References
- Oberg K, Castellano D. Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2011;30 Suppl 1:3-7
- Albores-Saavedra J, Gersell D, Gilks CB, Henson DE, Lindberg G, Santiago H, et al. Terminology of endocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: results of a workshop sponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the National Cancer Institute. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:34-39
- Sato Y, Shimamoto T, Amada S, Asada Y, Hayashi T. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of six cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2003;22:226-230 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PGP.0000071046.12278.D1
- Krivak TC, McBroom JW, Sundborg MJ, Crothers B, Parker MF. Large cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:187-191 https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6254
- Reig Castillejo A, Membrive Conejo I, Foro Arnalot P, Rodriguez de Dios N, Algara Lopez M. Neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Transl Oncol 2010;12:512-513 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-010-0546-0
- McCusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Tavassoli FJ. Endocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: incidence, demographics, and survival with comparison to squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2003;88:333-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00150-6
- Wang KL, Yang YC, Wang TY, Chen JR, Chen TC, Chen HS, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic retrospective study of 31 cases with prognostic implications. J Chemother 2006;18:209-216 https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2006.18.2.209
- Chung HH, Nam BH, Kim JW, Kang KW, Park NH, Song YS, et al. Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT maximum standardized uptake value predicts recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1467-1473 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1413-5
- Nakamura K, Okumura Y, Kodama J, Hongo A, Kanazawa S, Hiramatsu Y. The predictive value of measurement of SUVmax and SCC-antigen in patients with pretreatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:81-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.020
- Yilmaz M, Adli M, Celen Z, Zincirkeser S, Dirier A. FDG PET-CT in cervical cancer: relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and metastatic potential. Nucl Med Commun 2010;31:526-531
- Jhingran A, Levenback C. Malignagnt diseases of the cervix: microinvasive and invasive carcinoma: diagnosis and management. In: Katz VL, Lentz GM, Lobo RA, Gershenson DM. Comprehensive Gynecology, 5th ed. Philadelpia, PA: Mosby Elsevier;2007
- Henriksen E. The lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the cervix and of the body of the uterus; a study of 420 necropsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949;58:924-942 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(49)90200-8
- Yang DH, Kim JK, Kim KW, Bae SJ, Kim KH, Cho KS. MRI of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1255-1258 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821255
- Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2003;23:425-445; quiz 534-535 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.232025065
- Yen TC, Ng KK, Ma SY, Chou HH, Tsai CS, Hsueh S, et al. Value of dual-phase 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3651-3658 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.01.102
- Unger JB, Lilien DL, Caldito G, Ivy JJ, Charrier A, Bellaire B. The prognostic value of pretreatment 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan in women with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17:1062-1067 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00902.x
- Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2003;361:2217-2225 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13778-6
- Trinh XB, Bogers JJ, Van Marck EA, Tjalma WA. Treatment policy of neuroendocrine small cell cancer of the cervix. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004;25:40-44
- Belhocine TZ. 18F-FDG PET imaging in posttherapy monitoring of cervical cancers: from diagnosis to prognosis. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1602-1604
- Pallardy A, Bodet-Milin C, Oudoux A, Campion L, Bourbouloux E, Sagan C, et al. Clinical and survival impact of FDG PET in patients with suspicion of recurrent cervical carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1270-1278 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1417-1
Cited by
- 18F-FDG PET in small-cell cervical cancer: a prospective study with long-term follow-up vol.43, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3229-9
- Imaging and staging of neuroendocrine cervical cancer vol.43, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1667-0
- Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review of the literature vol.18, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4447-x
- Clinical and MRI Characteristics of Uterine Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Its Variants and Mimics vol.20, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0458
- 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography scan in patients with suspicion of recurrent neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix vol.42, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000001432