Physiochemical Characteristics and Sensory Evaluation of Mulberry Fruit Beverages for Rural Food Process

산지가공 오디음료의 이화학적 특성 및 관능평가

  • Yang, Hyang-Sook (Dept. of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Rho, Jeong-Ok (Dept. of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Chonbuk National University)
  • 양향숙 (전북대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 노정옥 (전북대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2012.02.15
  • Accepted : 2012.04.13
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

The principal objectives of this study were to analyze the physiochemical properties of four mulberry fruit beverages (MFBs) and develop descriptive analysis procedures for evaluation of their sensory characteristics. Soluble solid, free sugar, pH, acidity, chromaticity, flavonoid, and anthocyanin of MFBs were determined. All MFB samples showed significantly different physicochemical properties ($p$<0.01). Ten highly trained panelists identified the following 11 sensory attributes in the MFBs and defined the terminology for each attribute : turbidity, chromaticity for appearance characteristics, berry, grass, fermented, sweet, astringent, and sour for flavor characteristics, and throat hit, refreshing, and astringent for textural characteristics. There were significant differences in the 10 sensory attributes among the MFB samples ($p$<0.001). In color, the value of MFB3 was significantly higher than those of others ($p$<0.05). In taste and overall acceptance, the values of MFB2 were significantly higher than those of others ($p$<0.01, $p$<0.001). Descriptive terminology of the developed MFBs could explain the sensory attributes of the samples according to this result. Based on this, proper analysis and sensory evaluation techniques could be applied to other fruit beverages to establish their physiochemical characteristic and descriptive sensory attributes.

