DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Characteristic and Management of Odor Emitted from Foodwaste Treatment Facility

음식물류폐기물 처리시설에서의 악취발생 특성 및 관리방안

  • Yoo, Seung-Sung (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Kim, Young-Doo (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Yeon (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Cha, Young-Seop (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Sook (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Jeon, Jae-Sik (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Sunwoo, Young (Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University) ;
  • Eom, Seok-Won (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Chae, Young-Zoo (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment)
  • Received : 2012.02.23
  • Accepted : 2012.04.06
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

This study is understanding characteristics and analyzing contributions of the odor causing compounds of complex-odor & major specified odor materials, and contribution analysis, caused pre-treatment facilities(input and storage) and post-treatment facilities(heating and drying). The target of this study is feeds-production-facilities, located in Seoul. The averaged complex-odor compounds on the boundary line is 21 times higher, and it is 15 times higher than emission standards. In cracking&collection(pre-treatment facilities), the concentration of compounds is 4,881 times, 2,080 times in drying, and 1,442 times in putting&storing facilities. Ammonia occupies the largest portion of the results of monitoring specified odor compounds in input&storage facilities, followed Acetaldehyde > Hydrogen sulfide > Methyl mercaptan. In cracking&collection, Ammonia also occupies most of odor compounds, followed Methyl mercaptan > Acetaldehyde > Dimethyl disulfide > Dimethyl sulfide > Hydrogen sulfide. Acetaldehyde > Methyl mercaptan in drying facilities. On the boundary line, however, the concentration of specified odor compounds stays below emission standards. The result of contribution analysis is that methyl mercaptan has the highest contribution in input & storage, as well as cracking&collection facilities, followed Acetaldehyde > Hydrogen sulfide > Dimethyl sulfide > Dimethyl disulfide. In the drying facilities, the contribution shows Methyl mercaptan > Acetaldehyde > i-Valeraldehyde and Butyraldehyde. Therefore, to decrease odor in foodwaste treatment facilities, proper prevention facilities need to be installed and operated, according to characteristics of individual odor compounds, based on monitored data.

Keywords

References

  1. 백광수, 박정구, 이종국, 서병량, 박종현, 오대식, 2009, 가축분뇨처리시설의 처리공정별 악취발생 특성, 한국대기환경학회 추계학술대회 논문집, 504-505.
  2. 박귀환, 오길영, 이지헌, 정경훈, 정선용, 2005, 하수처리장에서 발생하는 악취물질의 비교, 한국냄새환경 학회지, 4, 196-206.
  3. 김종률, 2007, 악취방지기술 및 악취관리정책방향, 한국냄새환경학회 춘계학술대회 논문집.
  4. 정구회, 김선태, 박민수, 정재호, 2004, 하수처리장에서의 악취 배출 성상 조사, 한국냄새환경학회지, 3, 225-233.
  5. 환경부, 2008, 악취방지법
  6. 전의찬, 사재환, 김선태, 홍지형, 김기현, 2006, 생활악취 배출원의 악취배출 특성 연구, 한국대기환경학회지, 22, 337-351.
  7. 류지영, 2004, 음식물자원화시설의 설치.운영에 대한 일반현황의 평가 및 개선방안, 유기성자원학회지, 12(3), 67-68.
  8. 국립환경과학원, 2005, 국립환경과학원고시 제2005-4호, 악취공정시험방법.
  9. 정의석, 2004, 직간접관능법을 응용한 악취평가 방법 및 해석에 관한 연구, 대전대학교 학위논문.
  10. 김성림, 김주인, 김영태, 2004, 음식물쓰레기 처리설비로부터 발생되는 악취저감방안 연구, 부산시보건환경 연구원보, 41-59.
  11. 환경부, 2005, 주요 화학물질의 최소감지농도
  12. 김선화, 장미옥, 정영림, 김협, 김만구, 2007, 음식물 퇴비화시설에서 발생하는 냄새유발물질 분석과 기여도평가, 한국냄새환경학회지, 6(3), 194-201.
  13. 박주영, 2007, 환경기초시설 악취 저감방안 연구, 전라북도보건환경연구원, 162-190.
  14. 정재은, 송복주, 정승렬, 2003, 음식물쓰레기 처리설비에서 발생되는 악취 성분분석 및 적정처리방안 연구, 부산시보건환경연구원보, 162-190.
  15. Nagata. Y., 2003, Odor intensity and threshold value, Bulletin of Japan, Environmental Sanitation Center, 17-25.

Cited by

  1. Contribution Analysis by Malodor Substances from Complex Odor Emission Sources in Urban Industrial Area vol.36, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5572/kosae.2020.36.3.360