DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recent Trends in Indications of Fetal Echocardiography and Postnatal Outcomes in Fetuses Diagnosed as Congenital Heart Disease

  • Cha, Seulgi (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Gi Beom (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital) ;
  • Kwon, Bo Sang (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital) ;
  • Bae, Eun Jung (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital) ;
  • Noh, Chung Il (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital) ;
  • Lim, Hong Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Woong Han (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Ryul (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yong Jin (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Jung Yun (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We hypothesized that fetal echocardiography (echoCG) is an accurate diagnostic tool reflecting well postnatal echoCG findings and outcomes. Subjects and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 290 pregnant women, including 313 fetuses, who were examined by fetal echoCG at the Seoul National University Children's Hospital from January 2008 through April 2011. Results: The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 26.2${\pm}$5.2 weeks. The mean age of mothers at diagnosis was 31.7${\pm}$3.8 years. We identified indications for fetal echoCG in 279 cases. The most common indication was abnormal cardiac findings in obstetrical screening sonography (52.0%). Among the 313 echoCG results, 127 (40.6%) were normal, 13 (4.2%) were minor abnormalities, 35 (11.2%) were simple cardiac anomalies, 50 (16.0%) were moderate cardiac anomalies, 60 (19.2%) were complex cardiac anomalies, 16 (5.1%) were arrhythmias, and 12 (3.8%) were twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. The most common congenital heart disease was tetralogy of Fallot (23 fetuses, 15.9%). One hundred forty-eight neonates were examined by echoCG. We analyzed differences between fetal echoCG and postnatal echoCG. In 131 (88.5%) cases, there was no difference; in 15 (10.1%), there were minor differences; and in only 2 (1.4%) cases, there were major differences. Conclusion: There is a recent increase in abnormal cardiac findings of obstetric ultrasonography screenings that indicate fetal echoCG. Fetal echoCG is still a good, accurate diagnostic method for congenital heart disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee JE, Jung KL, Kim SE, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: trends in pregnancy termination rate, and perinatal and 1-year infant mortalities in Korea between 1994 and 2005. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010;36:474-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01222.x
  2. Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Korner H, Dietel M. Spectrum of congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations associated with chromosomal abnormalities: results of a seven year necropsy study. Heart 1999;82:34-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.82.1.34
  3. Schultz AH, Localio AR, Clark BJ, Ravishankar C, Videon N, Kimmel SE. Epidemiologic features of the presentation of critical congenital heart disease: implications for screening. Pediatrics 2008;121:751-7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0421
  4. Zhang Y, Riehle-Colarusso T, Correa A, et al. Observed prevalence of congenital heart defects from a surveillance study in China. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30:989-95. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.989
  5. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01886-7
  6. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998- 2005. J Pediatr 2008;153:807-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.059
  7. Cymbron T, Anjos R, Cabral R, Macedo C, Pereira Duarte C, Mota-Vieira L. Epidemiological characterization of congenital heart disease in Sao Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. Community Genet 2006;9:107-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091488
  8. Acharya G, Sitras V, Maltau JM, et al. Major congenital heart disease in Northern Norway: shortcomings of pre- and postnatal diagnosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1124-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00404.x
  9. Friedman AH, Kleinman CS, Copel JA. Diagnosis of cardiac defects: where we've been, where we are and where we're going. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:280-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.305
  10. Feinstein JA, Benson DW, Dubin AM, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current considerations and expectations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59(1 Suppl):S1-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.022
  11. Franklin O, Burch M, Manning N, Sleeman K, Gould S, Archer N. Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity. Heart 2002;87:67-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.87.1.67
  12. Apitz C, Webb GD, Redington AN. Tetralogy of Fallot. Lancet 2009;374:1462-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60657-7
  13. Martins P, Castela E. Transposition of the great arteries. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008;3:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-3-27
  14. Jone PN, Schowengerdt KO Jr. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009;56:709-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2009.04.002
  15. Turner CG, Tworetzky W, Wilkins-Haug LE, Jennings RW. Cardiac anomalies in the fetus. Clin Perinatol 2009;36:439-49, xi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2009.03.015
  16. Choi EY, Lee CH, Yoon MJ, et al. Impact of fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease on parents. Korean J Pediatr 2006;49:1073-8. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2006.49.10.1073
  17. Berkley EM, Goens MB, Karr S, Rappaport V. Utility of fetal echocardiography in postnatal management of infants with prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:654-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2260
  18. Smythe JF, Copel JA, Kleinman CS. Outcome of prenatally detected cardiac malformations. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:1471-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90903-C
  19. Friedberg MK, Silverman NH. Changing indications for fetal echocardiography in a University Center population. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:781-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.981
  20. Cooper MJ, Enderlein MA, Dyson DC, Roge CL, Tarnoff H. Fetal echocardiography: retrospective review of clinical experience and an evaluation of indications. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86(4 Pt 1):577-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00215-D
  21. Meyer-Wittkopf M, Cooper S, Sholler G. Correlation between fetal cardiac diagnosis by obstetric and pediatric cardiologist sonographers and comparison with postnatal findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:392-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00381.x
  22. Boldt T, Andersson S, Eronen M. Outcome of structural heart disease diagnosed in utero. Scand Cardiovasc J 2002;36:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/140174302753675339
  23. Russo MG, Paladini D, Pacileo G, et al. Changing spectrum and outcome of 705 fetal congenital heart disease cases: 12 years, experience in a third-level center. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2008;9:910-5. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0b013e32830212cf
  24. Berg C, Lachmann R, Kaiser C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of tricuspid atresia: intrauterine course and outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:183-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7499
  25. Gedikbasi A, Oztarhan K, Gul A, Sargin A, Ceylan Y. Diagnosis and prognosis in double-outlet right ventricle. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:427-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083840
  26. Plesinac S, Terzic M, Stimec B, Plecas D. Value of fetal echocardiography in diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a Serbian university hospital. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2007;52:89-92.

Cited by

  1. Echocardiography in children with Down syndrome vol.2, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v2.i4.36
  2. The Effect of Multidisciplinary Approach on the Birth Rate of Fetuses with Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease vol.34, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e170
  3. Discrepancy Between Pre- and Postnatal Diagnoses of Congenital Heart Disease and Impact on Neonatal Clinical Course ― A Retrospective Study at a Japanese Tertiary Institution ― vol.84, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-20-0316
  4. Behavior of fetal longitudinal myocardial fibers assessed by speckle tracking to obtain strain and strain rate values for low-risk pregnancies vol.48, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2019-0342
  5. Early Growth Trajectory of Infants With Simple Congenital Heart Disease and Complex Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study in China vol.45, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2017