Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the implant surgical technique and assessment rating system

  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Ji-Wan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2011.12.20
  • Accepted : 2012.01.14
  • Published : 2012.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: There has been no attempt to establish an objective implant surgical evaluation protocol to assess residents' surgical competence and improve their surgical outcomes. The present study presents a newly developed assessment and rating system and simulation model that can assist the teaching staffs to evaluate the surgical events and surgical skills of residents objectively. Methods: Articles published in peer-reviewed English journals were selected using several scientific databases and subsequently reviewed regarding surgical competence and assessment tools. Particularly, medical journals reporting rating and evaluation protocols for various types of medical surgeries were thoroughly analyzed. Based on these studies, an implant surgical technique assessment and rating system (iSTAR) has been developed. Also, a specialized dental typodont was developed for the valid and reliable assessment of surgery. Results: The iSTAR consists of two parts including surgical information and task-specific checklists. Specialized simulation model was subsequently produced and can be used in combination with iSTAR. Conclusions: The assessment and rating system provided may serve as a reference guide for teaching staffs to evaluate the residents' implant surgical techniques.

Keywords

References

  1. Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted's concept of surgical training. Surgery 1952;32:518-27.
  2. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003;327:1032-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1032
  3. Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 1993;165:358-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80843-8
  4. Scott DJ, Valentine RJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, et al. Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment. Surgery 2000;128: 613-22. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2000.108115
  5. Kopta JA. An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 1971;70:297-303.
  6. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W. Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg 1997;173:226-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89597-9
  7. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 2003;17:964-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8828-4
  8. Cremers SL, Ciolino JB, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK, Henderson BA. Objective Assessment of Skills in Intraocular Surgery (OASIS). Ophthalmology 2005;112:1236-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.045
  9. Francis NK, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. The performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study. Arch Surg 2002;137:841-4.
  10. Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;50:124-30.
  11. Goff BA, Lentz GM, Lee D, Fenner D, Morris J, Mandel LS. Development of a bench station objective structured assessment of technical skills. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:412-6.
  12. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997;84:273-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840237
  13. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985.
  14. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  15. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Surgical procedures. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985.
  16. Lekholm U, Jemt T. Principles for single tooth replacement. Chicago: Quintessence; 1989.
  17. Palacci P, Ericsson I, Engstrand P, Rangert B. Optimal implant positioning and soft tissue management for the branemark system. Chicago: Quintessence; 1995.
  18. Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M, Palmquist C. Mk II: the self-tapping Brånemark implant: 5-year results of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:279-85. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080405.x
  19. Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.
  20. Schuwirth LW. Assessing medical competence: finding the right answers. Clin Teach 2004;1:14-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2004.00012.x

Cited by

  1. Research of Tendency for Implant Placement According to Experience of Operator: A Retrospective Study vol.21, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12972/implant.20170017