DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of retrograded rice on weight control, gut function, and lipid concentrations in rats

  • Ha, Ae-Wha (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Gwi-Jung (Division of Fermentation and Food Processing, Department of Agro-food Resources, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Kyoung (Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2011.10.07
  • Accepted : 2012.01.16
  • Published : 2012.02.29

Abstract

The effects of retrograded rice on body weight gain, gut functions, and hypolipidemic actions in rats were examined. When the retrograded rice was produced by repetitive heating and cooling cycles, it contained significantly higher amounts of resistant starch ($13.9{\pm}0.98%$) than is found in common rice ($9.1{\pm}1.02%$) (P < 0.05). Sprague-Dawley rats were fed either common rice powder or retrograded rice powder, and mean body weight gain was significantly lower in the retrograded rice group (P < 0.05). The liver weight of the retrograded rice group ($14.5{\pm}0.5\;g$) was significantly lower than that of the common rice group ($17.1{\pm}0.3\;g$, P < 0.05). However, the weights of other organs, such as the kidney, spleen, thymus, and epididymal fat pad were not significantly affected by rice feeding. Intestinal transit time tended to be lower in rats fed retrograded rice when compared to rats fed the common rice, but the difference was not significant. The retrograded rice diet significantly increased stool output when compared to that in the common rice powder diet (P < 0.05), whereas fecal moisture content (%) was significantly higher in the retrograded rice group ($23.3{\pm}1.2$) than that in the common rice group ($19.1{\pm}1.2$) (P < 0.05). The retrograded rice group had significantly lower plasma cholesterol (P < 0.05), liver cholesterol (P < 0.05), and triacylglycerol contents in adipose tissue (P < 0.05) when compared to those in the common rice group. In conclusion, retrograded rice had higher resistant starch levels compared with those of common rice powder, and it lowered body weight gain and improved lipid profiles and gut function in rats.

