Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Weight Factors for Siting the Electric Facilities utilizing Analytical Hierarchy Process

AHP를 이용한 전력설비 입지선정 항목 중요도 분석

  • Received : 2012.03.02
  • Accepted : 2012.04.23
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the weight factors for siting the electric facilities using Analytic Heirarchy Process technique participating the stakeholders. Siting the electric facilities has been a dispute of long standing because of landscape damage, geological deformation and various environmental problems such as electromagnetic effect to human health. For analyzing the weight factors by AHP technique, the questionnaire process was applied to the fifteen committee members including representatives of resident, academic experts, members of local assembly, officers of local government, journalists, etc. in Gangwondo, Korea. Weight factors for siting the electric facilities by AHP committee members resulted in residential areas 35.06%, cultural assets 16.68%, landscape conservation 13.11%, large-scale ecological corridor 10.17%, connectability of electric transmission line 8.32% respectively. The distance from residential areas was the most important factor preferred by committee members for siting the electric facilities.

Keywords

References

  1. 김현식 외, 2010, 자연휴양림 유형별 적정입지선정 평가모형 개발 및 적용, 한국임학회지, 99(1), 111-124.
  2. 박재현, 2004, 분석적 계층과정을 이용한 관광지입지선정에 관한 탐색적 연구, 호텔관광연구, 6(1), 134-156.
  3. 안승범 외, 2003, 계층분석 방법을 이용한 화물터미널 입지선정에 관한 연구, IE Interface, 16(1), 34-43.
  4. 이희연 외, 1999, 쓰레기 소각장 입지선정에 있어서 퍼지집합과 AHP 이론 활용, 한국GIS학회지, 7(2), 223-236.
  5. 조인성 외, 2007, 전문가 그룹별 AHP 기법을 활용한 폐기물 매립지 입지선정 인자의 가중치분석, 한국폐기물학회지, 24(2), 95-100.
  6. Dey PK, Tabucanon MT, Oguniana SO. 1994, Planning for project control through risk analysis: A Case of Petroleum Pipeline Laying Project. International Journal of Project Management, 12(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90006-X
  7. Solnes, J., 2003, Environmental Quality Indexing of Large Industrial Development Alternatives using AHP, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00004-0
  8. Partovi FY, Burton J, Banerjee A.1990, Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Operations Management, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 10(3), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579010134945
  9. King S. et al, 2008, Incorporating Cumulative Effects into Environmental Assessment of Mariculture, 28 : 572-586.
  10. Solnes J., 2000, An Oil Refinery in the North Atlantic; Environmental Profile, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Journal of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 18(4), 309?402.
  11. Webler T., 1995, Public Participation Impact Assessment, A Social Learning Perspective, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E