Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Formation and Evolution of Contact Binaries

  • Eggleton, Peter P. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
  • Received : 2012.03.02
  • Accepted : 2012.05.15
  • Published : 2012.06.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

I describe a series of processes, including hierarchical fragmentation, gravitational scattering, Kozai cycles within triple systems, tidal friction and magnetic braking, that I believe are responsible for producing the modest but significant fraction of stars that are observed as contact binaries. I also discuss further processes, namely heat transport, mass transport, nuclear evolution, thermal relaxation oscillations, and further magnetic braking with tidal friction, that influence the evolution during contact. The endpoint, for contact, is that the two components merge into a single star, as recently was observed in the remarkable system V1309 Sco. The single star probably throws off some mass and rotates rapidly at first, and then slows by magnetic braking to become a rather inconspicuous but normal dwarf or subgiant. If however the contact binary was part of a triple system originally-as I suggested above was rather likely-then the result could be a $widish$ binary with apparently non-coeval components. There are several such known.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecht S, Reffert S, Snellen IAG, Winn JN, Misaligned spin and orbital axes cause the anomalous precession of DIHerculis, Natur, 461, 373-376 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08408
  2. Bodenheimer P, Evolution of rotating interstellar clouds. III - On the formation of multiple star systems, ApJ, 224, 488-496 (1978). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/156396
  3. De Mey K, Aerts C, Waelkens C, van Winckel H, The early-type multiple system ${\eta}$ Orionis. II. Line profile variations in component Ab, A&A, 310, 164-172 (1996).
  4. Eggleton PP, Evolutionary processes in binary and multiple stars (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
  5. Eggleton PP, Tokovinin AA, A catalogue of multiplicity among bright stellar systems, MNRAS, 389, 869-879 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13596.x
  6. Fabrycky DC, Tremaine S, Shrinking binary and planetary orbits by Kozai cycles with tidal friction, ApJ, 669, 1298-1315 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/521702
  7. Flannery BP, A cyclic thermal instability in contact binary stars, ApJ, 205, 217-225 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1086/154266
  8. Gualandris A, Portegies Zwart S, Eggleton PP, N-body simulations of stars escaping from the Orion nebula, MNRAS, 350, 615-626 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07673.x
  9. Lloyd C, Wonnacott D, Is the ROSAT wide field camera EUV source and AM eclipsing binary, Delta Capricorni, also a Delta Scuti variable?, MNRAS, 266, L13-L16 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/266.1.L13
  10. Lucy LB, W Ursae Majoris systems with marginal contact, ApJ, 205, 208-216 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1086/154265
  11. Lucy LB, Wilson RE, Observational tests of theories of contact binaries, ApJ, 231, 502-513 (1979). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/157212
  12. Robertson JA, Eggleton PP, The evolution of W Ursae Majoris systems, MNRAS, 179, 359-375 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.359
  13. Rucinski SM, Lu W, W Crv: the shortest-period Algol with non-degenerate components?, MNRAS, 315, 587-594 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03422.x
  14. Rucinski SM, Pribulla T, van Kerkwijk MH, Contact binaries with additional components. III. A search using adaptive optics, AJ, 134, 2353-2365 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/523353
  15. Tokovinin A, Thomas S, Sterzik M, Udry S, Tertiary companions to close spectroscopic binaries, A&A, 450, 681-693 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054427
  16. Tylenda R, Hajduk M, Kaminski T, Udalski A, Soszynski I, et al., V1309 Scorpii: merger of a contact binary, A&A, 528, A114 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016221
  17. Yakut K, Eggleton PP, Evolution of close binary systems, ApJ, 629, 1055-1074 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431300
  18. van Hamme W, Samec RG, Gothard NW, Wilson RE, Faulkner DR, et al, CN andromedae: a broken-contact binary?, AJ, 122, 3436-3446 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324110

Cited by

  1. The First Photometric Study of NSVS 1461538: A New W-subtype Contact Binary with a Low Mass Ratio and Moderate Fill-out Factor vol.33, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2016.33.3.185
  2. Prediction of a Red Nova Outburst in KIC 9832227 vol.840, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ba7
  3. V1309 Sco—UNDERSTANDING A MERGER vol.786, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/39
  4. Physical Nature and Orbital Behavior of the Eclipsing System UZ Leonis vol.130, pp.985, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aaa390
  5. A simultaneous spectroscopic and photometric study of two eclipsing binaries: V566 Oph and V972 Her vol.363, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3252-y
  6. From dinuclear systems to close binary stars: Application to mass transfer vol.27, pp.07, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301318500635