DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초보자에서 마네킨에게 직접 후두경과 삽관용 후두마스크기도기를 이용한 기관내삽관의 비교

Comparison of tracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope versus the intubating laryngeal mask airway in novice users - A manikin study -

  • Hwang, Ji-Young (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Daejeon University) ;
  • Cho, Keun-Ja (Department of Emergency Medical Service, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.06.29
  • 심사 : 2012.08.16
  • 발행 : 2012.08.31

초록

Purpose : This research was designed to provide basic data for advanced pre-hospital airway management by comparing the time to ventilation and success rate for tracheal intubation performed with Macintosh laryngoscope and intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway(ILMA) in a manikin. Methods : All participants were novice users among EMT-Paramedic students and were divided into two groups: (1) the group for Macintosh laryngoscope guided tracheal intubation(MLG-TI) (2) the group for ILMA guided tracheal intubation(ILMA-TI). After an introductory lecture and demonstration, each group made an attempt ten tracheal intubation to compare the ventilation time and success rate for tracheal intubation. Results : 1) There was significant difference in the time to ventilation through MLG-TI, the time to first and second ventilation through ILMA-TI of the 10 attempts. 2) The time to first ventilation through ILMA-TI was significantly shorter than that of ventilation through MLG-TI. 3) There was no significant difference between the time to ventilation through MLG-TI and the time to second ventilation through ILMA-TI. 4) The success rates of ILMA-TI were significantly higher than those of MLG-TI. Conclusion : ILMA-TI can be an alternative method for MLG-TI in advanced pre-hospital airway management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1269-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200305000-00032
  2. Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth 1994;41(5 Pt 1):372-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009858
  3. Stoelting RK. Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1977;47(4):381-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197710000-00012
  4. Park JH. Recognition and request for medical direction by 119 emergency medical technicians. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2011;15(3):31-44.
  5. Kang YJ, Choi ES. The level of awareness and practice in prehospital emergency patient assessment and emergency care of paramedic in fire station. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2011;15(2):67-84.
  6. Fullerton JN, Roberts KJ, Wyse M. Can experienced paramedics perform tracheal intubation at cardiac arrests? Five years experience of a regional air ambulance service in the UK. Resuscitation 2009;80(12):1342-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.023
  7. Lim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005;60(2):180-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04038.x
  8. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93(1):104-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200007000-00019
  9. Choi UJ, Cho KJ. A comparison of endotracheal intubation using the macintosh laryngoscope, the gum elastic bougie and the pentax airway scope in neck-stabilized manikin. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2011;15(3):71-80.
  10. Kim HS, Nam HW, Kim YH. The maximal changes of vital signs to laryngeal mask airway $ProSeal^{TM}$ insertion or tracheal intubation after anesthetic induction in hypertensive patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2002;43(2):145-9. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2002.43.2.145
  11. Brimacombe J. The advantage of the LMA over tracheal tube or face mask: a meta analysis. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:1017-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011075
  12. Dripps RD, Eckenhoff JE, Vandam LD, Longnecker DE, Murphy FL. Introduction to anesthesia. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1977. 137-58.
  13. Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway with special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1991;75(6):1087-110. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021
  14. Benumof JL. Laryngeal mask airway and ASA difficult airway algorithm. Anesthesiology 1996;84:686-99. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199603000-00024
  15. Korean Emergency Airway Management Society, Manual of Emergency Airway Management (Walls RM). 2nd ed. Seoul: Koonja, 2008. 120-31.
  16. Chien LC, Hsu HC, Lin CH, Cheng CF, Tung YC, Hung HC, et al. Use of an intubating laryngeal mask airway on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a developing emergency medical service system. J Formos Med Assoc 2012;111(1):24-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.01.004
  17. Reardon RF, Martel M. The intubating laryneeal mask airway: suggestions for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8(8):833-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00217.x
  18. Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology 2001;95(5):1175-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200111000-00022
  19. Tentillier E, Heydenreich C, Cros AM, Schmitt V, Dindart JM, Thicoipe M. Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway in emergency pre-hospital difficult intubation. Resuscitation 2008;77(1):30-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.06.035
  20. Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-$ProSeal^{TM}$: a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia 2011;66(12):1093-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x
  21. Lee YK, Do KJ, Ham KD, Han SM, Yang HS. Intubating laryngeal mask airway for difficult airway. Korean J Anesthesiol 2005;48:259-64. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2005.48.3.259
  22. Cho IH, Kwon TY, Yang HS, Han SM. Intubating laryngeal mask airway in awake intubation. Korean J Anesthesiol 2001;41(6):775-9. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2001.41.6.775
  23. Wong DT, Apichatibutra N, Arora G, Woo JA, Lee VY, Raghavan LV. Repeated attempts improve tracheal tube insertion time using the intubating laryngeal airway in a mannequin. J Clin Anesth 2010;22(8):619-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.06.005
  24. Brain AI, Verghese C, Addy EV, Kapila A, Brimacombe J. The intubating laryngeal mask. ll: A preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea. Br J Anaesth 1997;79(6):704-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/79.6.704
  25. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983;55:801-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/55.8.801
  26. Young B. The intubating laryngeal- mask airway may be an ideal device for airway control in the rural trauma patient. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21(1):80-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajem.2003.50012
  27. Komatsu R, Nagata O, Sessler Dl, Ozaki M. The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position. Anesth Analg 2004;98(3):858-61.
  28. Weiss M, Schwartz U, Dillier C, Fischer J, Gerber AC. Use of the intubating laryngeal mask in children: an evaluation using video endoscopic monitoring. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001;18(11):739-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003643-200111000-00006
  29. Timmermann A, Russo SG, Crozier TA, Nickel EA, Kazmaier S, Eich C, et al. Laryngoscopic versus intubating LMA guided tracheal intubation by novice users-A manikin study. Resuscitation 2007;73(3):412-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.019
  30. Caponas G. Intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30:551-69.