Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multivariate Analysis of the Prognosis of 37 Chondrosarcoma Patients

  • Yang, Zheng-Ming (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Tao, Hui-Min (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Ye, Zhao-Ming (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Li, Wei-Xu (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Lin, Nong (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Yang, Di-Sheng (Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University)
  • Published : 2012.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimedto screen for possible factors which affect prognosis of chondrosarcoma. Methods: Thirty seven cases were selected and analyzed statistically. The patients received surgical treatment at our hospital between December 2005 and March 2008. All of them had complete follow-up data. The survival rates were calculated by univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested by Log-rank. ${\chi}^2$ or Fisher exact tests were carried out for the numeration data. The significant indexes after univariate analysis were then analyzed by multivariate analysis using COX regression model. Based on the literature, factors of gender, age, disease course, tumor location, Enneking grades, surgical approaches, distant metastasis and local recurrence were examined. Results: Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in Enneking grades, surgical approaches and distant metastasis related to the patients' 3-year survival rate after surgery (P<0.001). No significant difference was not found in gender, age, disease course, tumor location or local recurrence (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that Enneking grade (P=0.007) and surgical approaches (P=0.010) were independent factors affecting the prognosis of chondrosarcoma, but distant metastasis was not (P=0.942). Conclusion: Enneking grades, surgical approaches and distant metastasis are risk factors for prognosis of chondrosarcoma, among which the former two are independent factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, et al (1998). Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer, 83, 2105-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981115)83:10<2105::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-U
  2. Chow WA (2007). Update on chondrosarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol, 19, 371-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e32812143d9
  3. David E, Guihard P, Brounais B, et al (2011). Direct anti-cancer effect of oncostatin M on chondrosarcoma. Int J Cancer, 128, 1822-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25776
  4. de Camargo OP, Baptista AM, Atanasio MJ, Waisberg DR (2010). Chondrosarcoma of bone: lessons from 46 operated cases in a single institution. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 2969-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1368-7
  5. Donati D, Colangeli S, Colangeli M, Di Bella C, Bertoni F (2010). Surgical treatment of grade I central chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 581-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1056-7
  6. Enneking WF (1988). A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Instr Course Lect, 37, 3-10.
  7. Etchebehere M, de Camargo OP, Croci AT, Oliveira CR, Baptista AM (2005). Relationship between surgical procedure and outcome for patients with grade I chondrosarcomas. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 60, 121-6.
  8. Fiorenza F, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, et al (2002). Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, 93-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.11942
  9. Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD, et al (2008). The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist, 13, 320-9. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0237
  10. Giuffrida AY, Burgueno JE, Koniaris LG, et al (2009). Chondrosarcoma in the United States (1973 to 2003): an analysis of 2890 cases from the SEER database. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, 1063-72. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00416
  11. Guo W, Li D, Tang X, Ji T (2010). Surgical treatment of pelvic chondrosarcoma involving periacetabulum. J Surg Oncol, 101, 160-5.
  12. Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G, et al (1999). Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, 326-38.
  13. Leerapun T, Hugate RR, Inwards CY, Scully SP, Sim FH (2007). Surgical management of conventional grade I chondrosarcoma of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463, 166-72.
  14. Lichtenstein L, Jaffe HL (1943). Chondrosarcoma of bone. Am J Pathol, 19, 553-89.
  15. Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ, et al (2003). From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics, 23, 1245-78. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.235035134
  16. Reith JD, Horodyski MB, Scarborough MT (2003). Grade 2 chondrosarcoma: stage I or stage II tumor? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 415, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo0000093895.12372.c1
  17. Riedel RF, Larrier N, Dodd L, et al (2009). The clinical management of chondrosarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 10, 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-009-0088-2
  18. Rizzo M, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP(2001). Chondrosarcoma of bone: analysis of 108 cases and evaluation for predictors of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 391, 224-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200110000-00025
  19. Rozeman LB, Hogendoorn PC, Bovee JV (2002). Diagnosis and prognosis of chondrosarcoma of bone. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2, 461-72. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2.5.461
  20. Schwab JH, Wenger D, Unni K, Sim FH (2007). Does local recurrence impact survival in low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 462, 175-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180caac2c
  21. Streitburger A, Ahrens H, Balke M, et al (2009). Grade I chondrosarcoma of bone: the Munster experience. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 135, 543-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-008-0486-z
  22. Weber KL, Pring ME, Sim FH (2002). Treatment and outcome of recurrent pelvic chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 397, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200204000-00004

Cited by

  1. Primary tumors of the patella vol.13, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0573-y
  2. Epidemiological Aspects of Osteosarcoma, Giant Cell Tumor and Chondrosarcoma Musculoskeletal Tumors - Experience of the National Rehabilitation Institute, Mexico City vol.16, pp.15, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.15.6451
  3. Association of Metastasis with Clinicopathological Data in Mexican Patients with Osteosarcoma, Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Chondrosarcoma vol.16, pp.17, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.17.7689