Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy

Asian Society for Innovation and Policy (아시아기술혁신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Use of Feed-forward and Feedback Learning in Firm-University Knowledge Development: The Case of Japan

  • Oh, In-Gyu (SolBridge International School of Business)
  • Published : 2012.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The problem Japanese universities face is exactly the same as that of German universities: no international recognition in world rankings of universities despite their high levels of postwar economic and technological developments. This was indeed one reason why world-class Japanese firms, such as Toyota and Sony, have avoided working closely with Japanese universities for R&D partnership and new technology commercialization. To resolve this problem, the Japanese government has continuously implemented aggressive policies of the internationalization, privatization, liberalization, and privatization of universities since the onset of the economic recession in 1989 in order to revitalize the Japanese economy through radical innovation projects between universities and firms. National projects of developing medical robots for Japan's ageing society are some of the ambitious examples that emphasize feed-forward learning in innovation. However, this paper argues that none of these programs of fostering university-firm alliances toward feed-forward learning has been successful in promoting the world ranking of Japanese universities, although they showed potentials of reinforcing their conventional strength of introducing $kaizen$ through feedback learning of tacit knowledge. It is therefore argued in this paper that Japanese universities and firms should focus on feedback learning as a way to motivate firm-university R&D alliances.

Keywords

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1990) Overcoming Organizational Defenses, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  2. Beer, M., Voelpel, S.C., Leibold, M., Tekie, E.B. (2005) Strategic management as organizational learning: developing fit and alignment through a disciplined process, Long Range Planning, 38, 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.008
  3. Berkovitz, J., Feldman, M. (2005) Fishing Upstream: Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances, Discussion Paper, DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks, and Systems.
  4. Berlant, L. (1988) Female complaint, Social Text, 19, 237-259.
  5. Berthoin-Antal, A., Lenhardt, U., Rosenbrock, R. (2003) Barriers to organizational learning, In Dierkes, M., Berthoin-Antal, A.B., Child, J., Nonaka, I. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, 865-885, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Cannon, M.D., Edmondson, A. (2001) Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85
  7. Capron, H., Cincera, M. (2003) Industry-university S&T transfers: Belgium evidence on CIS data. Brussels Economic Review, 46(3), 58-85.
  8. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. (2002) Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition and Cooperation, CEPR Discussion Paper, 3284.
  9. Cohen, M.D. (1991) Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections, Organization Science, 2, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.135
  10. Cohen, M.D., Bacdayan, P. (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study, Organization Science, 4, 554-568.
  11. Coopey, J. (1995) The learning organization, power, politics and ideology, Management Learning, 26(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050769502600204
  12. Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W., White, R.E. (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution, Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, New York: HarperCollins.
  14. Daigaku S., (1998) 21seki no daigakuzo to kongo no kaikaku hosaku nit suite, Tokyo: MEXT.
  15. Diaz, R. (2006) Melancholic Maladies: Paranoid ethics, reparative envy, and Asian American critique, Women and Performance, 16(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07407700600744477
  16. Edmondson, A., Moingeon, B. (1996) From organizational learning to the learning organization, Management Learning, 29, 5-20.
  17. Elliott, D., Smith, D., McGuinness, M. (2000) Exploring the failure to learn: crisis and the barriers to learning, Review of Business, 21, 17-24.
  18. Eng, D. (2000) Melancholia in the Late Twentieth Century, Signs, 25(4), 1275-1281. https://doi.org/10.1086/495560
  19. Eom, B.-Y., Lee, K. (2010) Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization, Research Policy, 39, 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.015
  20. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., Matt, M. (2006) Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling, Research Policy, 35, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
  21. Freel, M.S., Harrison, R.T. (2006) Innovation and cooperation in the small firm sector: evidence from northern Britain, Regional Studies, 40(4), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600725095
  22. Freud, S. ([1917]1963) Mourning and melancholia, In Rieff, P. (ed), General Psychological Theory, 164-179, New York: Collier.
