Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Learning Styles between Gifted and Non-gifted

영재학생과 일반학생의 학습양식 비교

  • Received : 2012.02.20
  • Accepted : 2012.03.26
  • Published : 2012.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study has two purposes: The first is to compare gifted with non-gifted about learning styles and examine differences in the preference of learning styles between group characteristics depending on gender. The second is to examine differences between gifted and non-gifted about the preference of learning styles. The participants were 152 students from the middle schools in A City. 76 students of them belonged to the gifted group and the rest were non-gifted group. LSDI Learning Styles Diagnostic Inventory has been employed as measurement tools. Besides descriptive statistics, ANOVA, ${\chi}^2$ analysis were used to measure items. The results from data analysis are as follows. First, there was difference in learning styles between gifted and non-gifted. Second, there was not difference in the preference of learning styles between groups depending on the gender. Finally, this study discussed the results and their implication, the direction of future research in understanding and interpreting of learning styles for their practical usages.

본 연구는 영재학생과 일반학생들의 학습양식을 비교하고, 성별에 따라 집단이 선호하는 스타일에 차이가 있는지를 확인하였다. 연구대상은 영재중학생 76명과 일반중학생 76명이었으며 모두 A시의 중학교에 재학중이었다. 학습양식을 확인하기 위한 검사도구로는 LSDI를 실시하였고, 연구목적을 달성하기 위해서 변량분석과 ${\chi}^2$ 검증을 실시하였다. 연구 목적에 따른 결론을 정리해 보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재학생과 일반학생들의 학습양식 선호에는 차이가 있었다. 영재학생들이 일반학생들보다 학습양식 선호경향이 더 강하게 나타났다. 둘째, 성별에 따라서 각 집단이 선호하는 학습스타일간에 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 그리고 두 집단의 학습양식을 해석하고 실제로 활용할 수 있는 함의와 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영채 (2011). 학습스타일 진담검사 표준화검사 요강. 대구: 창의력 한국 FPSP
  2. 김영채, 정미선, 정세영, 정혜인 (2011). 창의적 문제해결 스타일: 집단내 및 집단간 특성과 스타일 분포의 정규성. 사고개발, 7(1), 1-27.
  3. 김용, 서정희, 김지미, 김종혜, 차승은, 유승욱, 염용철, 장혜선, 이원규 (2007). 학습양식에 따른 초등정보영재와 일반아의 판별기능분석. 한국컴퓨터교육학회, 10(2), 9-16.
  4. 문정화, 김선희 (2010). 중학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 학습습관 및 시험불안 비교: 사이버 교육센터의 수.과학영재와 일반학생을 대상으로. 영재교육연구, 20(3), 831-846.
  5. 박경민, 정가영 (2010). 초등영재아의 학습스타일과 학습자 특성 간의 관계 연구. 영재교육 연구, 20(2), 571-594.
  6. 심규철, 김현섭 (2005). 과학 영재의 학습양식에 대한 재능 영역 및 성별에 따른 비교 연구. 한국생물교육학회, 33(4), 403-412.
  7. 윤소정 (2001). 고등학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 사고유형과 학습유형 차이. 석사학위논문. 부산대학교 대학원.
  8. 이정철, 강순민, 허옹욱 (2009). 한국과학영재학교 학생들의 과학적 태도, 학습양식, 선호하는 수업형태와 수업환경 조사를 통한 수업전략의 수립. 영재교육연구, 19(1), 138-159.
  9. 황혜숙, 임소혜, 윤소정 (2006). 영역별 영재와 일반아동의 사고양식과 학습양식과의 관계. 열린교육연구, 12(1), 261-288.
  10. Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2010). Learning styles of the gifted student in Turky. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 9, 198-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.136
  11. Bayrak, B. K., & Altun, S. (2009). Is there any difference between learning styles of student science teachers interrelation to both their grade and gender?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1(1), 765-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.136
  12. Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105-124). New York: Teachers College Press.
  13. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834
  14. Dunn (1983). Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional Children, 49(6), 496-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298304900602
  15. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice-Hall.
  16. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  17. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (1985). Teaching and counseling gifted students with their learning style preferences: Two case studies. Gifted Child Today, 15, 40-43.
  18. Dunn & Price (1993). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price systems, Inc.
  19. Dunn, R., & Milgram, R. M. (1993). Learning styles of gifted students in diverse cultures. In R. M. Milgram, R. Dunn, & G. E. Price (Eds.), Teaching and counseling gifted and talented adolescents (pp. 3-23). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  20. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1975). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
  21. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1980). The learning style characteristics of gifted students. Gifted Child Quality, 24, 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628002400107
  22. Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2006). 교사를 위한 수업전략[임청환, 권성기, 역] 서울: 시그마프레스. (원본출간년도: 2001)
  23. Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A new conception of giftedness and programming for he gifted. Illinois Council for the Gifted Journal, 5, 2-6.
  24. Griggs, S. A., & Dunn, R. S. (1984). Selected case studies of the learning style preferences of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(3), 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800304
  25. Hartley, J. (1998). Learning and studying: A research perspective. London: Routledge.
  26. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning styles: An overview. In NASSP (Ed.), Student learning styles and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Associantion of Secondary School Principals.
  27. Keefe, J. W., & Ferrell (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 57-61.
  28. Keefe, J. W., & Monks' (1986). Learning style profile examiners' manual. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principal.
  29. Keri, G. (2002). Male and Female College Students Learning Styles Differ: An Opportunity for Instructional Diversification. College Student Journal, 36(3), 433-442.
  30. Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
  31. Kolb, D. A. (1976). The Learning Styles Inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer & Company.
  32. Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning style inventory: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. Boston, NJ: NcBer and Company.
  33. Lee, M. S. (2008). A Multilevel Analysis of Gifted Korean American Students' Characteristics and School Context Effects on Learning Style Preferences. Gifted and Talented International, 23(2), 25-38.
  34. Marker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum Development for the Gifted. London: Aspen Systems Cooperation.
  35. McClelland, R., Yewchunk, C., & Mulcahy, R. (1991). Locus of control in underachieving and achieving gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(4), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329101400404
  36. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publisher.
  37. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261.
  38. Renzulli, J. S. (2003). The Three- Ring Conception of Giftedness: Its implications for understanding nature of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 79-96). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  39. Ricca, J. (1984). Learning styles and preference instructional strategies of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800305