Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DESIGN OF A LOAD FOLLOWING CONTROLLER FOR APR+ NUCLEAR PLANTS

  • Received : 2011.11.03
  • Accepted : 2012.02.21
  • Published : 2012.05.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A load-following operation in APR+ nuclear plants is necessary to reduce the need to adjust the boric acid concentration and to efficiently control the control rods for flexible operation. In particular, a disproportion in the axial flux distribution, which is normally caused by a load-following operation in a reactor core, causes xenon oscillation because the absorption cross-section of xenon is extremely large and its effects in a reactor are delayed by the iodine precursor. A model predictive control (MPC) method was used to design an automatic load-following controller for the integrated thermal power level and axial shape index (ASI) control for APR+ nuclear plants. Some tracking controllers employ the current tracking command only. On the other hand, the MPC can achieve better tracking performance because it considers future commands in addition to the current tracking command. The basic concept of the MPC is to solve an optimization problem for generating finite future control inputs at the current time and to implement as the current control input only the first control input among the solutions of the finite time steps. At the next time step, the procedure to solve the optimization problem is then repeated. The support vector regression (SVR) model that is used widely for function approximation problems is used to predict the future outputs based on previous inputs and outputs. In addition, a genetic algorithm is employed to minimize the objective function of a MPC control algorithm with multiple constraints. The power level and ASI are controlled by regulating the control banks and part-strength control banks together with an automatic adjustment of the boric acid concentration. The 3-dimensional MASTER code, which models APR+ nuclear plants, is interfaced to the proposed controller to confirm the performance of the controlling reactor power level and ASI. Numerical simulations showed that the proposed controller exhibits very fast tracking responses.

Keywords

References

  1. W. H. Kwon and A. E. Pearson, "A Modified Quadratic Cost Problem and Feedback stabilization of a Linear System," IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 838-842, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1977.1101619
  2. J. Richalet, A. Rault, J. L. Testud, and J. Papon, "Model Predictive Heuristic Control: Applications to Industrial Processes," Automatica, vol. 14, pp. 413-428, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90001-8
  3. C. E. Garcia, D. M. Prett, and M. Morari, "Model Predictive Control: Theory and Practice - A Survey," Automatica, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 335-348, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2
  4. D. W. Clarke, and R. Scattolini, "Constrained Receding - Horizon Predictive Control," IEE Proceedings-D, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 347-354, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-d.1991.0047
  5. M. V. Kothare, V. Balakrishnan, and M. Morari, "Robust Constrained Model Predictive Control Using Linear Matrix Inequality," Automatica, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1361-1379, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(96)00063-5
  6. J. W. Lee, W. H. Kwon, and J. H. Lee, "Receding Horizon $H^{\infty}$ Tracking Control for Time-Varying Discrete Linear Systems," Intl. J .Control, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 385-399, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/002071797223686
  7. J. W. Lee, W. H. Kwon, and J. Choi, "On Stability of Constrained Receding Horizon Control with Finite Terminal Weighting Matrix," Automatica, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1607-1612, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)80015-0
  8. M. G. Na, "A Model Predictive Controller for the Water Level of Nuclear Steam Generators," J. Korean Nucl. Soc., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 102-110, Feb. 2001.
  9. N. Z. Cho and L. M. Grossman, "Optimal Control for Xenon Spatial Oscillations in Load Follow of a Nuclear Reactor," Nucl. Sci. Eng., vol. 83, pp. 136-148, 1983. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A17995
  10. P.P. Niar and M. Gopal, "Sensitivity-Reduced Design for a Nuclear Pressurized Water Reactor," IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. NS-34, no. 6, pp. 1834-1842, Dec. 1987.
  11. C. Lin, J.-R. Chang, and S.-C. Jenc, "Robust Control of a Boiling Water Reactor," Nucl. Sci. Eng., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 283-294, July 1989. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A27478
  12. M. G. Park and N. Z. Cho, "Nonlinear Model-Based Robust Control of a Nuclear Reactor Using Adaptive PIF Gains and Variable Structure Controller," J. Korean Nucl. Soc., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 110-124, Mar. 1993.
  13. V. Kecman, Learning and Soft Computing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001.
  14. V.N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
  15. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer, 1995.
  16. D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989.
  17. M. Mitchell, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
  18. H. Sarimveis and G. Bafas, "Fuzzy Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Processes Using Genetic Algorithms," Fuzzy Sets Systems, vol. 139, pp. 59-80, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00506-7
  19. Man Gyun Na and In Joon Hwang, "Design of a PWR Power Controller Using Model Predictive Control Optimized by a Genetic Algorithm," Nucl. Eng. Tech., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 81-92, Feb. 2006.
  20. B. O. Cho, H. G. Joo, J. Y. Cho and S. Q. Zee.: MASTER: Reactor Core Design and Analysis Code, Proc. 2002 Int. Conf. New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 7-10, 2002.
  21. Math Works, MATLAB 2011, The Math Works, Natick, Massachusetts, 2011.

Cited by

  1. Data-Driven Subspace Predictive Control of a Nuclear Reactor vol.65, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2017.2785362