  23. Garson, B. (1988) The Electronic Sweatshop: How Computers Are Transforming the Office of the Future into the Factory of the Past, New York: Simon and Schuster.
  24. Geisler, E. (1995) Industry-university technology cooperation: a theory of interorganizational relationships, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524205
  25. Greenfeld, L. (1990) The formation of the Russian national identity: The role of status insecurity and ressentiment, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(3), 549-591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500016625
  26. Hedberg, B. Wolff, R. (2003) Organizing, learning, and strategizing: from construction to discovery, In Dierkes, M., Berthoin-Antal, A.B., Child, J., Nonaka, I. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 535-556.
  27. Inkpen, A.C., Crossan, M.M. (1996) Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organizational learning, In Russ-Eft, D., Preskill, H., Sleezer, C. (eds.) Human Resource Development Review: Research and Implications, 299-329, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  28. Ito, K. (2008) Nihon ni No-berushoga Kuru Riyu, Tokyo: Asahishinbun Shuppan.
  29. JETRO (2011) Robotics, Available online at: http://www.jetro.org/content/279/215, Accessed on Oct. 19, 2011.
  30. JST(Japan Science and Technology Agency) (2011) Sangakukan kanren deta, Available online at: http://sangakukan.jp/top/databook_contents/2010, Accessed on Nov. 7, 2011.
  31. Kato, K., Enomoto, S. (2006) Sangakurenkei kenkyûkaihatsu purojekuto niokeru kadai to sono kaizenjirei, Purojekuto Manejimento Gakkaishi, 8(1), 17-22.
  32. Kim, D.H. (1993) The link between individual and organizational learning, Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37-50.
  33. Kogut, B. (1988) Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 319-332.
  34. Kristeva, J. (1989) Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia, New York: Columbia University Press.
  35. Lacan, J. ([1966]2001) Ecrits. London: Routledge.
  36. Lawrence, T.B., Mauws, M.K., Dyck, B., Kleysen, R.F. (2005) The politics of organizational learning: integrating power into the 4I framework, Academy of Management Review, 30, 180-191. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281451
  37. Levitt, B. March, J.G. (1988) Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
  38. Love, H.J., Roper, S. (1999) The determinants of innovation: R&D technology transfer and networking effects, Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963
  39. McCracken, M. (2005) Towards a typology of managerial barriers to learning, Journal of Management Development, 24, 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510601008
  40. March, J.G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  41. Meltzer, B.N., Musolf, G.R., Resentment and Ressentiment, Sociological Inquiry, 72(2), 240- 255.
  42. METI(Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) (2010) Waga Guni no Sangyo Gijutsu ni Kansuru Kenkyu Kaihatsu Katsudo no Doko : Shuyo Shihyo to Deta, Tokyo: METI.
  43. MEXT(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology) (2008) Sangakukan renkei no suishin oyobi kagakugijutsu shinko no tameno kiban no kyoka, Report prepared by Kenkyushinkokyoku, Tokyo: MEXT.
  44. MEXT(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology) (2010) Heisei 21 Nendo Daigakuni okeru Sangakurenkeito Jitsijokyo ni Tsuite, Tokyo: MEXT.
  45. Miyata, Y., Nishimura, Y. (2007) Nihongata inobeshon to sangakurenkei no jittai, Osaka Furitsudaigaku Keizai Kenkyu, 52(4), 1-26.
  46. Mohnen, P., Hoareau, C. (2003) What type of enterprises forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS2, Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1086
  47. Monjon, S., Waelbroeck, P. (2003) Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from french firm-level data, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1255-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00082-1
  48. Moorman, C., Miner, A.S. (1998) Organizational improvisation and organizational memory, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723.
  49. Morioka, H. (2007) Sangyokai kara mita raisensu bunya no sangaku renkei to chitekizaisan no arikata, In Nagaoka S. (Ed.), Hokokusho: Daigaku ni okeru Chitekizaisanken Kenkyu Purojekuto, 5/1-5/22, Tokyo: Tokkyocho.
