한국재난정보학회 논문집 (Journal of the Society of Disaster Information)

  • 제8권4호
  • /
  • Pages.347-361
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1976-2208(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-5287(eISSN)
한국재난정보학회 (The Korean Society of Disaster Information)
권호 표지

생활도로 보행환경 개선사업의 효과 연구

Study on the Effects of Pedestrian Improvement Projects

  • 발행 : 2012.12.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 보행환경 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 찾기 위하여 시민 283명을 대상으로 설문지를 이용하여 보행환경개선사업이 시행된 서울의 6개 지역을 선정하여 생활도로 보행 시 보행환경에 대한 만족도를 조사하였다. 리커트 5점 척도를 이용한 조사 결과 보행환경에 대한 만족도는 평균 2.88 표준편차 1.12인 것으로 조사되어 만족도가 낮은 수준임을 확인하였다. 보행환경 만족도와 세부항목들 사이의 상관관계를 분석한 결과 보행환경 만족도와 상관계수가 높은 세부항목은 보행시 안전성(0.640), 걷고 싶은 느낌(0.603), 보행시 쾌적성(0.601), 산책하거나 대화를 나누기에 적당함(0.586) 등인 것으로 분석되었다. 이 연구는 생활도로 보행환경 개선사업의 실효성을 높이기 위해서는 안전을 중시하면서도 시설물을 설치하는 데 머물기보다 쾌적한 환경을 조성하기 위한 보다 적극적인 개념의 생활도로 환경정비 기법을 적용해야 할 것이며 주민참여가 중요하다는 것을 확인하였다.

To find out the major factors affecting the pedestrian satisfaction, the quantitative evaluation on the walking environment were carried out using questionnaire with the 5-point Likert scale in the selected 6 community roads in Seoul. Data were analyzed using descriptive, correlation, and regression analysis. One of main findings reported that pedestrians are not satisfied yet with pedestrian environment(Mean=2.88, S.D.=1.12). The correlation analysis reported 'Safe to walk' (R=.640,p=.001), 'Feel like walking' (r=.603, p=.001), 'Enjoyable to walk'(R=.601,p=.001), and 'Adequate for walking & dialogue'(R=.586,p=.001), are top four factors that positively correlate with overall pedestrian satisfaction. Results indicate that safety should be considered in priorities but amenity development be thought to be important in pedestrian improvement projects. And a broad public participation in decision-making is needed for the effectiveness of the project.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jung, S.-W. (2010). An Analysis of Pedestrian Space and Community Facilities Using Behavior Pattern in New Towns. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hanyang University.
  2. Kim, J.-J., Choi, J.-S., Kim, S.-Y., Hang, K.-S. (2010). "Study on before and after analysis for applying the speed management strategy (Zone 30) in community streets." Korean Society of Road Engineers, Proceeding, Spring 2010.
  3. Kim, Y.-M., Kim, J.-Y., Kim, M.-K., Cha, H.-K., Choi, J.-M. (2005). "A study on satisfaction evaluation and participation motivation for opening of fence. Korea Planners Association, Proceeding, Nov.2005.
  4. Ko, E.-J., Lee, K.-H., Ahn, K.-H. (2006). "Effects of changes in pedestrian environment on the sense of community by the wall removal project." Urban Design, Vol.6, No.3, Dec.2006.
  5. Lee, J.-E. (2007). Residential Changes of Detached Housing Area in Seoul : A Case Study of Gui-dong, Gwangjin-gu. M.A. Thesis, Seoul National University.
  6. Lee, S.-B., Jung, D.-Y., Kim, D.-K. (2008). "The effects of a school zone improvement project on crash reduction regarding land use characteristics." Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol.26, No.3.
  7. Lim, S.-J. (1998). Improvement for Pedestrian Environment of Community Road. M.A. Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.
  8. MBPPPC (1987). Pedestrian Safety in Manhattan. Interim Report of the MBPPPC (Manhattan Borough President's Planning for Pedestrians Council).
  9. Moudon. (1987). Public Streets for Public Use. VNR.
  10. Park, S.-H., Choi, Y.-M., Seo, H.-L., Kim, J.-H. (2009). "Perception of pedestrian environment and satisfaction of neighborhood walking." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.25. No.8.
  11. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2010). Seoul Survey.
  12. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2011). Seoul Survey.
  13. Shojaei, S., Kamal M.S. (2012). "Preferences for Pedestrian Walkways in Tropical Urban Neighbourhoods of Kuala Lumpur." Journal of Environmental Research And Development, Vol.6 No.3, Jan-March 2012, MALAYSIA.
  14. Shin, J.-l. (2009). A Study on the Greenway Planning to Enhance the Community Environment. M.A. Thesis, Seoul National University.