DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cost Analysis of Mobility Management Schemes for IP-based Next Generation Mobile Networks

IP기반의 차세대 모바일 네트워크에서 이동성관리 기법의 비용분석

  • 김경태 (성균관대학교 정보통신대학원 컴퓨터공학과) ;
  • 정종필 (성균관대학교 정보통신공학부)
  • Received : 2011.12.27
  • Accepted : 2012.04.24
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Cost-effective mobility management for the roaming mobile users is very important in the seamless services on next-generation wireless network (NGWN). MIPv6 (Mobile IPv6) is one of the mobility management schemes proposed by the IETF (The Internet Engineering Task Force) and various IPv6-based mobility management schemes have been developed. They are directly involved with data transfer from MN (Mobile Node). In this paper, two kinds of schemes in analyzing of mobility management schemes are proposed. The signaling transfer and packet delivery procedures for each mobility management schemes are analyzed, respectively. The signaling cost for mobility management schemes are calculated, and the cost of each protocol are analyzed numerically. In other word, applying the sum of signaling cost and packet delivery cost to each mobility management scheme, their costs are analyzed. Finally, our performance evaluation results that the network-based mobility management scheme shows better performance in terms of overall cost.

차세대 무선 네트워크(Next Generation Wireless Networks, NGWN)상에서의 무결점 전송 서비스는 이동단말(MN, Mobile Node)에게 광범위한 로밍을 효율적으로 제공하는 이동성관리가 매우 중요하게 되었다. MIPv6(Mobility IPv6)는 IETF(The Internet Engineering Task Force)에 의해 제안된 이동성관리 기법들 중 하나이고, IPv6기반에서 이동성관리 기법들은 다양한 형태로 발전되어왔다. 각각의 관리기법들은 이동단말에서의 데이터 이동에 직접적인 관여를 하고 있다. 이 논문에서 두 가지의 이동성관리 평가기법에 대해 제안하고자 한다. 이동성관리를 위한 다양한 프로토콜에서 네트워크상의 핸드오버나 패킷의 전송절차를 수행할 때, 데이터의 전송절차에 대하여 분석하며 또 시그널링의 비용을 계산할 때 처리하는 노드들과 그 노드간의 파라미터들을 이용하여 가장 효율적인 방법으로 분석모델링을 제안한다. 이동성 프로토콜의 시그널링 비용과 그 비용을 구성하는 각각의 파라미터들을 수치적 결과를 통해서 각각의 프로토콜들의 비용을 비교분석한다. 즉, 각각의 이동성관리 기법에 적용하여 시그널링 비용과 패킷전송 비용의 합을 비교한다. 이동성 관리의 다양한 기법들 중 가장 최근에 제안되어지고 있는 네트워크 기반의 이동성 프로토콜이 전체적인 비용측면에서 더 우수한 결과를 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. Johnson, D. B. Perkins, C. E. and Arkko, J., "Mobility support in IPv6", IETF RFC 3775, June 2004
  2. Koodli, G., "Fast handovers for mobile IPv6", IETF RFC 4068, July 2005.
  3. Soliman, H. Castelluccia, C. El-Malki, K. and Bellier, L., "Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management", IETF RFC 4140, August 2005.
  4. Jung, H. Soliman, H. Koh, S. and Takamiya, N., "Fast handover for hierarchical MIPv6", Internet Draft, draft-jung-mipshopfhmipv6-00.txt, April 2006.
  5. Gundavelli, S. Leung, K. Devarapalli, V. Chowdhury, K. and Patil, B., "Proxy Mobile IPv6", IETF RFC 5213, August 2008.
  6. Chuang, M. C. and Lee, J. F., "FH-PMIPv6: A fast handoff scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks", Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks, pp.1297-1300, May 2011.
  7. Makaya, Ch. and Pierre, S., "An analytical framework for performance evaluation of IPv6-based mobility management protocols", IEEE, Transactions on Wireless Communications, pp.972-983, March 2008
  8. Skorepa, M. and Klugl, R., "Enhanced analytical method for IP mobility handover schemes cost evaluation", Telecommunication Systems, pp.1-10, June 2011.
  9. Koodli, R. and Perkins, C. E., "Fast handovers and context transfers in mobile networks", ACM Mobile Computing and Commun. Rev., vol. 31, October 2001.
  10. Castelluccia, C., "HMIPv6: a hierarchical mobile IPv6 proposal", ACM Mobile Computing and Commun. Rev., vol. 4, pp.48-59, January 2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/360449.360474
  11. Jung, H. Y. Kim, E. A. Yi, J. W. and Lee, H. H., "A scheme for supporting fast handover in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks", ETRI Journal, vol. 27, pp.798-801, December 2005. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.05.0205.0009
  12. Guan, J. Zhou, H. Yan, Z. Qin, Y. and Zhang, H., "Implementation and analysis of proxy MIPv6", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 11, pp.477-490, April 2011 https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.842
  13. Xia, F. and Sarikaya, B., "Mobile Node Agnostic Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6", Draftxia-netlmm-fmip-mnagno-02, IETF draft, November 2007.
  14. P'erez-Costa, X. Schmitz, R. Hartenstein, H. and Leibsch, M., "A MIPv6, FMIPv6 and HMIPv6 handover latency study: analytical approach", in Proc. IST Mobile and Wireless Commun. Summit, pp.100-105, June 2002.
  15. P'erez-Costa, X. Torrent-Moreno, M. and Hartenstein, H., "A performance comparison of mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, fast handovers for mobile IPv6 and their combination", ACM Mobile Computing and Commun. Rev., vol. 7, pp.5-19, October 2003. https://doi.org/10.1145/965732.965736
  16. Pack, S. and Choi, Y., "A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks", IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E87-B, pp.462-469, March 2004.
  17. Kong, K. S. Lee, W. J. Han, Y. H. Shin, M. K. and You, H. R., "Mobility Management for All-IP Mobile Networks: Mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy Mobile IPv6", IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol. 15, pp.36-45, April 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2008.4492976
  18. Kong, K. S. Lee, W. J. Han, Y. H. and Shin, M. K., "Handover Latency Analysis of a Network-Based Localized Mobility Management Protocol", IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 5838-5843, May 2008.
  19. Ryu, S. G. Kim, G. Y. Kim, B. G. and Mun, Y. S., "A Scheme to Reduce Packet Loss during PMIPv6 Handover Considering Authentication", IEEE International Conference on Computational Sciences and Its Applications, pp.47-51, July 2008
  20. Lei, J. and Fu, X., "Evaluating the Benefits of Introducing PMIPv6 for Localized Mobility Management", IEEE International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, pp.74-80, August 2008.

Cited by

  1. Design and Performance Analysis of A Novel P2P-SIP Architecture for Network-based Mobility Support in Intelligent Home Networks vol.2, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3745/KTCCS.2013.2.7.293