Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review (가족자원경영과 정책)

Korean Family Resource Management Association (한국가족자원경영학회)
권호 표지

A Typology of Family Shared Time of Korean Adults

성인의 가족공유시간 유형과 유형별 특성

  • Kim, Oi-Sook (Dept. of Home Economics, Korea National Open Univ.) ;
  • Han, Young-Sun (Dept. of Home Economics, Graduate School of Korea Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Young (Dept. of Consumer Studies & Resource Management, Seoul National Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Yon-Suk (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea Univ.) ;
  • Cho, Hee-Keum (Dept. of Family Welfare, Daegu Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Mi (Dept. of Senior Welfare, Woosuk Univ.) ;
  • Youn, Yong-Ok (Dept. of Home Economics, Korea National Open Univ.)
  • 김외숙 (한국방송통신대학교 가정학과) ;
  • 한영선 (고려대학교 대학원 가정학과) ;
  • 이기영 (서울대학교 소비자아동학부) ;
  • 이연숙 (고려대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 조희금 (대구대학교 가정복지학과) ;
  • 이승미 (우석대학교 실버복지학과) ;
  • 윤용옥 (한국방송통신대학교 가정학과)
  • Received : 2012.03.31
  • Accepted : 2012.05.24
  • Published : 2012.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Studies on time-use have generally concentrated on the amount of time used by each member of a household in Korea. The quality of family relationships could be associated with the amount and types of interactions between family members. This study examined the time that adults spend with their family members on various activities. The purpose of this study is to explore a typology of family time and investigate the characteristics of each type. The data source was the 2009 Time-Use Survey conducted by the Korean National Statistics Office. The people involved in each activity were surveyed for the first time in the 2009 survey in Korea. The data from this study included 10,902 diaries that were filled on weekdays by married adults from ages 20 to 59 years. Data from rural households were excluded. Time use was divided into three categories: family meals, household work and family leisure time. These activities were analyzed using t-test, chi-square analysis and cluster analysis. Family time was classified into four types based on three categories. The four types were named "leisure sharing", "household work sharing", "overall sharing" and "non-sharing". The most common type was non-sharing. The characteristics of each type depended on gender and paid work time. Based on these results, family and labor policies should be developed to increase the work-life balance. Policies that focus on men over 40 years are especially recommended.

Keywords