Discrepancies in Soft Tissue Profile of Patients for Orthognathic Surgery between Preoperative Lateral Facial Photograph, Lateral Cephalogram and Supine Position on Operation Table

  • Jung, Young-Eun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Hoon-Joo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.15
  • 심사 : 2012.05.04
  • 발행 : 2012.05.30

초록

Purpose: An accurate preoperative analysis of the patient is essential in orthognathic surgery in order to acquire superior results. In profile, the location of the chin's position may change according to the neck's inclination. This may ultimately affect the amount of surgical movement. During acquisition of cephalometric radiographs, or in supine position, there is a discrepancy in the neck's inclination. This means that there are also various discrepancies between the actual profile and the various preoperative profile images. In the clinical situation, the decision in performing genioplasty usually lies in the analysis of the patient's profile on the operating table at the final stages of orthognathic surgery. This study aims to analyze the different preoperative profile images and to compare their discrepancies. Methods: Fifty eight patients undergoing orthognathic surgery were chosen. These patients were divided into three groups according to angle's classification of malocclusion, as class I, II or III. The right profile of these patients in centric occlusion was taken in natural head position (NHP). This was set as the 'actual profile image.' Another right profile image was taken on the operating table after insertion of the nasotracheal intubation and with muscle relaxants in effect. This was also taken in centric occlusion. The angle (denoted 'A') between the soft tissue glabella-pognion and the true vertical plane was found in the above-mentioned profile images and in the cephalometric radiographs. The differences of these values were analyzed. Results: There were differences in Angle 'A' in all of the preoperative images. These values were however, not statistically significant. Conclusion: In order to gain an esthetic profile during orthognathic surgery, the NHP is shown to be the most reliable position. Images reproducing such head positions should be used in the treatment planning process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cooke MS, Wei SH. A summary five-factor cephalometric analysis based on natural head posture and the true horizontal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;9:213-23.
  2. Barbera AL, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC. An evaluation of head position and craniofacial reference line variation. Homo 2009;60:1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2008.05.003
  3. Peng L, Cooke MS. Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:82-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70306-9
  4. Dvortsin DP, Ye Q, Pruim GJ, Dijkstra PU, Ren Y. Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis. Angle Orthod 2011;81:889-94. https://doi.org/10.2319/010411-2.1
  5. Lundstrom A, Lundström F, Lebret LM, Moorrees CF. Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:111-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/17.2.111
  6. Cooke MS. Five-year reproducibility of natural head posture: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97:489-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80029-0
  7. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Germano D, Dalloca LL, Miani A Jr. Head posture and cephalometric analyses: an integrated photographic/radiographic technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:257-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70045-1
  8. Bister D, Edler RJ, Tom BD, Prevost AT. Natural head posture-considerations of reproducibility. Eur J Orthod 2002;24: 457-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.5.457
  9. Bass NM. The aesthetic analysis of the face. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:343-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.5.343
  10. Showfety KJ, Vig PS, Matteson S, Phillips C. Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology. Angle Orthod 1987;57:99-112.
  11. Michiels LY, Tourne LP. Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalometric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1990;5:43-52.
  12. Luyk NH, Whitfield PH, Ward-Booth RP, Williams ED. The reproducibility of the natural head position in lateral cephalometric radiographs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;24: 357-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(86)90021-5