Keywords

References

  1. 고광철 (1994) 뽕나무과실의 과수화와 이용기술연구(I) 뽕 나무 과수화 기초연구 농업특정연구개발사업보고서. 농촌진흥청.
  2. 김광옥, 김상숙, 성내경, 이영춘 (1993) 관능검사 방법 및 응 용. 신광출판사, 서울. p 131.
  3. 원제무, 이수일 (2007) 그림으로 쉽게 배우는 통계분석. 박영사, 서울. pp 131-139.
  4. 원태연, 정성원 (1999) 한글 SPSS 통계조사분석. 고려정보산 업, 서울. pp 292-297.
  5. 윤병선 (2008) 로컬푸드 관점에서 본 농산가공산업의 활성화 방안. 산업경제연구 21: 501-522.
  6. 전라북도 통계자료집 (2010) 2009년 원예농산물 주요 통계 자료집.
  7. 전재근 (2005) 관능에 관여하는 의식요소와 식품관능평가의 시간함수개념. 한국식품영양과학회, 2000년 추계 학술발 표회 논문발표전집 48차, pp 115-123.
  8. 채수규, 강갑석, 마상조, 방광용, 오문헌 (2000) 표준 식품분 석학. 지구문화사, 서울. pp 134-135.
  9. Ahn BI (2010) Directions for connecting regional agriculture with food industry. J Agriculture & Life Science 44:75-84.
  10. Cha HS, Lee MK, Hwang JB, Park MS, Park KM (2001) Physicochemical characteristics of Rubus coreanus Miquel. Korean J Food Sci Technol 30: 1021-1025.
  11. Cha WS, SHin HR, Park JH, Oh SL, Lee WY, Chun SS, Choo JW, Cho YJ (2004) Antioxidant activity of phenol compounds from mulberry fruits. Korean J Food Preserv 11: 383-387.
  12. Choi SY (2010) Studies on biological activity and beverage development of extracts from mulberry. Ph D Dissertation Daegu Haany University, Kyungbuk. pp 2-3.
  13. Choi YM, Yoon HH (2011) Sensory characteristics of espresso coffee according to green coffee processing. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 27: 773-781.
  14. Kim AJ, Park SJ, Rho JO (2008) Mulberry fruit extract consumption is inversely associated with hyperlipidemia in middle-aged men. Korean J Food & Nutr 21: 121-126.
  15. Kim EO, Lee YJ, Leem HH, Seo IH, Yu MH, Kang DH, Choi SW (2010) Comparison of nutritional and functional constituents, and physicochemical characteristics of mulberry from seven different Morus alba L. cultivars. Korean J Food & Nutr 39: 1467-1475. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.10.1467
  16. Kim H, Lee HS, Shin JY, Kim KO (2007) Sensory properties and consumer acceptability of coffee drinks contained sucralose and acesulfame-k. Korean J Food Sci Technol 39:527-533.
  17. Kim HB (2003) Quantification of cyanidin-3-glucoside(C3G) in mulberry fruits and grapes. Korean J Seric Sci 45: 1-5.
  18. Kim HB, Bang HS, Lee HW, Seuk YS, Sung GB (1999) Chemical characteristics of mulberry syncarp. Korean JSeric Sci 41: 23-128.
  19. Kim HB, Kim SL (2004) Quantification and varietal variation of rutin in mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 46: 1-5.
  20. Kim HB, Kim SL, Kang SW (2004a) Varietal analysis and quantification of amino acid in mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 46: 47-53.
  21. Kim HB, Kim SL, Moon JU (2002) Quantification and varietal variation of anthocyanin pigment in mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 34: 207-211.
  22. Kim HB, Kim SL, Moon JU (2003a) Quantification and varietal variation of free sugars in mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 45: 80-84.
  23. Kim HB, Kim SL, Sung GB, Nam HW, Chang SJ, Moon JU (2003b) Quantification and varietal variation of fatty acids in mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 45: 75-79.
  24. Kim HB, Kim SY, Lee HY, Kim SL, Kang SW (2005) Protective effect against neuronal cell and inhibitory activity against bacteria of mulberry fruit extracts. Korean J Crop Sci 50: 220-223.
  25. Kim HB, Kim SY, Ryu KS, Lee WC, Moon JY (2001) Effect of methanol extract from mulberry fruit on the lipid metabolism and liver function in cholesterol-induced hyperlipidemia rats. Korean J Seric Sci 43: 104-108.
  26. Kim HB, Koh SH, Oh NK, Jeong JS, Sung GB, Hong IP, Chung IM, Lee KG (2007) Agronomic characteristics and anti-oxidant capacity of mulberry genetic resources conserved by Jeollabuk-Do. Korean J Seric Sci 49: 60-66.
  27. Kim HJ, Choi SW, Cho SH (2010) Effects of various mulberry products on the blood glucose and lipid status of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Korean J Nutr 43: 551-560. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2010.43.6.551
  28. Kim IS, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Yun GS, Choe SW (2004b) Preparation of minimally processed mulberry (Morus spp.) juices. Korean J Food Sci Technol 36: 321-328.
  29. Kim KH (2011) The structural relationship among the selection attributes, satisfaction, and loyalty of green tea consumers: The moderating effect of involvement. Ph D Dissertation Sungshin Women's University, Seoul. pp 25-26.
  30. Kim SY, Park KJ, Lee WC (1998) Anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of Morus spp. fruit extract. Korean J Seric Sci 6: 204-209.
  31. Kim TW, Kwon YB, Lee JH, Yang IS, Youm JK, Lee HS, Moon JY (1996) A study on the antidiabetic effect of mulberry fruits. Korean J Seric Sci 38: 100-107.
  32. Kwon EH, Jung MA, Rhee SJ, Choi SW, Cho SH (2006) Antioxidant effects and improvement of lipid metabolism of mulberry fruit, mulberry leaves and silkworm powder with different mixing ratios in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Korean J Nutr 39: 91-99.
  33. Lee EJ, Bae JH (2011) Study on the alleviation of an alcohol induced hangover and the antioxidant activity by mulberry fruit. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 24: 204-209.
  34. Lee HW, Shin DH, Lee WC (1998) Morphological and chemical characteristics of mulberry (Morus) fruit with varietes. Korean J Seric Sci 40: 1-7.
  35. Lee JW, Do JH (2010) Determination of total phenolic compounds from the fruit of Rubus coreanus and antioxidative activity. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 943-947.
  36. Lee SY, Suh DS, Lee MK, Kim KO (2005) Development of descriptive analysis procedure for evaluating the sensory characteristics of yeast leavened breads. Korean J Food Culture 20: 53-60.
  37. Park SW, Jung YS, Ko KC (1997) Quantitative analysis of anthocyanins among mulberry cultivats and their pharmacological screening. J Korean Soc Kort Sci 38: 722-724.
  38. Rhim JW, Lee JW (2002) Degradation kinetics of anthocyanins in purple-fleshed sweet potato pigment concentrates and a Japanese plum juice based beverage. Korean J Food Sci Technol 34: 238-243.
  39. Sohn KS, Seo EJ, Lee JH (2006) Quality changes of orange juice as influenced by clarification methods. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 378-382. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.3.378
  40. Suh DS, Park JY (2005) Sensory research in food industry. Food Science & Industry 36: 28-33.
  41. Yang HS, Rho JO (2011) A study on the consumption patterns, the importance of product properties, and the satisfaction levels of blackberry and mulberry fruit beverage products in the Jeonbuk area. J Korean Home Eco Assoc 49: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.6115/khea.2011.49.10.029