Effects of an Unexpected Change in Housing Environment on Stress in Poultry

급격한 사육환경의 변화가 가금의 생산성과 스트레스에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Jimin (Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Poultry Science Division) ;
  • Yoon, Hyung-sook (Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Poultry Science Division) ;
  • Hwangbo, Jong (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Yang-Ho (Department of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 김지민 (경상대학교 대학원 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 윤형숙 (경상대학교 대학원 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 황보종 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 김상호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 최양호 (경상대학교 축산학과)
  • Received : 2012.11.17
  • Accepted : 2012.12.06
  • Published : 2012.12.30

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an unexpected change in housing environment on stress in poultry. Laying hens (Hy-line Brown), adapted to a free-range housing system for more than a month, were randomly divided into two groups to be subjected to an unexpected change of their housing environment: one half of them were individually housed into conventional battery cages and the other continually left in the same housing system throughout the entire period of the study. The sudden change resulted in an increase in egg production and albumen height (P<0.05), but decrease in eggshell thickness (P<0.05). The change had tendency to increase Haugh unit ($P{\leq}0.061$) and to decrease eggshell color ($P{\leq}0.074$), but did not affect body weight for 5 days thereafter. No significant changes were detected in liver color. Plasma concentrations of corticosterone was acutely increased one day after the change (P<0.05), then returned to similar control levels. The results of the present study indicate that unexpected changes in housing environment cause acute increase in stress hormone concentrations, but interpretation of the results should be cautious due to the experimental conditions.

본 연구의 목적은 급격한 사육환경의 변화가 가금의 생산성과 스트레스 반응에 미치는 영향을 조사하는 것이다. 한달 이상 사육실에서 방사된 하이라인 갈색 산란계를 무작위로 두 집단으로 나누어 반을 계속해서 같은 방사환경에서, 다른 나머지 반을 관행 케이지에서 수용하여 사육하였다. 이러한 갑작스런 사육환경의 변화는 산란율 그리고 농후난백의 높이를 증가시켰고 (P<0.05), Haugh unit를 증가시키는 경향이 있었다 (P<0.061). 그러나 난각두께는 감소되었고 (P<0.05), 난각색은 감소되는 경향이 있었다. 환경변화 후 5일간산란계의 체중에는 변화가 없었으며 실험 종료시에 측정된 간의 색도에도 차이가 없었다. 관행 케이지로 이동된 다음날 혈장 corticosterone 농도는 급격하게 증가하였지만 (P<0.05), 5일째에는 대조구의 수준과 차이가 없었다. 이러한 결과는 급격한 사육환경의 변화는 스트레스 호르몬의 분비를 증가시킨다는 것을 사사한다. 그러나 제한된 실험조건 때문에 생산성에 관한 결과의 해석에 주의해야 할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도훈. 2009. 동물복지를 말한다 (Aug 26 방송). Pages 00:47:54 in 환경스페셜. 이연식 ed. KBS 1TV, Republic of Korea.
  2. 이수연. 2007. 유럽은 동물도 '복지시대' (Sep 26, 방송) KBS 1TV, Republic of Korea.
  3. Anderson, K. E. and Adams, A. W. 1994. Effects of cage versus floor rearing environments and cage floor mesh size on bone strength, fearfulness, and production of single comb White Leghorn hens. Poult Sci 73, 1233-1240.
  4. Choi, Y.-H. 2007. Management of Stress in Poultry Production. Korean J Poult Sci 34, 295-300. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2007.34.4.295
  5. Cunningham, D. L. and van Tienhoven, A. 1984. The effects of management program and social rank on behavior and productivity of white leghorn layers in cages. Poult Sci 63, 25-30.
  6. Dozier, W. A., 3rd, Thaxton, J. P., Purswell, J. L., Olanrewaju, H. A., Branton, S. L. and Roush, W. B. 2006. Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult Sci 85, 344-351.
  7. European Union. 2008. Animal Welfare: Commission report confirms the potential benefits of banning conventional battery cages for laying hens. Reference: IP/08/19 (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-08-19_en.htm). Access: 2012.11.01.
  8. Feltenstein, M. W., Lambdin, L. C., Webb, H. E., Warnick, J. E., Khan, S. I., Khan, I. A., Acevedo, E. O. and Sufka, K. J. 2003. Corticosterone response in the chick separation-stress paradigm. Physiol Behav 78, 489-493.
  9. Hughes, B. O., Wilson, S., Appleby, M. C. and Smith, S. F. 1993. Comparison of bone volume and strength as measures of skeletal integrity in caged laying hens with access to perches. Res Vet Sci 54, 202-206.
  10. Kucukyilmaz, K., Bozkurt, M., Herken, E. N., Cinar, M., Catl, A. U., Bintaş, E. and Coven, F. 2012. Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci 25, 559-568. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11382
  11. Krawczyk, J. and Gornowicz, E. 2010. Quality of eggs from hens kept in two different free-range systems in comparison with a barn system. Qualitat von eiern aus zwei verschiedenen freiland- und einem bodenhaltungssystem 74, 151-157.
  12. Littin, K. E. and Cockrem, J. F. 2001. Individual variation in corticosterone secretion in laying hens. Br Poult Sci 42, 536-546.
  13. Pistekova, V., Hovorka, M., Vecerek, V., Strakova, E. and Suchy, P. 2006. The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J Anim Sci 51, 318- 325.
  14. Saito, S., Tachibana, T., Choi, Y. H., Denbow, D. M. and Furuse, M. 2005. ICV CRF and isolation stress differentially enhance plasma corticosterone concentrations in layer- and meat-type neonatal chicks. Comp Biochem Physiol. Part A, Mole Integr Physiol 141, 305-309.
  15. Sherwin, C. M., Richards, G. J. and Nicol, C. J. 2010. Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. Br Poult Sci 51, 488-499.
  16. Shimmura, T., Azuma, T., Hirahara, S., Eguchi, Y., Uetake, K. and Tanaka, T. 2008. Relation between social order and use of resources in small and large furnished cages for laying hens. Br Poult Sci 49, 516-524.
  17. Shimmura, T., Eguchi, Y., Uetake, K. and Tanaka, T. 2007. Differences of behavior, use of resources and physical conditions between dominant and subordinate hens in furnished cages. Anim Sci. J. 78, 307-313.
  18. Singh, R., Cook, N., Cheng, K. M., and Silversides, F. G. 2009. Invasive and noninvasive measurement of stress in laying hens kept in conventional cages and in floor pens. Poult Sci 88, 1346-1351.
  19. Sorensen, P., Su, G. and Kestin, S. C. 1999. The effect of photoperiod:scotoperiod on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 78, 336-342.
  20. Wall, H. 2011. Production performance and proportion of nest eggs in layer hybrids housed in different designs of furnished cages. Poult Sci 90, 2153-2161.