DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison Study on the Change in Lumbar Lordosis When Standing, Sitting on a Chair, and Sitting on the Floor in Normal Individuals

  • Bae, Jun-Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Jang, Jee-Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Uk (Department of Orthpedic Surgery, Seoul Wooridul Hospital)
  • Received : 2011.09.23
  • Accepted : 2012.01.25
  • Published : 2012.01.28

Abstract

Objective : To compare radiographic analysis on the sagittal lumbar curve when standing, sitting on a chair, and sitting on the floor. Methods : Thirty asymptomatic volunteers without a history of spinal pathology were recruited. The study population comprised 11 women and 19 men with a mean age of 29.8 years. An independent observer assessed whole lumbar lordosis (WL) and segmental lordosis (SL) between L1 and S1 using the Cobb's angle on lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine obtained from normal individuals when standing, sitting on a chair, and sitting on the floor. WL and SL at each segment were compared for each position. Results : WL when sitting on the floor was reduced by 72.9% than the average of that in the standing position. Of the total decrease in WL, 78% occurred between L4 to S1. There were significant decreases in SL at all lumbar spinal levels, except L1-2, when sitting on the floor as compared to when standing and sitting on a chair. Changes in WL between the positions when sitting on a chair and when sitting on the floor were mostly contributed by the loss of SL at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Conclusion : When sitting on the floor, WL is relatively low; this is mostly because of decreasing lordosis at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. In the case of lower lumbar fusion, hyperflexion is expected at the adjacent segment when sitting on the floor. To avoid this, sitting with a lordotic lumbar curve is important. Surgeons should remember to create sufficient lordosis when performing lower lumbar fusion surgery in patients with an oriental life style.

Keywords

References

  1. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, et al. : Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments : a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 1560-1566, 2003
  2. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA : Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions : a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 2510-2517, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af2622
  3. Bae JS, Lee SH, Kim JS, Jung B, Choi G : Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis : minimum 3 years of follow-up. Neurosurgery 67 : 1600-1607; discussion 1607-1608, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f91697
  4. Callaghan JP, McGill SM : Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting. Ergonomics 44 : 280-294, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130118276
  5. Dunk NM, Callaghan JP : Lumbar spine movement patterns during prolonged sitting differentiate low back pain developers from matched asymptomatic controls. Work 35 : 3-14, 2010
  6. Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG : Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 1996-2005, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000138272.54896.33
  7. Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA : The effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 86-91; discussion 91-92, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019
  8. Harrison DD, Harrison SO, Croft AC, Harrison DE, Troyanovich SJ : Sitting biomechanics part I : review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22 : 594-609, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(99)70020-5
  9. Jackson RP, McManus AC : Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 1611-1618, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199407001-00010
  10. Kavcic N, Grenier S, McGill SM : Determining the stabilizing role of individual torso muscles during rehabilitation exercises. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 1254-1265, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00016
  11. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M : Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 59-64, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200201010-00014
  12. Macintosh JE, Bogduk N, Pearcy MJ : The effects of flexion on the geometry and actions of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18 : 884-893, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199306000-00013
  13. Makhsous M, Lin F, Bankard J, Hendrix RW, Hepler M, Press J : Biomechanical effects of sitting with adjustable ischial and lumbar support on occupational low back pain : evaluation of sitting load and back muscle activity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10 : 17, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-17
  14. O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Burnett A, Chen D, Booth R, Carlsen C, et al. : Evaluation of the flexion relaxation phenomenon of the trunk muscles in sitting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2009-2016, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000228845.27561.e0
  15. Pope MH, Goh KL, Magnusson ML : Spine ergonomics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4 : 49-68, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.092101.122107

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Wallet Thickness on Spine Posture, Seat Interface Pressure, and Perceived Discomfort During Sitting vol.2, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2014.962712
  2. The Effects of Running in Place on Healthy Adults’ Lumbar Stability vol.26, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.821
  3. The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension vol.23, pp.suppl1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3162-1
  4. Biomechanical Effect of Altered Lumbar Lordosis on Intervertebral Lumbar Joints During the Golf Swing: A Simulation Study vol.136, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028427
  5. Effects of running in place accompanied by abdominal drawing-in on the posture of healthy adults vol.27, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1613
  6. The Correlation Between Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis and Surgical Outcome in the Treatment of Low-grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Fusion vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000061
  7. The impact of office chair features on lumbar lordosis, intervertebral joint and sacral tilt angles: a radiographic assessment vol.60, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1265670
  8. The effects of dynamic exercise using the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation pattern on posture in healthy adults vol.29, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1070
  9. Deep neck flexor endurance in university students: normative data and reliability vol.7, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2018.7.4.186
  10. CLASSIFICATION OF SPINAL POSTURES DURING CROSS-LEGGED SITTING ON THE FLOOR vol.19, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519419400566
  11. Lower Satisfaction After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Japan Than in the United States Despite Similar SRS-22 Pain and Function Scores : A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis vol.45, pp.17, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003483