Women's Health Nursing (여성건강간호학회지)

Korean Society of Women Health Nursing (한국여성건강간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Meaning of 'Natural Childbirth' and Experiences of Women Giving Birth using Midwifery - A Feminist Approach

조산원 출산 여성의 '자연출산' 의미와 경험 - 페미니스트 접근

  • Received : 2012.05.15
  • Accepted : 2012.06.15
  • Published : 2012.06.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the meanings of 'Natural childbirth' from experiences of Korean women who gave birth to a baby in the midwifery using a feminist approach. Methods: This paper is a qualitative research study and applies a feminist epistemology and methodology to the experiences of women who gave birth in midwifery. The data were collected by individual in-depth interviews with eleven participants. Results: Two main themes emerged from the feminist content analyses and each main theme had three sub themes. A. transformation of control and knowledge on childbirth and the body 1) refusing coercive medicalization and building a new normality, 2) specific expectations about biological health and maternity rather than a return to nature, 3) the subject of pregnancy and childbirth, B. 'natural childbirth' practice as a new embodied discipline 1) helpers to support mothers, midwives, 2) helping the body to do 'natural childbirth', 3) from isolated labor to cooperative reproduction. Conclusion: These results indicate that women desired to practice being a subject, consultation with professionals, self-discipline and named actors except for women as 'other subjects' in childbirth.

Keywords

References

  1. Albers, L. L., Sedler, K. D., & Greulich, B. (1999). Midwifery care: The "gold standard" for normal childbirth? Birth, 26 , 53-54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00053.x
  2. An, S. Y. (2001). The study on the change of social status of the midwife as birth attendant in Korea. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  3. Anderson, G. C., Moore, E., Hepworth, J., & Bergman, N. (2007). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, 2 , No: CD003519.
  4. Cho, Y. M. (1994). A feminist study on reproductive technology- in case of using IVF & ET. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  5. Cho, Y. M. (2004). Women's reproductive rights in the medicalized childbirth practice. Korean Women's Studies, 20 , 67-97.
  6. Coyle, K. L., Hauck Y., Percival, P., & Kristjanson, L. J. (2001). Ongoing relationships with a personal focus: Mothers' perceptions of birth centre versus hospital care. Midwifery, 17 , 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2001.0258
  7. Essex, H. N., & Pickett, K. E. (2008). Mothers without companionship during childbirth: An analysis within the millennium cohort study. Birth, 35 , 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00253.x
  8. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24 , 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
  9. Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2008). Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database System Review, 8 , 1-109.
  10. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leckenby, D. (2004). How feminists practice social research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & M. L. Yaiser (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Social Research (pp. 209- 225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Hildingsson, I., Ra1destad, I., & Lindgren, H. (2010). Birth preferences that deviate from the norm in Sweden: Planned home birth versus planned cesarean section. Birth, 37, 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00423.x
  12. Jeong, Y. B. (2003). A feminist analysis of 'the culture of childbirth' discourse - A critique of the concept of nature and medicalization. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  13. Kang, M. L., Kim, S. K., Bang, J. M., Ahn, J. E., Youn, Y., Lee, S. H., et al. (2005). The comparison of perception of birth experience to women who had a hospital delivery and those who a maternity hospital delivery. Collective studies of Division of Nursing Science (Ewha Womans University), 39 , 119-141.
  14. Kang, M. J. (1995). A study on the childbirth experience at maternity clinic. Collection of Dissertations on Cheju Halla University, 19 , 7-20.
  15. Kennedy, H. P., & Lowe, N. K. (2001). Science and midwifery: Paradigms and paradox, Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 46, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00101-5
  16. Kim, E. S. (1996). The Korean middle-class women's culture of childbirth. Korean Women's Studies, 12 , 119-153.
  17. Kim, E. S. (2001). The cultural politics on women's body. Seoul: Alternative Culture Press.
  18. Kitzinger, S. (2001). Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: Awake, awake-and action! Birth, 28 , 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00210.x
  19. Lee, K. S. (2003). Experience of the women who succeeded natural birth after cesarean section-based on the deliveries at the midwife's clinic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chungnam National University, Daejeon.
  20. Lee, S. H. (2012). Women's experiences on spontaneous delivery with midwives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  21. MacDorman, M. F., & Singh, G. K. (1998). Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 52 , 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.5.310
  22. Morgan, K. P. (1998). Contested bodies, contested knowledges: The politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  23. National Health Insurance Corporation [NHIC]. (2001). Status of cesarean section 2000 in Korea . Seoul: Author.
  24. National Health Insurance Corporation [NHIC]. (2011). Statistics of major surgery 2011 in Korea. Seoul: Author.
  25. National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board [NHPLEB]. (2011). National health personnel licensing examination board white paper 2011 in Korea . Seoul: Author.
  26. Ratcliff, K. S. (2002). Power and the clinical setting. Women and health: Power, technology, inequality, and conflict in a gendered world (pp. 31-38) . Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  27. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Content Analysis. In Feminist Methods in Social Research (pp. 145-163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Thind, A., Mahoni, A., Banerjee, K., & Hagigi, F. (2008). Where to delivery? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health.
  29. Zuk, M. (2003). Sexual selections what we can and can't learn about sex from animals. Berkeley: University of California Press.