DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation of CT Perfusion Images with VEGF Expression in Solitary Brain Metastases

  • Zhang, Jian-Hua (Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Wang, Ming-Sheng (Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University) ;
  • Pan, Hai-Hong (Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Li, Shu-Feng (Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Wang, Zhong-Qiu (Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chen, Wang-Sheng (Department of Radiology, Hainan Provincial Pepole's Hospital)
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: To obtain permeability surface (PS) values using multi-slice helical CT perfusion imaging and to evaluate the spatial distribution correlation between PS values and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in solitary brain metastases. Methods: Imaging was performed on 21 patients, PS values being calculated from the central, border and peripheral parts of tumours. VEGF expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Results: Rim enhancement was found in 16 cases, the border of the tumour featuring PS elevation with high VEGF expression in 13 cases. In the 5 cases with nodular enhancement, the border and the central part had high permeability and VEGF expression was high in all cases, the correlation being significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: VEGF expression in brain metastases positively correlates with PS values from CT perfusion imaging, so that the latter can be used in the surveillance of angiogenic activity in brain metastases.

Keywords

References

  1. Cenic A, Nabavi DG (2000). A CT method to measure hemodynamics in brain tumors, validation and application of cerebral blood flow maps. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 462-70.
  2. Christiana Ruhrberg (2003). Growing and shapping the vascular tree, multi-ple roles for VEGF. Bio Essays, 25, 1052-60.
  3. Dixelius J, Laesson H, Sasaki T, et al (2000). Endostasin induced tyrosinekinase signaling through the Sh adaptor protein regulates endothelial cell apoptosis. Blood, 95, 3403-11.
  4. Dhanabal M, Ramchandran R, Waterman MJ, et al (1999). Endostasin induces endothelial cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 274, 117-21. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.1.117
  5. Eastwood JD, Provenzale JM, Hurwitz LM, et al (2001). Practial injection-rate CT perfusion in a case of stroke. Neuroradiology, 43, 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340000528
  6. Folkman J (1971). Tumor angiogenesis, therapeutic implications. N Eng J Med, 285, 1182-6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197111182852108
  7. Hanahan D, Folkman J (1996). Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorsigenesis. Cell, 86, 353-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80108-7
  8. Hermans R, Meijerink M, Van den Bogaert W, et al (2003). Tumor perfusion rate determined noninvasively by dynamic computed tomography predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 57, 1351-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00764-8
  9. Hoeffner EG, Case I, Jain R (2004). Cetebral perfusion CT, technique and clinical application. Radiology, 23, 632-44.
  10. Jeffrey MR, Nina M, William F, et al (1998). Patterns of brain angiogenesis after vascular endothelial growth factor administration in vitro and in vivo. Neurobiology, 95, 7086-91.
  11. Miles KA, Hayball M, Dixon AK (1991). Colour perfusion imaging, a new application of computed tomography. Lancet, 337, 643-5.
  12. Napoleone F, Hans PG, Jennifer L (2003). The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med, 9, 669-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0603-669
  13. O'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, et al (1997). Endostasin, An endogenous inhibitor of angiogensis and tumor growth. Cell, 88, 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81848-6
  14. Petchell RA (2003). The management of brain metastases. Cancer Treat Rev, 29, 533-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00105-1
  15. Principi M, Italiani M, Guiducci A, et al (2003). Perfusion MRI in the evaluation of the relationship between tumour growth, necrosis and angiogenesis in glioblastotnas and grade 1 meningiomas. Neuroradiolagy, 45, 205.
  16. Purdie TG, Henderson E, Lee TY (2001). Functional CT imaging of angiogenesis in rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumor. Phys Med Biol, 46, 3161-75. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/12/307
  17. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Lee TY, et al (2002). Dynamic, contrastenhanced CT of human brain tumors, quantitative assessment of blood volume, blood flow, and microvascular ermeability, preport of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23, 746-7.
  18. Roberts HC, RobertsTP, Smith WS, et al (2001). Multisection dynamic CTperfusion for acute cerebral ischemia, the "toggling-table" technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22, 1077.
  19. Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwntn BD, et al (2002). Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas, preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 179, 783-9.
  20. Tynninen O, Aronen HJ, Ruhala M, et al (1999). MRI enhancement and microvascular density in gliomas. Correlation with tumor cell proliferation. Invest Radiol, 34, 427-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199906000-00007
  21. Wen W, William LD, Ronald TB (2001). VEGF increases BMEC monolayer permeability by affecting occludin expression and tight junction assembly. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 280, 434-40.
  22. Wintermark M, Thiran JP, Maeder P, Schnyder P, Meuli R (2001). Simuitaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by Perfusion CT and stable xenon CT, A validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22, 905-14.

Cited by

  1. A New Tool to Predict Survival after Radiosurgery Alone for Newly Diagnosed Cerebral Metastases vol.16, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.7.2967
  2. The preliminary radiogenomics association between MR perfusion imaging parameters and genomic biomarkers, and their predictive performance of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma vol.135, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2602-x