:621-34.
  28. Jung MH, Heo W, Baek SH. Effects of malocclusion on the self-esteem of female university students. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:388-96.
  29. Jung MH. Evaluation of the effects of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment on self-esteem in an adolescent population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:160-6.
  30. Musich DR. Orthodontic aspects of orthognathic surgery. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KWL, editors. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 996.
  31. Musich DR. Orthodontic aspects of orthognathic surgery. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KWL, editors. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 1038.

Cited by

  1. A better statistical method of predicting postsurgery soft tissue response in Class II patients vol.84, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2319/050313-338.1
  2. Testing a better method of predicting postsurgery soft tissue response in Class II patients: A prospective study and validity assessment vol.85, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2319/052514-370.1
  3. Modern trends in Class III orthognathic treatment: A time series analysis vol.87, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/043016-349.1
  4. Asymmetric extractions in a patient with a hopeless maxillary central incisor, followed by treatment with mini-implant anchorage vol.153, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.033
  5. Total arch distalization with interproximal stripping in a patient with severe crowding vol.49, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.3.194
  6. Effects of bicuspid extractions and incisor retraction on upper airway of Asian adults and late adolescents: A systematic review vol.46, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12854
  7. Différences de posture craniocervicale et morphologie faciale chez deux groupes ethniques vol.12, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medleg.2020.12.002