Three-year Follow-up after Autogenous and Xenogenic Jaw Bone Grafts

  • Seo, Mi-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Soung-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Keun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2011.10.06
  • Accepted : 2012.05.04
  • Published : 2012.05.30

Abstract

This case report assessed the three-year follow-up results after autogenous and xenogenic bone grafts of the jaw. Autogenous particulated bone with osteogenesis and osteoinductive properties and xenogenic Bio-Oss$^{(R)}$ (Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) graft materials with osteoconductive propertes were grafted into cystic cavities that remained after multiple cystic enucleation in the right upper posterior maxilla and the left lower posterior mandible. Six months later, increased radiopacity in the grafted area was seen. Three-year follow-up results with clinical and panoramic radiography after autogenous and xenogenic bony mixtures in jaw are reviewed and discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE, editors. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009.
  2. Pradel W, Eckelt U, Lauer G. Bone regeneration after enucleation of mandibular cysts: comparing autogenous grafts from tissue-engineered bone and iliac bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:285-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.001
  3. Ihan Hren N, Miljavec M. Spontaneous bone healing of the large bone defects in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1111-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.008
  4. Lee DK, Min SK, Kwon KH, et al. Effect of decalcified freeze-dried allogeneic bone graft(DFDB) on the jaw defects after cyst enucleation. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;21:360-5.
  5. Schaaf H, Lendeckel S, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P. Donor site morbidity after bone harvesting from the anterior iliac crest. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:52-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.023
  6. Bodner L. Effect of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft on the healing of jaw defects after cyst enucleation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:1282-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90482-6
  7. Marx RE. Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:455-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2007.07.008
  8. de Vicente JC, Hernandez-Vallejo G, Brana-Abascal P, Pena I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:430-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01877.x
  9. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL. Regeneration of periodontal tissue: bone replacement grafts. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:55-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2009.09.003
  10. Thuaksuban N, Nuntanaranont T, Pripatnanont P. A comparison of autogenous bone graft combined with deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone graft alone for treatment of alveolar cleft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:1175-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.008
  11. Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:26-34.
  12. Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:55-66.
  13. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hammerle C. Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:59-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090108.x
  14. Merkx MA, Maltha JC, Stoelinga PJ. Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: a review of clinical reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0346
  15. Pikdoken L, Gurbuzer B, Kucukodaci Z, Urhan M, Baris E, Tezulas E. Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial-results after 4 months of healing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:160-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.036
  16. Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Motta JJ, Crescentini M. Spontaneous bone regeneration after enucleation of large mandibular cysts: a radiographic computed analysis of 27 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:942-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.8732