DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Localization of Metadata Elements in the Art Museum Community

  • Nam, Young-Joon (Dept. of Library and information Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Min (Dept. of Library and information Science, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.04.02
  • 심사 : 2012.05.14
  • 발행 : 2012.05.30

초록

The art museums in South Korea are mostly small-scaled institutions with small amount of art works. Thus, internationally accepted metadata standards such as CDWA and VRA Core may not be efficient to manage their collections. Because of these distinct local characteristics, there is a need to create a set of metadata elements that can be used for the art museum community in the country. This research aims to propose a set of metadata elements customized to fit into the context of small-scaled art museums in South Korea. The construction of the element set was not from scratch but on the basis of existing standards such as CDWA, VRA Core, and Dublin Core. By identifying core elements that are indispensable in describing art works and collecting opinions of experts in art museums, the proposed set of metadata elements is expected to support the operation and management of art works and satisfy the localized needs of the art museum community.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Attig, John, Copeland, Ann, & Pelikan, Michael. 2004. "Context and meaning: The challenges of metadata for a digital image library within the university." College & Research Libraries, 65(3): 251-261. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.3.251
  2. Baca, Murtha, & Harpring, Patricia, eds. 2006. Categories for the Description of Works. [online]. [cited 2011.11.28]. .
  3. Bearman, David, & Geber, Kati. 2007. "Enhancing the role of cultural heritage institutions through new media: Transformational agendas and projects." In Proceedings of International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting (ICHIM07). Edited by J. Trant and D. Bearman. Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. [online]. [cited 2011.11.30]. .
  4. Caplan, Priscilla. 2003. Metadata Fundamentals for All Librarians. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  5. Elings, Mary, & Waibel, Gunter. 2007. "Metadata for all: Descriptive standards and metadata sharing across libraries, archives, and museums." First Monday, 12(3). [online]. [cited 2011.10.15]. .
  6. Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  7. Greenberg, Jane. 2003. "Metadata and the World Wide Web." In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol.72, Supplement 35: 1876-1888. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  8. Hillmann, Diane. 2005. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: Using Dublin Core. [online]. [cited 2011.11.2]. .
  9. Kalay, Yehuda E., Kvan, Thomas, & Affleck, Janice, eds. 2007. New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage. Routledge: London.
  10. Lanzi, Elisa, & McRae, Linda. 2007. "Cataloging cultural objects: Community building through standards." Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 34(1): 15-19.
  11. Nam, Taewoo & Lee, Seungmin. 2010. "Study on the semantic extension of the concept of metadata." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4): 373-393. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.373
  12. Neugebauer, Tomasz. 2005. "Metadata for image resources." Photography Media Journal, July (2005). [online]. [cited 2011.4.6]. .
  13. Sundgren, Bo. 1973. An Infological Approach to Data Bases. Ph.D. diss., School of Economics, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
  14. Sundgren, Bo. 1975. Theory of Data Bases. New York: Petrocelli/Charter.
  15. VRA Core Data Standards Committee. 2011. VRA Core 4.0 Introduction. VRA Core Schemas and Documentation. [online]. [cited 2011.9.20]. .