  50. Nishio, K. (2007) Nihon ni okeru sangakukan no soshikiteki kenkyu kyoryoku ni kansuru kenkyu, Kenkyu Gijutsu Keikaku, 22(1), 65-81.
  51. Nonaka, I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5, 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  52. Nooteboom, B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  53. Ogura, M. (2008) Nihon no daigakutohatsu bencha- to seifukei kenkyuhatsu bencha, 129-151, In Akademiku Inobe-shon: Sangakurenkei to Suta-to Appusu Soshutsu, Watanabe, T. (ed.), Tokyo: Hakuto Shobo.
  54. Oh, I. (2010) Education and development: Why are Koreans obsessed with Learning? Comparative Sociology, 9, 308-327. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913209X12499527665422
  55. Oh, I. (2011a) Not yet Triple Helix III? Japanese MOT policies and the problem of technology exploitation, In Saad M., Zawdie, G. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix System in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges, 283-304, New York: Routledge.
  56. Oh, I. (2011b) Torn between two lovers: Retrospective learning and melancholia among Japanese women, Korea Observer, 42(2), 223-254.
  57. Popper, M., Lipshitz, R. (2000) Organizational learning: mechanisms, culture, and feasibility, Management Learning, 31(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600312003
  58. QS(QS World University Rankings), (2011) QS World University Rankings, 2011-2011, Available online: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2011, Accessed on Oct. 27, 2011.
  59. Reginster, B. (1997) Nietzsche on Ressentiment and Valuation, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(2), 281-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953719
  60. Rosenberg, N., Nelson, R. (1994) American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry, Research Policy, 23, 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
  61. Santoro, M.D. (2000) Success breeds success: the linkages between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative ventures, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00032-8
  62. Santoro, M.D., Chakrabarti, A.K. (2002) Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions, Research Policy, 31, 1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  63. Schilling, J., Kluge, A. (2009) Barriers to organizational learning: an integration of theory and research, International Journal of Management Review, 11:3:337-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00242.x
  64. Spender, J.C. (1989) Industry Recipes: An Inquiry into the Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement, Oxford: Blackwell.
  65. Starbuck, W.H., Hedberg, B. (2003) How organizations learn from success and failure, In Dierkes, M., Berthoin-Antal, A.B., Child, J., Nonaka, I. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, 327-350, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  66. Streip, K. (1994) Just a Cerebrale: Jean Rhys, Women's Humor, and Ressentiment, Representations, 45(Winter), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.1994.45.1.99p0214d
  67. Sun, P.Y.-T., Scott, J.L. (2005) An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510590236
  68. Szulanski, G. (2003) Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  69. Taguchi, T. (2003) Sangakukyodo to Kenkyukaihatsu Senryaku, Tokyo: Hakuto Shobo.
  70. Tamura, Y. (2006) MOT to sangakurenkei manejimento, Ofisu O-tome-shon, 26(4), 35-44.
  71. Teece, D. (1985) Multinational Enterprise, Internal Governance and Industrial Organization, American Economic Review, 75, 233-238.
  72. Tether, B.S. (2002) Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31, 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
  73. Van de Ven, A.H., Polley, D. (1992) Learning while innovating, Organization Science, 3, 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.92
  74. Virany, B., Tushman, M.L., Romanelli, E. (1992) Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: an organizational learning approach, Organization Science, 3, 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.72
  75. WEF(World Economic Forum) (2011) The Global Competiveness Report, 2011-2012, Geneva: Switzerland.
  76. WTLO(Waseda Technology Licensing Organization) (2011) Data Available online: http://tlo.waseda.ac.jp/ABOUT/data.html, Accessed on Nov. 6, 2011.
  77. Zander, U., Kogut, B. (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test, Organization Science, 6, 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.76
  78. Zell, D. (2001) Overcoming barriers to work innovations: lessons learned at Hewlett-Packard, Organizational Dynamics, 30(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00042-0
  79. Zizek, S. (2000) Melancholy and the Act, Critical Inquiry, 26, 657-681. https://doi.org/10.1086/448987