Keywords

References

  1. Shimotoyodome A, Suzuki J, Fukuoka D, Tokimitsu I, Hase T. RS4-type resistant starch prevents high-fat diet-induced obesity via increased hepatic fatty acid oxidation and decreased postprandial GIP in C57BL/6J mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010;298:E652-62. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00468.2009
  2. Nugent AP. Health properties of resistant starch. Nutr Bull 2005;30:27-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00481.x
  3. Annison G, Topping DL. Nutritional role of resistant starch: chemical structure vs physiological function. Annu Rev Nutr 1994;14:297-320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.14.070194.001501
  4. Kim WK, Chung MK, Kang NE, Kim MH, Park OJ. Effect of resistant starch from corn or rice on glucose control, colonic events, and blood lipid concentrations in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Nutr Biochem 2003;14:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(02)00281-4
  5. Benmoussa M, Moldenhauer KA, Hamaker BR. Rice amylopectin fine structure variability affects starch digestion properties. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:1475-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062349x
  6. da Rosa Zavareze E, Storck CR, de Castro LAS, Schirmer MA, Dais ARG. Effect of heat-moisture treatment on rice starch of varying amylose content. Food Chem 2010;121:358-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.036
  7. Guraya HS, James C, Champagne ET. Effect of cooling, and freezing on the digestibility of debranched rice starch and physical properties of the resulting material. Starke 2001;53:64-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379X(200102)53:2<64::AID-STAR64>3.0.CO;2-R
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The forth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV). Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2009. p.26-7.
  9. Shu X, Jia L, Ye H, Li C, Wu D. Slow digestion properties of rice different in resistant starch. J Agric Food Chem 2009:57: 7552-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900988h
  10. AOAC INTERNATIONAL. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Vol. II, 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC INTERNATIONAL; 1990. Sec.985.29.
  11. Champ M. Determination of resistant starch in foods and food products: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46 Suppl 2:S51-62.
  12. Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC Jr. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 1993;123:1939-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/123.11.1939
  13. Stevens J, VanSoest PJ, Robertson JB, Levitsky DA. Mean transit time measurement by analysis of a single stool after ingestion of multicolored plastic pellets. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;46:1048-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/46.6.1048
  14. Frings CS, Dunn RT. A colorimetric method for determination of total serum lipids based on the sulfo-phospho-vanillin reaction. Am J Clin Pathol 1970;53:89-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/53.1.89
  15. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957;226:497-509.
  16. Hu P, Zhao H, Duan Z, Linlin Z,Wu D. Starch digestibility and the estimated glycemic score of different types of rice differing in amylose contents. J Cereal Sci 2004;20:1-7.
  17. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46 Suppl 2:S33-50.
  18. Patindol JA, Guraya HS, Champagne ET, McClung AM. Nutritionally important starch fractions of rice cultivars grown in southern United States. J Food Sci 2010;75:H137-44.
  19. Sajilata MG, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR. Resistant starch - a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2006;5:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x
  20. Yadav BS, Sharma A, Yadav RB. Studies on effect of multiple heating/cooling cycles on the resistant starch formation in cereals, legumes and tubers. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2009;60 Suppl 4:258-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480902970975
  21. Lerer-Metzger M, Rizkalla SW, Luo J, Champ M, Kabir M, Bruzzo F, Bornet F, Slama G. Effects of longterm low-glycaemic index starchy food on plasma glucose and lipid concentrations and adipose tissue cellularity in normal and diabetic rats. Br J Nutr 1996:75:723-32. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960176
  22. Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:559-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.3.559
  23. de Deckere EA, Kloots WJ, van Amelsvoort JM. Both raw and retrograded starch decrease serum triacylglycerol concentration and fat accretion in the rat. Br J Nutr 1995:73:287-98. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950030
  24. Bird AR, Hayakawa T, Marsono Y, Gooden JM, Record IR, Correll RL, Topping DL. Coarse brown rice increases fecal and large bowel short-chain fatty acids and starch but lowers calcium in the large bowel of pigs. J Nutr 2000;130:1780-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.7.1780
  25. Skrabanja V, Liljeberg Elmstahl HG, Kreft I, Bjorck IM. Nutritional properties of starch in buckwheat products: studies in vitro and in vivo. J Agric Food Chem 2001;49:490-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000779w
  26. Tapsell LC. Diet and metabolic syndrome: where does resistant starch fit in? J AOAC Int 2004;87:756-60.
  27. Higgins JA. Resistant starch: metabolic effects and potential health benefits. J AOAC Int 2004;87:761-8.
  28. Raben A, Tagliabue A, Christensen NJ, Madsen J, Holst JJ, Astrup A. Resistant starch: the effect on postprandial glycaemia, hormonal response, and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 1994:60:544-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/60.4.544
  29. Keenan MJ, Zhou J, McCutcheon KL, Raggio AM, Bateman HG, Todd E, Jones CK, Tulley RT, Melton S, Martin RJ, Hegsted M. Effects of resistant starch, a non-digestible fermentable fiber, on reducing body fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14:1523-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.176
  30. Sundaravalli OE, Shurpalekar KS, Rao MN. Inclusion of cellulose in calorie-restricted diets. Effect on body composition, nitrogen balance, and cholesterol levels in obese rats. J Am Diet Assoc 1973;62:41-3.
  31. Akiba Y, Horigane A, Matsumoto T. Effects of food intake and force feeding on liver fat accumulation in laying Japanese quails. Jpn J Zootech Sci 1978;849:54-60.
  32. Fisher H, Griminger P. Cholesterol-lowering effects of certain grains and of oat fractions in the chick. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1967;126:108-11. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-126-32378

Cited by

  1. Development of dume-buchu (Allium senescens L.) cracker with retrograded rice for children snacks vol.21, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-012-0178-y
  2. Positive effects of resistant starch supplementation on bowel function in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials vol.68, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1226275
  3. Comparative study on resistant starch, amilose content and glycaemic index after precooked process in white rice vol.131, pp.1755-1315, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/131/1/012017
  4. Resistant starch does not affect zinc homeostasis in rural Malawian children vol.30, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2015.01.005
  5. Brown rice and retrograded brown rice alleviate inflammatory response in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mice vol.8, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fo00305f
  6. Hypolipidaemic Effects of High Resistant Starch Sago and Red Bean Flour- based Analog Rice on Diabetic Rats vol.30, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2018.30.232-239
  7. Effect of post‐cooking storage on texture and in vitro starch digestion of Japonica rice vol.42, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12985
  8. Impact of dietary intake of resistant starch on obesity and associated metabolic profiles in human: a systematic review of the literature vol.61, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1747391