DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship among Quality Management Activities, Organizational Learning and Firm Performance: with a Focus on Manufacturing Corporations

품질경영활동, 조직학습, 기업성과의 관계: 제조기업을 중심으로

  • Kim, Yeong-Seob (Department of Medical Non-Commissioned Officer, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Na, Sang-Gyun (Division of Business Administration, Wonkwang University)
  • 김영섭 (원광보건대학교 의무부사관과) ;
  • 나상균 (원광대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2012.02.27
  • Accepted : 2012.06.11
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

This paper deals with an empirical analysis of the structural relationship among the factors such as quality management activities, organizational learning and firm performance of manufacturing corporations. The findings of the analysis are expected to make lots of contribution to manufacturing corporations establishing strategies for quality management activities and organizational learning. From the analysis, following conclusions and suggestions could be drawn: First, an analysis of the relationship between quality management activities and organizational learning showed that most activities of quality management turned out to exercise great influence upon the factors of organizational learning. This means that the activities of quality management will prompt the members of an organization to actively engage in learning activities individually, by team and organizationally, motivating them to spread such activities across the whole organization, leading ultimately to fundamental renovation of the very organization. Second, from an analysis of the relationship between organizational learning and firm performance, that is, financial and non-financial performances of a company, it was found that most factors of organizational learning have tremendous impact upon financial and non-financial performances of the company. Such result implies that decision and management of the things to be performed in the process of organizational performances are essential to determining firm performance because firm performance depend largely on the outcomes of organizational learning.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수욱, 곽영화, 최강화, "기업품질성과와 재무성과의 관계연구", 한국생산관리학회, 16(2)(2005): 153-167
  2. 이상진, 이홍우, 이진춘, "품질경영 실행과정에서 학습촉진 요인의 유효성에 관한 연구", 한국생산관리학회, 16(3)(2005): 31-57.
  3. 이회식, 최용정, 김유라, "ISO 9001 품질경영시스템 (QMS)이 종업원 만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 35(4)(2006): 16-25.
  4. 진규동, 최운수, "학습조직 활동과 조직성과에 관한 연구:제조업과 비제조업을 중심으로", 기업교육연구, 10(1)(2008): 1-26.
  5. 홍상진, "국가이미지와 기업브랜드 이미지가 제품이미지 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구." 대한안전경영과학회지, 13(3)(2011): 169-174.
  6. Adam, E. E., "Alternative quality improvement and organization performance." Journal of Operations Management, 12(1)(1994): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90004-3
  7. Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D. W., "Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin." 103(3)(1998): 411-423.
  8. Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, C., "Dynamic Capability : an Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base." British Journal of Management, 13(1)(2009): 22-46.
  9. Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage." Journal of Management, 17(1)(1991): 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  10. Balzarova, M. A., Castka, P., Bamber, C. J. & Sharp, J. M., "How organizational Culture impacts on the implementation of ISO 14001: 1996 UK multiple case review." Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1) (2007): 89-103.
  11. Brodtrick, O., "Organizational Learning and Innovation: Tools for Revitalizing Public Services." International Review of Administrative Science, 64(1)(1998): 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1177/002085239806400107
  12. Coomber, J. E. & Bierly, P. E., "Measuring technology capability and performance." R&D Management, 36(2)(2006): 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00444.x
  13. Dean, J.D. & Bowen, D.E., "Management theory and total quality: improving development." Academy of Management Journal, 19(3) (1994): 392-418.
  14. Dove, R., "Knowledge management, Response Ability, and the agile Enterprise." Journal of knowledge Management, 3(1)(1990): 18-35.
  15. Grant, R., "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage." California Management Review, 33(1)(1991): 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  16. Huber, G.P., "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the literatures." Organization Science, 2(1)(1991): 99-115.
  17. Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, V. & Volberda, F., "Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators." Management Science, 52(11)(2006): 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
  18. March, J., "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning." Organization Science, 2(1)(1991): 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  19. Meyers, P. W. and Wilemon, D., "Learning in New Technology Development Teams." Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(1)(1989): 79-88.
  20. Miller, D. & Toulouse, J., "Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms." Management Science, 32(3) (1986): 1389-1409. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1389
  21. Schein, E., "Three Culture of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning." Sloan Management Review, 38(1996): 9-20.
  22. Shin, D. & Kalinowski, J. G., "Critical Implementation Issues in Total Quality Management." SAM Advanced Management Journal, 63(1)(1998) :10-14.
  23. Sohal, A. & Michael, M., "Is There a Link between Total Quality Management and Learning Organizations." The TQM Magazine, 7(3) (1990): 41-44.
  24. Zahra, S. A. & Jeffrey, C., "Contextual Influence on the Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis." Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1)(1995): 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
  25. Zollo, M. & Winter, S., "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities." Organization Science, 13(3)(2005): 339-351.